The DC View
Posted on 02/24/2023 8:27:47 PM PST by hardspunned
Europe was already socialist. They have “hate speech” laws and don’t have Free Speech. They are self destructing and not worried about leftist ideas from us.
If you want traditional societies, they are in Asia, and they don’t seem to be the slightest upset about our leftist stupidity.
The idea that the world hates us for liberalism simply isn’t true.
No I asked when the person will finally shut up about a nuclear war, when it doesn’t happen.
And please, these people come on and name call before anyone even disagrees with them.
.
Biden got everything Wrong for 40 years.
Now, you’re gonna bet he’s right this time?
"...is your refrigerator running?"
Sod Off, Swampy, as the old saying goes.
The idea is to make sure it keeps ON not happening.
One nuke can ruin your whole day. https://nukemap.org/nukemap/
your cracked.
Ukraine is the place where the Biden Crime Family along with the progeny of Pelosi, Kerry, and Romney made money. Quid pro Joe got the Ukrainian prosecutor fired to stop the investigation of Burisma, which hired Hunter at 83k a month for over four years.
Trump was impeached due to a “perfect phone call” with Zelensky. He was set up by Ukrainian-born LtCol Vindmann and CIA analyst Ciaramella who had counseled VP Biden on Ukraine. Why did VP Biden travel to Ukraine during his last week in office?
Ukraine is the place that McCain and Graham traveled to in Dec 2016 and received medals from corrupt President Poroshenko. This dynamic duo were beating the war drums back then.
During the 2016 Presidential campaign the Ukrainian ambassador to the US got involved and expressed his dislike of Trump. The DNC was in active contact with the Ukrainian Embassy seeking dirt on Paul Manafort. Ukraine was part of the Mueller Russia hoax investigation. John Podesta’s brother was involved in Ukraine doing similar activities as Manafort, but he wasn’t prosecuted.
What about the US funded bio labs in Ukraine? What was Fauci’s involvement?
Maybe there is more to our current involvement in Ukraine than just defending its sovereignty. It seems that special interests may have a role in why we are willing to risk a direct confrontation with Russia and possible nuclear war to defend a poor, corrupt, oligarchy.
Lol!
you think people leading this coutry with drag shows and hormone injections are even half-educated and not insane. LOL.
Time is all it takes for a fool to damage everything in their path.
Youre an accomplice.
No, but neither do I believe that Europe is led by the "progeny of former NAZIS" or any "elite families of Europe."
Who are these "elite families"? Do you mean the houses of Windsor, Hapsburg, Rothschild, Warburg?
You sound like you're talking Bilderberg/Illuminati conspiracy stuff.
Big fat fingers 🤣🤣🤣
Neocons will root for war until we start to lose battles—then they will blame Trump (or some other scapegoat) Tucker might be singled out as why The enemy won. Then total Government pro-CCP control. Next two years will not be cool.
Dude as much as we have trouble with drag shows and hormone injecting, it has absolutely nothing to do with the war in Ukraine.
See this is the problem. If you think involvement in the war in Ukraine is unwise and you have some points to make that’s great.
But you just unloaded so much crazy in one paragraph that it’s not possible to take you seriously.
As for Tucker, he has such an absolute hard on for Ukraine to lose, but then you don’t want anyone to criticize him if Ukraine loses. Ok.
Bttt
>> Tucker: Good Evening and welcome to "Tucker Carlson tonight."
The war in Ukraine began a year ago today on February 24th, 2022, when the Russian military rolled across the eastern border of that country.
But, in many ways, the Russian invasion of Ukraine was the end point of the much longer story - the propaganda campaign designed to convince Americans to take sides in this conflict, a conflict that has nothing, strictly speaking, to do with them or with America. That effort began many years earlier - July 22nd, 2016.
That’s the day that Wikileaks published thousands of emails from the servers of the Democratic National Committee in Washington.
Those emails prove that party officials have rigged the democratic process, the primary process, in favor of Hillary Clinton, and against the insurgent populist candidate that year, Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
Within days, the chair of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, resigned in disgrace.
The Wikileaks scandal broke on the same day that Hillary Clinton chose her running mate, Senator Tim Kaine, and it overshadowed the nominating convention that followed.
But more significantly, the Wikileaks scandal threatened to split the Democratic Party into pieces.
More than 13 million Bernie Sanders voters, many of the young people, learned that the process they had always believed in was, in fact, a sham.
They had been cheated.
Democratic leaders had to act quickly in the face of this to deflect blame from themselves on to someone else.
The DNC’s servers, they claimed, had been hacked by the Russian military. The goal is to hurt Hillary Clinton, whom the Russians feared for her strength and wisdom, and to help Donald Trump, whom they controlled.
Russia hacked the servers in order to hack the election. That was their story.
The Washington Post ran with it the first day as if it were true.
