There was collusion and there was election interference, a crime.
Oooos. My bad. Orange man lost, all is good.
It must be nice to get 12.5 million dollars to be fired.
Rick Santorum just said that ...it wasn’t CENCORING because their was no collusion with the government...
Either he did not read this morning’s Post or the FBI isn’t part of the government.
“Mistakes were made”
The Hillary defense.
Another great moment from the hearings today regarding Twitter banning into on Covid bioweapon jabs:
Where’d You Go to Medical School?’: GOP Rep Rips Ex-Twitter Official for Censoring Stanford Doc’s Covid Opinions
Gadde, former general counsel and head of legal, policy, and trust at Twitter, admitted under questioning that no one at the company had the medical standing to assess claims about Covid-mitigation strategies and vaccines so they instead deferred to CDC guidance and censored information that contradicted the agency’s guidance.
“You’re not a doctor, right, Ms. Gadde?” Mace asked.
“No, I’m not,” Gadde responded.
“What makes you think you or anyone else at Twitter have the medical expertise to censor actual, accurate, CDC data?”
“I’m not familiar with these particular situations,” Gadde said before Mace cut her off: “I’m sure you’re not.”
During the tense exchange, Mace accused Gadde and Twitter executives of shutting down Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford medical professor, who was critical of Covid-19 lockdowns.
“You guys censored Harvard-educated doctors, Stanford-educated doctors, doctors that are educated in the best places in the world, and you silenced those voices,” Mace said, referencing Bhattacharya.In early December, Bari Weiss released the second installment of “The Twitter Files,” which revealed that the social-media giant had created “secret blacklists” suppressing the presence of users deemed problematic.
think they’ll also admit that it was a “mistake” to censor everything about the covid vax EXCEPT that it was “safe and effective”?
Pregnant denials, lies, whatever else.
AT THIS POINT WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!
Give back the illegal or tainted campaign donations after the election was won, after it served its purpose. Nobody gives back the seat, just the money used to win the seat.
Apologize for the false news reporting after their issue succeeded or proposition was voted on. Nobody ever goes out of business for lack of credibility, they just do it again next time and then apologize again. (Nick Sandmann was a rare win for the right)
Cover up a major Democrat scandal to get the President elected, give awards to each other to sustain the idea that the reports were credible, and then apologize two years later when the truth finally breaks through the cover-up.
"It worked, didn't it?"
-PJ