Posted on 07/29/2021 9:49:39 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
ADE doesn’t refer to viral loads (although that it unexpected and interesting in itself).
Google “double dengue shock syndrome”. ADE means you get sicker and maybe die the second time, either after two natural infections or after vax + infection.
I’ve been concerned about this since we started (not enough not to be vaccinated). It does not appear that these “breakthrough” cases are exhibiting ADE in their clinical manifestations.
If there’s data to say so I’d like to see it.
Bttt
I agree with you. Let’s look at the data. We must stick with evidence based medicine.
The fact that ADE is usually identified in Phase 3 of the vaccine testing and this has been bypassed for the Covid-19 vaccines bothers me.
Per the above article, it has been a problem in coronavirus vaccine research in the past.
Dr. Malone explained that if ADE occurs, it generally starts as the protection the vaccine originally provided begins to wane. He said that this appears to be happening with the mRNA vaccines right now, at about the six month mark. The tests likely weren’t run long enough to detect this effect, because of the mad rush to develop something, anything. If I understood the technical reasons correctly, ADE occurs because the weakening vaccine puts just enough pressure on the virus to adapt, while not being effective at killing it, that it causes the virus to mutate and the mutated virus then multiplies and spreads from the “vaccinated” host. So in that scenario, being vaccinated actually makes you both more susceptible to the virus and more capable of spreading it to others. We’re currently seeing multiple signs that this appears to be what is happening.
His conclusion was that if ADE is occurring, the vaccination program must be stopped immediately.
The mRNA jab is a package in a nano lipid or fat envelope delivered to a cell. It’s a medical device designed to stimulate a cell into becoming a pathogen creator by creating the known to be harmful spike protein.
Vaccine is a defined term in law and under CDC and FDA standards. A vaccine has to stimulate an immunity in the person receiving it. And it must also disrupt transmission. That’s not what this is. Even the drug manufacturers admit the jab or its mRNA does not stop transmission.
The jab is a treatment, but if it’s discussed as a treatment it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health officials because people would ask what other treatments there are. And alternative treatments would hamper FDA’s ability to issue emergency approval of the jabs as a vaccine.
Defining the narrative with the term vaccine is a sucker punch to open and free discourse. “Vaccine” throws the discussion into one of pro/con vaccine. The jab is a mechanical device in the form of a very small packet of technology inserted intoe the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogenetic spike protein manufacturing site.
No basis exists to stipulate this is a vaccine. Simply put, this is a chemical pathogen device meant to unleash chemical pathogen production within a cell. It’s a medical device (a bio-weapon), not a drug. The jab is not a living or biologic system, but rather a physical technology that just happens to come in the size of a molecular package.
Stated Objective
As to why the vaccine propaganda, the most important quote of this SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a quote made in 2015 by Peter Daszak.
Duszak is long-time collaborator with Dr. Fauci and NIAID on gain of function research.
Duszak in 2015 said, “We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”
See Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Catastrophic Events; Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation; Forum on Microbial Threats; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Board on Global Health; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases: Enabling Sustainable Capabilities Through Ongoing Public- and Private-Sector Partnerships: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 Feb 12. 6, Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses.
It’s not hard to figure that SARS-Cov-2 was not a public health crisis. This was an opportunistic marketing campaign to address a stated objective. And it’s the easiest thing to describe because they are the ones that said it. And the Ocham’s Razor reality is they've said they needed to get the public to accept a pan-coronavirus vaccine countermeasure. And they needed the media to create the hype and investors would follow where they see profit.
When I see a person wearing a ski mask, waiving a gun, and standing with a bag of money in front of a bank; I will make the assumption that that person might be a bank robber.
Similarly, if I have somebody who says we need to use the media to hype a medical countermeasure which is in fact the injection of a synthetic, recombinant chimeric protein developed off of a computer simulation, I’m actually going to listen to the motivation for why that might be being done; I will listen to the person doing the manipulation who says investors will follow where they see profit.
You do not have anything else you need to rely on to explain the events of the last 20 months than the actual statement of the actual perpetrators.
Significant change in message!
“Biden gave credit to Trump for getting the vaccine’
That means they are prepping to blame Trump when the full horrow show of these FRANKENSTEIN vaccines can’t be covered up.
“Victory has a thound fathers but failure is an orphan.”
So the article holds up Dr. Malone as an expert on mRNA vaccines?
Yet he is wrong in calling it a vaccine?
Cheating on elections and cheating on vaccines. That what the country gets!
There were no long term, phase 3 studies completed. Those are still technically in process and the EUA can’t be lifted until those are complete and they have FDA review. By law the moment that status is revoked in current state, not one of those vaccines can be given. They are skating the regulations. Formal trial results I believe are expected early to mid 2023 at which point they will go through review. Probably fast tracked.
The conversation is about whether we’re having a vaccine for a virus. The fact is the matter is we’re not. We are injecting a spike protein mRNA sequence which is a computer simulation, it’s not derived from nature, it’s a computer simulation of a sequence which has been known and patented for years.
