Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Democrats introduce bill requiring Mandatory Vaccination for every employee…
Citizen Free Press ^ | 02/12/2022

Posted on 02/12/2022 8:39:53 PM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: SeekAndFind
All the state employees are Democrats. How many will the jab kill?

How is this a Bad Thing? Fer sh!t's sake, they keep fiddle f&cking with the formula, and now they want to continue the jabs forever, every four months, to infinitude.

It's a cull, and we will be able to move in and mop up the leftover Stupids.

21 posted on 02/12/2022 11:26:12 PM PST by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

These jerks live in a black hole. The entire planet is protesting against this crap, and these clowns are upping the ante on vaccinations.


22 posted on 02/12/2022 11:29:18 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

yep


23 posted on 02/12/2022 11:31:26 PM PST by GOP Poet (Super cool you can change your tag line EVERYTIME you post!! :D. (Small things make me happy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Wicks’ proposal is just the latest of several far-reaching measures introduced by Democratic state lawmakers this year. Among others, Sen. Scott Wiener would allow children 12 and up to be vaccinated without their parents’ consent, while Sen. Richard Pan would eliminate a personal belief exemption for schools.

Good grief, these people are nasty and evil.

24 posted on 02/12/2022 11:32:25 PM PST by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
May be an image of one or more people and text that says 'THE KOOLAID ONLY WORKS IF EVERYONE DRINKS IT JIM JONES'
25 posted on 02/12/2022 11:40:47 PM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

and every employee moves to another state ...


26 posted on 02/12/2022 11:57:25 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)

Primary Holding

A state may enact a compulsory vaccination law, since the legislature has the discretion to decide whether vaccination is the best way to prevent smallpox and protect public health. The legislature may exempt children from the law without violating the equal protection rights of adults if the law applies equally among adults.

Facts:

A Massachusetts law provided that the board of health of a city or town may require and enforce vaccination and revaccination of its inhabitants, while providing them with a way to get free vaccinations. The state imposed a $5 fine for people over 21 who violated this law, although it provided an exception for children with a doctor's certificate stating that they are not fit for vaccination. The city of Cambridge adopted a regulation requiring all of its inhabitants who were not vaccinated against smallpox in the last five years to be vaccinated or revaccinated. (This was based on the increasing presence of smallpox in the city.) A certain physician was authorized to enforce the vaccination policy. The plaintiff in this case was an individual over 21 who refused to comply with the vaccination requirement and then faced a criminal complaint. He was found guilty and fined, and the court ordered him held in custody until the fine was paid.

Majority

John Marshall Harlan (Author, Melville Weston Fuller, Henry Billings Brown, Edward Douglass White, Joseph McKenna, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., William Rufus Day

Harlan ruled that the vaccination law did not violate the 14th Amendment because the police power of the state may be allowed to constrain individual liberties through reasonable regulations when required to protect public safety. He reasoned that individual liberty does not allow people to take actions regardless of the harm that they could cause to others. Harlan felt that the plaintiff had failed to show that the vaccination law was arbitrary or oppressive, or not reasonably required for the safety of the public. He noted the increasing presence of smallpox, which prevented the plaintiff from convincingly asserting that the rule had no real or substantial relation to protecting public health and safety. Although the plaintiff presented evidence that some doctors believed that the smallpox vaccine was not effective and could cause further diseases, Harlan pointed out that the opposite view represents the common medical belief and is followed by more reputable doctors.

27 posted on 02/13/2022 12:52:20 AM PST by jonrick46 (Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks introduced her bill....

.....also brought her baby to Assembly when denied voting by proxy.


28 posted on 02/13/2022 1:23:45 AM PST by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Continuing their self destruction, these Democrats are!


29 posted on 02/13/2022 1:39:06 AM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Figures )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
"Birds of a Feather".....


30 posted on 02/13/2022 1:49:21 AM PST by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

....”Wicks’ proposal is just the latest of several far-reaching,[bat-sh*t crazy, loonie-to-the-extreme, nonsensical, unreasonable] measures introduced by Democratic state lawmakers this year.....”

there....! fixed that....!!


31 posted on 02/13/2022 4:40:31 AM PST by TokarevM57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Already ruled unconstitional. Effing little dictators.


32 posted on 02/13/2022 5:11:09 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

Already ruled unconstitional. Effing little dictators.

********************************************

Unfortunately, I think they only ruled on the federal government imposing mandates. They still left the question open for the states.


33 posted on 02/13/2022 5:19:18 AM PST by kara37 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

oh to own a uhaul franchise in CA


34 posted on 02/13/2022 7:34:14 AM PST by joshua c (Dump the LEFT. Cable tv, Big tech, national name brands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The COVID gold mine is going to be around for a while democrats haven’t had a money laundering gig this good for a long time.


35 posted on 02/13/2022 9:34:07 AM PST by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

These California leftist Democrats are totally insane and must be exposed, challenged and every effort made to kick them out of office. Portraying them as psychopathic totalitarians is the best Alinsky-like tactic to use - ridicule and comparing to known psychopaths such as Rev. Comrade Jim Jones of Jonestown or Nazi. Concentration camp doctor Mengele.


36 posted on 02/13/2022 11:09:58 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Figures )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson