Throughout history cities have always been a place where people lived in poverty crowded into slums. They had to in order to live, the poor didn’t have the resources to live in rural areas alone. The rich had country estates so they could escape from the noise, crime, and filth of the cities. The automobile changed that, now the middle class could get away from cities into a healthier environment offering a better life for their families. Leftists don’t like that, the middle class abandoning the cities means taking their money with them, money that leftist governments want in their pockets. That’s what’s behind the push to get rid of cars and force people into relying upon public transportation. Force the middle class back into cities where they can be controlled better along with their money.
“Water seeks its own level.”
In nature things naturally seek balance and equilibrium. Conservative humans tend to do the same. Leftists however irrationally flirt with discord, disunity, and destruction.
The largest city I ever lived in was Seattle. I hated it. I was always on-guard and could never reach a state of relaxation. I also tried a rural area where it was ten miles from anywhere. I enjoyed some aspects of the seclusion but ultimately bought a home in a suburb where I was able to strike a balance.
Conservatives find things that work for them and recommend them to their friends. Leftists find things that reinforce their ideology and demand that everyone do things the same way.
BTW, Houston has so many walking trails that there is a website ranking the Top 67 of them.
The Borg would love this hive minded wimp. I absolutely love living rural and do not find it difficult to find and make friends. City rat maze living is not for me. Have at it 15 of 21.7
I live in an area with virtually no public transit, and I wouldn’t have it any other way.
Agenda 21 ping
Muizz Akhtar. Foreigner.
This author obviously doesn’t live in the human connected area of Houston just outside the convention center.