Posted on 09/18/2022 8:01:11 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
‘Clearly’ Liz Cheney lost her election.
Who cares what that bitter hag loser says about the guy she tried to (politically) kill and ended up (politically) dead herself?
They think that using the word, “clearly”, before making a false statement gives it validity. [smh]
Is that harridan still screeching? She reeeeally needs to shut it.
The emotional knee-jerk reactions are missing the important point here: She is telegraphing the intent to charge Trump with a crime. No doubt they will try to do this before the mid-term elections. The J6 fascists have said they are coming back into session before the mid-terms, which is unusual.
Trump would have already done a perp walk if the Democrats had a case.
Perhaps a fundraising angle is involved.
Like an athlete on a cereal box, private citizen Trump should insist on a cut of the revenue.
Since when is it a crime to say, “something looks awfully fishy.. let’s look into this..”???
She needs a straight jacket.
Then bring charges!! Or are they still trying to manipulate a “no defense” trial in court?
Cite the code chapter and verse, then prove it. They never do and never will.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
This is merely a (probably partial) listing of possibly applicable law and no inference that Trump committed a related crime should be made:
18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798
(d)Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e)Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f)Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
As for the Georgia election, it was officially certified as being completed, over and done with.
Clearly, there is no proof.
“Do you think, as a personal opinion and an attorney, that there are criminal offenses?”
I wonder if the Wyoming Bar would like to chat with her. Bar associations are just so concerned about unsubstantiated election claims nowadays.
That don’t matter to Liz and the other liberals.
Please cite in the US code the laws he broke exactly. Wait, you can’t.
Being the leftist media RINO darling is a short lived experience, enjoy it while you are able.
I have a cousin that specializes in moving large objects, maybe we could get him to make us a special price to move her rich, fat, screwball a$$ back to Wyoming.
Lizzard got creamed in the primary. Is she dense? Nobody cares what she thinks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.