Posted on 02/12/2022 2:28:43 PM PST by janetjanet998
Yep that’s true always has been
More details
https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/26/6-new-revelations-from-the-john-durham-spygate-probe/
6. Wait! WHAT?
Near the end of the special counsel’s 19-page discovery update and extension request came the fifth takeaway: something strange is going on in the Office of Inspector General.
According to yesterday’s filing, on December 17, 2021, the OIG provided the special counsel’s office a written forensic report concerning a “cyber-related matter” that Sussmann had told an OIG special agent in charge about. Specifically, in early 2017, Sussmann told the OIG agent that one of his “clients had observed that a specific OIG employee’s computer was ‘seen publicly’ in ‘Internet traffic’ and was connecting to a Virtual Private Network in a foreign country.”
When the OIG office provided Durham’s team the “forensic report,” it represented “that it had ‘no other file[] or other documentation’ relating to this cyber matter.”
However, one week ago, Sussmann’s attorneys informed Durham’s team that Sussmann had, in fact, personally met with the DOJ’s inspector general in March 2017, when he passed on the tip about the OIG employee’s connection to a foreign VPN. While Sussmann had not told the OIG his client’s name at the time, last week his lawyers informed Durham’s team that it was Tech Executive-1, i.e., Joffe, who had discovered the OIG employee’s computer connecting to a VPN in a foreign country.
Upon learning this news, Durham’s team promptly contacted the OIG again and learned, for the first time, that Sussmann had met with both the inspector general and his then-general counsel in March 2017 about the above-described cyber matter. Since then, including over this last weekend, the OIG has been providing further documentation related to that meeting to the special counsel’s office.
So many questions! First, why did the OIG not inform the special counsel’s office that Sussmann had met with both the inspector general and his then-general counsel? And why did the OIG falsely represent that there was no “further documentation”? Sure, it could have been accidental, but given that Durham’s attorneys publicly exposed this “mistake,” it suggests something more is afoot.
Then there is the question of the veracity of the claim and what happens to the investigation. Was there really an OIG employee connecting on a foreign VPN? Who was it? Why? Did the OIG ever find out?
What about Joffe: How in the world did he discover the OIG employee’s computer connecting to a VPN in a foreign country? Was Joffe monitoring other government computers? How? Why? Was anyone else involved? Who knew?
These questions seem significant given that Sussmann’s meeting with the OIG occurred in March 2017, putting the “discovery” during the Trump administration and ongoing Crossfire Hurricane investigation. With questions like these just arising now, no wonder Durham isn’t done yet with his investigation.
And they wanted to get Nixon since his involvement with HUAC.
Statement from Trump on the latest from Special Counsel John Durham.
https://twitter.com/thebias_news/status/1492647845215629321/photo/1
The media is in on the scam.
.
You nailed it!
95% of DC News can be explained by your post.
.
.
If you have noticed, you don’t see the Networks attacking Durham on a nightly basis (ala Starr).
They know he’s no threat. They’re standing down.
.
No..I don’t see the connection.
You left out Dean who started the operation
Post 42
Very good questions.
The OIG only answers the question asked. If Frau Durham is too slow or lazy to ask that is not the concern of the OIG.
lol...I lmao whenever you start wrecking Durham.
Yes I did. I left out others but my failure to include Dean was a big mistake:
John Dean: He helped cover up the Nixon administration’s involvement in the Watergate break-in and illegal intelligence-gathering. After the arrests of the burglars, Dean took custody of evidence and money from the White House safe of E. Howard Hunt, who had been in charge of the burglaries, and later destroyed some of the evidence before it could be found by investigators.
It was a presentation by G. Gordon Liddy (counsel for CREEP and a former FBI agent) that brought forth a preliminary plan for intelligence-gathering operations during the campaign. This presentation was attended by Dean, Jeb Magruder (Deputy Director of the Committee to Re-Elect the President(CREEP), and Attorney General, John Mitchell. Reaction to Liddy's plan was highly unfavorable. Liddy was ordered to scale down his ideas and he presented a revised plan to the same group on February 4, which was approved by Mitchell in March. This revised plan led, eventually, to attempts to eavesdrop on the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters at the Watergate. However, the eavesdropping equipment failed on the first attempt and a second attempt caused the burglars to be caught red-handed.
So Dean did know of the plan, firsthand. I don't think he managed the details of the plan. For his part he was charged with obstruction of justice and served four months in prison.
He’s absolutely right. All of it.
Gee, that seems like a crime or something
🤔🤔🤔
Eric Ciaremella and friends
bump
No, they are just hoping Russia invades Ukraine so they can ignore this.
Sussman should be indicted for conspiracy to commit fraud in the election. If he continued to work his fraud after President Trump was inaugurated, then it is sedition, punishable by death.
Ditto to the max.
G Gordon said it was Dean’s operation from the start and that Dean would be connected to one of the whores the Dems were ysing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.