Posted on 10/15/2021 5:08:03 AM PDT by Red Badger
That is hilarious.
“BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds
AND little bitty aliens.
AND little bitty computer parts.
AND computer chips.
AND who knows what else.
From the article:
“
Strickler said that before Covid she had enjoyed her job as a product inspector but that since the pandemic began many employees have “vaccine regret” after getting the shots and “a lot of people refused to get it. In fact, over half of the employees are willing to walk out over this and Pfizer knows that.”
“
When is the deadline for Pfizer employees to get the shots?
Timelining it to see what the news says about the company, shortly after the deadline passes.
Get out from under that rock. Come out of that cave.
Several studies of the vaxxines and the blood from COVID/VAX victims have taken photos through electron microscopes showing all the debris including metals, strands, colors/changing colors, foreign bodies that look like little aliens and MOVE.
There is no denying this now.
Go back in your cave and crawl under your rock.
Hey, gas_bag dr, I posted this to Palmer, but let me apply it to you.
Get out from under that rock. Come out of that cave.
Several studies of the vaxxines and the blood from COVID/VAX victims have taken photos through electron microscopes showing all the debris including metals, strands, colors/changing colors, foreign bodies that look like little aliens and MOVE.
There is no denying this now.
Go back in your cave and crawl under your rock.
“FWIW, lucifer is Latin for “lightbearer.” Yes, I understand the biblical context, but in this case, luciferase is a bioluminescent protein, hence the reference.”
TY, You learn something new every day. I will no longer use the term “Lucifer” to refer to Satan the Devil.
“It is only in the later English Christian tradition that “Lucifer” became a proper noun referring to the Devil before his fall, which the Hebrew does not do.”
Luciferase...the Devil’s enzyme!
Names are important when dealing with legalities.
Comirnaty has full approval, thus legally can be mandated (but its not yet available).
PfizerBiontech is still under EUA, thus legally -cannot- be mandated (but its available).
Before you call people ignorant, luciferase puts out light, as in bioluminesce, unlike the reflective examples you gave.
I did some searching and found that the purpose of the luciferase is added to the vaxxine indeed to be read by a device.
Thanks for the info!
You wrote:
“The
products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness”
I wonder what the “certain differences” are?
Comirnaty able to be mandated and Pfizer legally liable for harms, due to not being under EUA?
PfizerBiontech not able to be mandated and Pfizer not legally liable for harms, due to being under EUA?
It's like the song on the Your Tender Loving Care album, What a Lyre I Am.
Eh, what DO I know? :)
Gas_bag dr,
I assume you got the jabs. Was yours the one with all the “junk” in it or was it the one with just saline solution?
There was nothing in mine. I didn’t/won’t get the jabs BECAUSE my life/health depends on my NOT getting it.
At this point, where we know that vaxxines don’t work, don’t last, spread breakthrough COVID, CREATE variants, KILL people, sterilize people, kill babies in the womb and nursing babies, cause ADE, blood clots, heart problems, chronic pain, and an untold number of SERIOUS side effects.
Why would ANYONE get these vaxxines or advocate that ANYONE get them?
It’s a rhetorical question. That means I already know the answer to the question, so I don’t need/want you to respond and more importantly, I don’t care what you think.
143,000 people? In a Single town? EVERYONE gets the shot?
That means it is still in the experimental/development stage. Right?
I know, right? This statement really got to me: “To test the effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine in a ‘real-life scenario,’”
So, the hundreds of millions of shots that have already been given weren’t “real-life scenarios?”
I thought as much, even before I hit the post button, but my (and I would imagine most people’s) familiarity with enzymes is the mention of digestive enzymes, but thank you for the clarification. I definitely did not know there were so many enzymes in the human body.
It doesn’t change my question though. If luciferase is an enzyme, what does it catalyze or what chemical reaction does it enhance?
This looked like complete bunk right from the start, so I really ask the question mostly in jest, but they chose the word enzyme. I am curious why.
article grossly conflates and confuses biofluorescence and bioluminescence
bioluminescence results when an enzyme like luciferase and a substrate like luciferin are mixed, resulting in the emission of a burst of light until the substrate is consumed, and requires no external light source to function. fireflies are the quintessential example of .
biofluorescence generally results in the absorption of some existing light spectrum and then subsequent emission of said spectrum, though sometimes shifted to a different color spectrum ... biofluorescence often occurs in normally non-visibible light spectrums and requires darkened conditions and/or special filters for the subsequent emissions to be seen ...
Tagline.
WildHighlander57 wrote: “Names are important when dealing with legalities. Comirnaty has full approval, thus legally can be mandated (but its not yet available).”
Can you explain how things that are interchangeable and identical cannot be the same thing?
Pretending that Pfizer BioNTech cannot be mandated because of the labeling is a false hope that will be disappointing.
Beware the honey pot / false flag / fake-planted-whistleblower (both lies and truths told to discredit everything)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.