There is no evidence that the delta variant is somehow distinct from anything else on GISAID. The fact that we are now looking for a thing/variant doesn’t mean that it is a thing/variant because we are looking at fragments of a strand of genetic material and the fact is that we can choose any fragment in the genome sequence and call it a thing/variant.
For example, I could come up with "variant omega" tomorrow and I could say I’m looking for this sub-strand of either DNA or mRNA, or even a protein, and I could run around the world saying “fear the omega variant.”
The problem is because of the nature of the way in which we currently sequence genomes, which is actually a compositing process – it’s what we can call in mathematics an interleaving – we don’t have any point of reference to actually to know whether or not the thing we’re looking at is in fact distinct from either clinical or even genomic sense.
And so we’re trapped in a world where unfortunately if you go and look at the papers that isolated the delta variant and actually asked the question is the delta variant anything other than a selection of a sequence in a systematic shift of an already disclosed other sequence, the answer is it’s just an alteration and when you start and stop what you call the reading frame. There is no novel anything.
Maybe stop drinking the CDC Koolaid.
Dr. Malone is truly an idiot. Covid deaths are down 90%, from 3,000 per day to 300. The recent increase in cases is not leading to a proportionate increase in deaths. Case have gone from 12,000 per day 6 weeks ago to 30,000 per day 2 weeks ago, a 250% increase. Deaths have gone from 230 per day to 300, only a 30% increase. That’s because 1) vaccinated, if they get Covid, have less severe disease and 2) those who didn’t get vaccinated are younger and healthier, no co-morbidities. The death rate has gone from 1.7% to 1%. In the UK the death rate is now .2%. 150 million are vaccinated, if there were ADE we would be seeing it in the death rate. The vaccine saved 200k lives already, stop posting Malone’s idiotic garbage.
Where’s Impimp?
Repost of a link I shared a few months ago, where I first heard of ADE, and how it was to blame for all the lab animals dying in previous trials…
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/294852
Messenger RNA is an intermediary between gene and protein and the protein elicits the immune response, not the RNA. The contents of this shot being given on an experimental basis is a synthetic messenger RNA that is inserted into the human system to activate the cell to manufacture, in this case, a spike protein. [7] An mRNA vaccine is not a vaccine, because it does not elicit an immune response.
There are a number of prominent concerns of serious adverse reactions of which include, in brief summary, some of the following:
In previous clinical trials since the 1960’s [8] attempts to vaccinate against RSV, [9] Dengue, [10] SARS and MERS, the studies each failed during the animal phase. Cats, ferrets, monkeys, and rabbits each and every time experienced Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), also known as pathogenic priming or a cytokine storm. This occurs when the immune system creates an uncontrolled and overwhelming inflammatory response upon being confronted with the pathogen in the real world, and the outcome, tragically, is death.
The same immune system overreaction took place in a number of infants in clinical trials who received an attempted RSV shot, as well as some six hundred Filipino children who died following early vaccination against Dengue [11] and it remains a viable concern today. [12]
Autoimmune disease occurs when the body’s immune system can’t tell the difference between its own cells and foreign cells, and causes the body to attack its normal cells. [13] It has been suggested that “molecular mimicry” may contribute to this problem, with antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 cross-reacting with structurally similar host protein sequences and raising an acute autoimmune response against them. [14]
Scientists have determined that the same spike protein found in SARS viruses are also responsible for the development of the placenta in mammals, including humans, and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy. If a woman’s body is primed to attack these protein spikes, the immune system may prevent a placenta from being formed, which would render that woman infertile. [15]
Drs Yeadon and Wodarg further explain; “To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included. According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of post vaccination infertility could be observed.” [16]
We have additionally heard the reports of multiple cases of Bell’s Palsy in both trials [17] and administration, numerous cases of anaphylaxis shock even when no previous allergies were detected, as well as several announced incidents of “false positive” HIV tests. [18]
The remaining elephant in the room is that of the greatest unknown, of tampering with the human genome. There is much we have yet to comprehend of the complexity of the human body and immune system. Science has gotten it wrong many times before, having made assumptions about its ability to exert its dominance over nature. It is still and always nature which has the final say. In the human genome project they tried genetic engineering by changing a singular gene which they believed was the defect in the genetic process. Unexpectedly, instead of correcting, it caused a domino effect of uncontrolled regulation onto multiple other genes.
Pfiizer, Moderna, Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Soumya Swaminathan, the WHO’s chief scientist, have made it abundantly clear that the novel mRNA strand entering the cell is not intended to stop transmission but rather as a treatment. However, were we at long last permitted to hold public discourse on the profoundly viable and formerly ubiquitous treatments such as Ivermectin, [20] for one example, and were these treatments not denied us both in access and scientific data but disseminated to the global community, we might not have had need for an emergency use technology at all.
Novacula Occami.
Consider the population control agenda of both the source and financial backing of the disease and the cures. There is your answer, no need to complicate the question anymore than that.
Would they? The answer is yes they would and are.
These vaccines are going to go down in history as crimes against humanity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.