Posted on 02/15/2022 8:01:00 AM PST by Red Badger
Yeah. That’s why I kept it brief by using the plural Noun version. The nefarious multitudes of sub sets to those enterprises are too plenty to list.
“Gray Lady”, “Paper of Record”, etc. They sure hold themselves in high esteem, don’t they?
This story will still get you killed six ways to Marc Rich and Vince Foster.
Their noses are so high in the air they need oxygen masks just to breathe...................
Justice is slow, very slow, but very sure....................
Their automaton readers will star smoking like Rosie the Robot when information is inserted that it cannot compute.
Unless you're unmasking someone before the FISA Court requesting a warrant, that is.....That's luckily split.
HIlliary is a CONTROL FREAK!! NOTHING happened in that group that she didn’t know of!!
“The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine.” - Anon........................
Nations hostile to US➡️Soros➡️Clintons➡️Democrat Party➡️Press
Yet they think they're the smartest people on earth.
They did that to Trump many times.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/07/trump-putin-russia-collusion.html
The NYT had no problem expending almost 10,000 words in a single piece to “explain” Trump’s Russia collusion.
They will be implicated. We will see if Durham has the balls to take them on.
Nice set of links, thanks!
The Friday night before the Super Bowl, no less. Close to the ultimate burying of a story.
Therefore pardon me for not falling all over myself with excitement. Of course I’ll be ecstatic if we see more indictments, but what he mentioned Friday could have resulted in more indictments, by itself, yet didn’t. Ratcliffe sounds a little desperate for more indictments as well, by coming out as he did. John Solomon was just on Bannon’s show saying likely mastermind Marc Elias could actually be state’s witness at this point against bagholder Sussman. What a joke that would be.
The problem is, will the American people ever choose to believe it?
Facebook, Twitter, and I don’t know who else are shutting dissent down. They won’t give the truth a forum, just like the mainstream media, which has been omitting and twisting facts for at least a generation.
True story: my Dad only had access to ABC, NBC, and CBS back in the day.
He didn’t have cable tv, internet, or listen to Rush on the radio, so all he had was one version of what was going on in the world. He voted Democrat, mostly, however he would tell me “I vote for the man, not the party” which didn’t make any sense to me because if you vote for the man, you ARE voting for the party.
I asked him; Dad, (Mom and Dad had their own business at one time) you didn’t like the govt. raising your taxes, did you? No, he replied.
You didn’t like OSHA coming in and telling you what to do, did you? No.
You don’t want the govt. taking your guns away? No.
You think abortion is wrong, don’t you? Yes.
I told him, Dad, you’re a conservative.
His response-“ You’re full of XXXX!
He thought every democrat was FDR.
I have a visceral hatred for the “ mainstream” media.
I remember I was making a delivery for my Dad, and was listening to WBBM radio in Chicago broadcasting the Watergate hearings live when I heard Alexander Butterfield mention the existence of tape recordings of Nixon’s conversations in the Oval Office regarding the break-in at the Watergate Hotel.
One of the senators asked, WHAT tapes?
Listening to history in the making..
.....So what was The Times’ excuse? The revelations, according to national security and legal policy correspondent Charlie Savage, “tend to involve dense and obscure issues, so dissecting them requires asking readers to expend significant mental energy and time.”......
I’m glad that I’m not a NYT reader!!!!
NYT: “All the news we fit to print”!!!!
So what was The Times’ excuse? The revelations, according to national security and legal policy correspondent Charlie Savage, “tend to involve dense and obscure issues, so dissecting them requires asking readers to expend significant mental energy and time.”
TRANSLATION: NOBODY AT THE NEW YORK TIMES UNDERSTOOD WHAT HAPPENED. NOT HAVING THE ABILITY TO COMPREHEND ABOVE A TEN YEAR OLD, THE TIMES HAD ...NO REPORTERS WHO QUALIFIED.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.