A life-long Democrat, Adams said he would no longer vote for the party. “They’ll never get another vote from me and I’m telling the workers here the same thing.”
_________________________________________________________
It sure would be nice if our votes actually mattered anymore. Don’t worry, Adams, a Democrat thug will have already voted for you.
Acts 9:18 - - And immediately there fell from his eyes something like scales, and he received sight forthwith...
Two Textron workers who requested religious exemptions told Reuters the company’s human resources representatives quizzed them on the name of their church leaders and asked detailed questions about their faith.
—
Why, that doesn’t sound the least bit intrusive in one’s personal life.
How does an unconstitutional “mandate:, replace constitutional rule?
pookie18
Aircraft quality machinists are NOT easy to replace.
Schools today don’t want ANY MATH standards.
Like the General said.....”the only good tyrant is a dead tyrant
SPECIAL WORLDWIDE CALL TO PEACEFUL PROTEST
This is a very powerful speech by a very brave lady.
https://www.brighteon.com/4cd8219a-6656-4caa-a383-93bacf114abb
FINALLY!
A WORLDWIDE PROTEST
NOV 3
So many people have been waiting for a Leader to announce a
Worldwide Counter offensive to resist peacefully against the One World Order.
Stand with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., in unison with People Around
the World!
https://www.brighteon.com/d292ba4a-a04a-4d50-851d-a9515f420b50
IT IS STILL NOT TOO LATE!
“no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States”
You can be an atheist and still legally object to such a religious test.
“...the company’s human resources representatives quizzed them on the name of their church leaders and asked detailed questions about their faith.”
THIS is PATENTLY ILLEGAL.
Workers grilled about particulars of their faith in some sort of HR fishing expedition to try to invalidate an employee’s access to Religious Exemption should sue, sue, sue, and sue some more. I mean — this has been ruled on, already; there’s established precedent in Law. You DO NOT have to be a member of ANY recognized religious organization. Nor do your specific beliefs have to mesh with the stated “Articles of Faith” or whatever, of any religious organization you might claim association with.
Yes, it REALLY IS that straightforward. You could claim Religious Exemption because you fervently believe that mRNA technology profanes the human genome, and your religious belief absolutely bars your acceptance of any mRNA-related substance into your body, and absolutely bars your becoming complicit in said profanity by consenting to accept the injections.
Fetal cells could have been obtained using ultrasounds of the pelvic regions of recently pregnant women who have died on operating tables after say auto accidents.
Cells from murdered babies need not have been used for vaccine development.
So-called ethical drug makers should avoid the use of cells from murdered babies.
This is an unprecedented political climate in which conservative, MAGA Republicans cannot lose. The only thing that can screw it up is making the mistake of listening to the Karl Roves and Mitch McConnells of the world.
This is a really bad precedent, and it has to be stopped; we are employees, not chattel.
Someone sounded an alarm, and was mocked for having done so, way back when “Personnel” became “Human Resources.”
“It’s ONLY a name change, after all”; they said as they rolled their eyes at the fool.
Yesterday’s fool is now acclaimed a prophet.
There must be an inviolable barrier dividing our lives and our choices from those of our employer, and that line has historically — with great wisdom — been drawn at the bounds of the administration of our own personal affairs: home, finance, health, education, the welfare of our children, our leisure pursuits, and the disposition of our property.
Manifestly, however, that great dam has been breached, and now the leak must be stopped. Floodwaters know no bounds, and the servility that lies at the logical terminus of this policy paradigm is thoroughly impermissible.
Shall we wait and see what else becomes policy? Perhaps internal combustion engines will not be permitted on company property. Maybe policy will require that no employee may smoke, or drink, or enjoy hazardous recreational activities. How long before all employees MUST use public transit? Or reside within 20 miles of the firm?
“Aww, go on; that’s ridiculous,” you say. But wasn’t this present policy imagined to be ridiculous in very vivid, recent memory? And yet — here we are, and this paradigm — permitted to continue — can be extended to the furthest recesses of everyone’s personal lives; and, make no mistake, there will always be a noble-sounding rationale for every next step.
Consider: If a paradigm fails at ANY point, the paradigm fails at EVERY point. If the fully developed paradigm yields an unacceptable outcome; the yield of its infancy is likewise unacceptable. Or, to borrow the parable: baby dragons grow to be great, and terribly deadly adult dragons; which is why we give no quarter to baby dragons.
Well, there’s a dragon running loose around here, and you should know that you are crunchy, and taste good with ketchup.