But there was never any evidence that was true.
Almost seven years later, there still no evidence. The DNC story about its servers is a lie.
But as a political strategy, that lie worked flawlessly. Russia made the perfect villain.
It was a white Christian country with a traditional social structure.
It was everything the Democratic Party already opposed.
The foreign policy apparatus in Washington was happy to hate Russia again after 40 years of cold war. Hating Russia was muscle-memory, so they signed on to the Russia collusion hoax.
It had the twin benefits of paralyzing the Trump administration, which it did, and justifying the expansion of the national security state.
As the years passed and the rhetoric intensified, hysteria set in.
After a while, anybody with a heterodox opinion, from right-wingers to avowed socialists, could be accused of working secretly with Vladimir Putin.
Many were accused and some were destroyed by it.
It was a textbook witch hunt - far more effective than McCarthyism.
Unlike McCarthyism, it never ended.
Russia remained America’s greatest enemy, even as China emerged as America’s greatest threat.
Over time, the lie the Democrats told to hide their crimes in the 2016 primaries came to dominate America’s former foreign policy, then to imperil America itself.
For generations, statesmen and diplomats worked to prevent other great powers from aligning as a block against the u.S.
The idea was pretty straightforward.
You might be able to beat one strong country, but if a couple strong countries ever got together, we would lose.
This is why Richard Nixon went to China, to make sure the Chinese government didn’t align with Brezhnev, with the Russians.
Donald Trump understood this very clearly.
Russia will never be our closest ally, he said, but if Russia ever becomes China’s ally, we are in deep trouble.
The combination of natural resources, military and economic power, and sheer population would make the Russia-Chinese alliance the most powerful force in the world.
The United States would soon be dethroned - we would be taking orders.
As Trump put it, there’s no reason to make Russia our enemy, and there are many reasons not to.
It was a sound case, but official Washington ignored it.
Their response, shouted in unison: "Shut up, Putin stooge!", and then they set about trying to provoke a war with Russia.
Now they have succeeded.
But the war we are fighting in Ukraine is not against Russia alone, but also against Russia’s newest ally, the People’s Republic of China.
What Donald Trump predicted has happened, and in the worst way.
If the war in Ukraine continues, we will lose, no matter how it ends.
The world order is being reshuffled as we watch, and by the time it’s over, the U.S. will no longer be at the top of the deck.
That’s very obvious to the rest of the world, but what’s fascinating is how few Americans seem to understand what’s happening, or its consequences.
But how would they know?
No one in American politics or Media will tell them the truth.
Since the first hours after the invasion, Americans have been fed a steady diet of increasingly absurd lies about the Ukraine.
Google and Facebook have joined with the Biden administration to censor any factual information that contradicts the official story line.
It is dystopian.
Joe Biden’s first remarks about the war gave no hint that we would be sending advanced weapons systems, and American military advisors, to Ukraine.
Then, supporting the entire Ukrainian government and its pension system, with hundreds of billions of u.S. tax dollars.
No.
Joe Biden mentioned only sanctions, which were free.
Sanctions, he suggested, would be enough.
Here is Joe Biden a year ago today:
>> The Russian military has begun a brutal assault on the people of Ukraine, without provocation, without justification, without necessity.
This aggression cannot go unanswered.
If it did, the consequences for America would be much worse.
America stands up to bullies.
We stand up for freedom.
Putin is the aggressor.
Putin chose this war.
And now he and his country will bear the consequences.
Today, I am authorizing additional strong sanctions.
>> Tucker: "strong sanctions." - that’ll do it.
The goal at that point a year ago today, and you may remember this, was to push Russian forces back into their own country, to reverse the invasion.
And that seemed reasonable to most people.
It did not seem like the beginning of a Third World War.
Oh, but it was exactly that.
And by December, Lindsey Graham was confident enough to say so out loud.
Here he is: >> How does this war end?
When Russia breaks and they take Putin out.
Anything short of that, the war is going to continue.
You ask the Ukrainians to give Russia part of their country after all this death and destruction - it's not going to happen.
To signal a cease-fire, Russia will take the opportunity to rearm and come at them again.
So we are in it to win it, and the only way you’re going to win it is to break the Russian military and have somebody in Russia take Putin out.
>> Tucker: so we’re going to, says Lindsey Graham confidently, continue pouring billions into Ukraine until they "take Putin out."
Does Putin know this?
Well, we have no idea.
We are not allowed to see Russian media in this country.
That’s too much information for Americans to handle.
But if Putin does know that we plan to kill him, wouldn’t he fight back with nuclear weapons?
Why wouldn’t he fight back with nuclear weapons?
No one in the United States seems to be allowed to wonder that, much less have a conversation about it out loud.
Instead we are treated to more lectures about democracy.
