Skip to comments.
Supreme Court won't take up Catholic hospital appeal over surgery for transgender man
NBC News / Comcast ^
| November 1, 2021
| By Pete Williams
Posted on 11/01/2021 1:00:48 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
SCOTUS = Supreme Clowns Of The US
2
posted on
11/01/2021 1:02:41 PM PDT
by
antidemoncrat
(somRead more at: https://economicti Astronomers see white dwarf 'switch on and off' for first time)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
So the appeal went to SCOTUS before state made a ruling is that it?
Is this just a procedure rejection?
3
posted on
11/01/2021 1:02:54 PM PDT
by
Bayard
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If they bend on this they will have to bend on everything. They should refuse and dare the govt to close them down.
4
posted on
11/01/2021 1:03:24 PM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(Arrest and charge Anthony Fauci. )
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I can’t keep up with the terminology. Does “transgender man” mean “woman”? Or is it something even more psychotically devious? I mean I don’t doubt that there’s a man crazy enough to pretend to be a woman and then demand a hysterectomy to “validate” himself/herself/itself.
5
posted on
11/01/2021 1:07:44 PM PDT
by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: Oldeconomybuyer
A Catholic hospital won’t do a hysterectomy on a woman for sterilization purposes, although a medical justification is not hard to identify in a large number of cases.
6
posted on
11/01/2021 1:07:57 PM PDT
by
I-ambush
(If we make it we’ll all sit back and laugh, but I fear tomorrow I’ll be crying)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
the hospital was refusing to treat me simply because of who I am No, ya goof, they were refusing to remove a healthy organ to pander to your mental illness. It had nothing to do with "who you are". If you went to them and asked them to remove your thumb because you thought it would look cool to have a hand without a thumb, they would have refused that also.
7
posted on
11/01/2021 1:08:01 PM PDT
by
Campion
(What part of "shall not be infringed" don't they understand?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
OK...One more time....
A “transgender man” is really a woman playing like she’s a man...Right????
8
posted on
11/01/2021 1:08:35 PM PDT
by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
The Supreme Court on Monday turned down an appeal from a Catholic hospital in California that was sued after refusing to perform a hysterectomy for a transgender man.
"He can't have a baby, but he has the right to have one!" -- Monty Python
9
posted on
11/01/2021 1:08:48 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Justice could be served by allowing the tranny to claim the operation was necessary because it identified as a woman again.
Or it could just go to a non-Catholic hospital. But that's not really the point, is it?
10
posted on
11/01/2021 1:09:18 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
..." a hysterectomy for a transgender man." ?
11
posted on
11/01/2021 1:09:41 PM PDT
by
yoe
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Any “religious” concerns do not compute with this Supreme Court. At least in reference to Christian religions.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Rat Party Headquarters wants to put every Catholic hospital...and every Catholic school...out of business. And they'll stop at nothing...legal,or illegal.
To: Seruzawa
Yeah...That’s what I asked also...I can’t keep up with all these “pronouns” and stuff...
14
posted on
11/01/2021 1:10:23 PM PDT
by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
To: yoe
IOW...a deeply delusional...and/or depraved...woman.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If the hospital performed hysterectomies for any reason besides medical necessity they put themselves in this position. If their policy did not permit hysterectomies for sterilization their defense is valid and plain common sense.
16
posted on
11/01/2021 1:11:11 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Homosexuals love going to Catholic institutions/businesses solely for the purpose of suing them and destroying them.
17
posted on
11/01/2021 1:11:26 PM PDT
by
Trillian
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Maybe they refused because there was no medical necessity to perform a hysterectomy on a perfectly healthy woman, no matter what delusions she is operating under. This entire thing is just too insane.
It’s only going to get worse. We aren’t even close to plumbing the depths of this perverted insanity.
18
posted on
11/01/2021 1:12:29 PM PDT
by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: JBW1949
>>>I can’t keep up with all these “pronouns” and stuff...<<<
It’s easier when you remember that they ALL fall under the general heading of Sodomite.
19
posted on
11/01/2021 1:13:08 PM PDT
by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: Seruzawa
The confusion vanishes when you understand that it means “make-believe” or “fake” in Newspeak.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson