Posted on 06/15/2023 9:24:44 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Will Barr go on Mark Levin’s show to debate this or will he just continue to appear with the likes of Bret Baier and CNN?
Bill, you seem scared. More than usual.
Polling numbers in?
this clown needs to quit claiming to be a Republican.
I love these media-government industrial complex hit jobs. They manufacture a false narrative and then execute a media full court press to drive an emotion laden false narrative to gin up false public outrage to support their political hit job. It takes a year or so for the dust to settle enough for the public to learn just how badly they have been scammed and defrauded. Unfortunately, by then it’s far too late and the damage has been done. Can anyone answer- even if all of this is true(which it is not) , what damage was done to national security? The answer of course, is absolutely no damage at all. it’s all just false manufactured process crimes
“ARTICLE I SECTION 2....The President...may require the opinion, in writing,of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices”
Why might that have been put into the Constitution?
Would it not follow that a President might need and wish to retain at least some of those writings after leaving office?
He needs a barbed wire enema
I think that comes across as one of the most clearly stated rhetorical questions I have heard in a very long time.
Just please give my party back to my Bush capos for whom I am a bootlicking soldier. Do I have to dump a horses’ head in your bed for you to stop thinking you run things around here.
All I hear is blanket eye-rolling, and suggestions Trump should have returned the documents.
BULL! That's what got him into trouble in the first place was returning documents, several marked classified, which DOJ used as evidence to rationalize the raid!
You cannot obstruct if there is no underlying crime. The Presidential Records Act is not a criminal statute and the Espionage Act does not cover the President or ex President…….how do I know this, because from 1917 to the passage of the PRA in 1978, no ex President has ever been charged under the Espionage Act even though they had National Defense Information in their possession.
.
His Delaware US Atty has engaged in Obstruction and Conspiracy - and still is -by design.
This is that Pious outrage, but ask about Biden or Hillary - and the entire tone changes like you asked him where he was when his wife was murdered.
.
This is a big reason why Trump’s poll numbers go UP every time he’s indicted.
Baier thru Levin under the bus and let that fata*s Barr run over him and Baier never said boo.
It is VERY disappointing to see Barr being willfully blind about the partisan justice system. Shameful.
I watched a Rachel Maddow clip on one of our people’s shows where she sneered and used “felony, felony, felony” and “indictment, indictment” and “criminal, criminal,” with her ugly face in full snark and snarl.
This Barr guy is a bad one. Same words as wretched Rachel.
Levin needs to issue him a public invite.
Who needs a trial when a “distinguished” former AG proclaims the guilt of Donald Trump in the latest witch hunt? Evidently Barr is in full possession of all of the facts of the case, so a presumption of guilt is warranted.
Obstruction in liberal speaks is defending yourself.
Someone got to Barr. Wonder what they have on him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.