Ukraine is a democracy, we are told, that’s why we are on the side of Ukraine.
The problem is, that’s a lie.
Ukraine is not a democracy. Ukraine is a corrupt one-party state.
Ukraine has none of the freedoms that define democratic governance: freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion.
Ukraine is the least free place in all of Europe, and probably for that reason it is Joe Biden’s favorite place.
For those who understand what is actually happening and what Ukraine is actually like, it’s very frustrating to watch Biden say this again and again.
It is galling to be lectured about democracy by a man who took power in an election so sketchy that many Americans don’t believe it was even real.
Joe Biden has never had the majority of American support for a single day of the Ukraine war.
In fact, Joe Biden is far less popular in the United States then Vladimir Putin is in Russia.
That’s not an endorsement of Putin -- it’s just true.
And it says everything about Joe Biden’s tenuous legitimacy.
Democracy? Please. We are adults. Stop lying to us.
So, what happens next in this war?
According to our elderly Treasury secretary, Janet Yellen, the war in Ukraine will go on forever, and so will our support for Zelenskyy.
Yellen: >> let me make clear, the United States and the allies, our support for Ukraine will be lasting and is unconditional.
>> Tucker: unconditional support for Ukraine.
Unconditional support for a nation most Americans know nothing about, and couldn’t find on the map.
Unconditional support. That’s a profound statement.
Outside of your immediate family, how many people would you pledge unconditional support to?
How many countries would you pledge unconditional support to?
This is insane, when you think about it.
But the people in charge of this disaster aren’t thinking the way that most Americans do.
The Atlantic magazine commemorated the anniversary of the war by commissioning a piece today by Tom Nichols.
He’s a silly foreign establishment parasite who has been taken seriously by other ne’er-do-wells and dumb people in washington.
But the piece is fascinating.
In it, he inadvertently reveals the point of this war in the clearest possible terms.
"Now we are faced with the long grind of defeating Moscow’s armies and eventually rebuilding a better world."
Oh. Defeating Moscow’s armies and building a better world? Perfect.
Thank you, Tom Nichols. Adding those items to this week’s to-do list.
Unspecified in the piece is how we plan to do this, to defeat Russia and its ally, China, and build a utopia. The piece is notably light on details.
Now, you'd feel better hearing about this if Tom Nichols and others like him in Washington had a track record suggesting they could do any of this - a track record of competence and success.
They don’t.
Nichols himself seems to spend most of his life arguing with other people on Twitter. He’s never achieved anything at all that we are aware of.
But then, virtually none of them have achieved anything.
Biden’s chief Ukraine strategist, Victoria Nuland, you would not hire to plan spring break.
She couldn’t do it. She doesn’t have the skills.
Now, these very same people, these demonstrably incompetent people, say they plan to rebuild a better world.
All right. That seems ambitious.
How about starting with Baltimore?
Before moving on to total global transformation, shouldn’t we fix the biggest city in Maryland first?
Under the leadership of people like Tom Nichols and Victoria Nuland, neoliberal geniuses with grand plans, Baltimore has devolved into third world chaos.
But then, so has Iraq, so has Libya, so has every other place these people have decided to "rebuild".
It should spare a moment of silence and self-reflection in the U.S. State Department that the moment Western diplomats and NGOs left the country, Afghanistan got safer.
There are far fewer killings in Kabul now than there were 18 months ago.
Pedestrians in Kabul can walk to dinner at night without being murdered.
That doesn’t tell the whole story of Afghanistan, of course, but we shouldn’t ignore that fact. It means something.
If you spend billions trying to make a place better and it gets worse, you have an obligation to think about why. Maybe you’re doing it wrong.
Maybe you are not as powerful and clever as you thought you were. Maybe there is a problem with your formula.
But none of this ever occurs to people like Tom Nichols and Victoria Nuland, and, for that matter, Joe Biden.
The more discredited they are, the more self-confident they become. They see every failure is evidence of their talents that are more desperately needed than ever.
What is this? Well, it’s called hubris.
Hubris is the delusion that causes people to mistake themselves for God.
They imagine they have power and wisdom and foresight they don’t actually possess, that no human does.
Hubris is a species of mental illness.
These people are unwell. They're crazy. And there’s nothing more dangerous than that.
Hubris has caused more suffering than polio. It's caused more death than smallpox.
And apparently, we're in the middle of another epidemic of it.
Empty barrels make the most noise.
Bkmrk
After watching this, it reminds me of Lin Wood talking about the election fraud - when he said 9/11 was CGI. Putin is not a passive actor, he is the leader of Russia. He has his own goals independent of US politics. He did not invade for reasons that fit conveniently into American dualistic politics. Tucker’s narrative is a political motivated string of disconnected half truths to create a fraudulent whole. Who are Tucker’s writers now, the LaRouche organization?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.