No thanks.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: ChicagoConservative27
I would think he would worry more about hunting rifles and 6.5 Carcanos and cheap 22 revolvers in the hands of US intelligence assets. But what do I know?
64 posted on
06/29/2023 9:19:21 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
To: ChicagoConservative27
How does this surprise anyone?
66 posted on
06/29/2023 9:23:37 AM PDT by
larrytown
(A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do. Then they graduate...)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Let’s see if people around here still have a tingling in their leg for him now.
To: ChicagoConservative27
That is a lot of very big "IF"s in that statement. Something for everybody. The statement means nothing other than deployment of smoke to conceal a position.
I won't be voting for RFK, so I don't really care what he promises to do (or not do) about "Assault Weapons".
And the Democrats will never permit RFK to be nominated in any case.
69 posted on
06/29/2023 9:26:37 AM PDT by
flamberge
(It turns out that you can fool most of the people, most of the time.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
72 posted on
06/29/2023 9:29:11 AM PDT by
Manic_Episode
(A government of the government, by the government, for the government)
To: ChicagoConservative27
“If we can get a consensus on it, if Republicans and Democrats agreed and it passed Congress, I would sign it.”
And it would still be unconstitutional.
74 posted on
06/29/2023 9:35:41 AM PDT by
MileHi
((Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
So will every single nominee that would win the primary for the Dems. Junior is just stating facts we all know logically anyways.
Biden would actually have a spring in his step if he was going to sign one if it hit his desk today, so would Hillary, Obama, any of them we’ve seen in the last 12 years.
75 posted on
06/29/2023 9:36:02 AM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: ChicagoConservative27
“If we can get a consensus on it, if Republicans and Democrats agreed and it passed Congress, I would sign it. [it would still be unconstitutional]”
77 posted on
06/29/2023 9:39:52 AM PDT by
libertylover
(Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
I still like him, EVERY Democrat in the Oval would sign it. 60% of Republicans would, if not higher. GW Boosh signed CFR which is Campaign Finance Reform, which gave us our current system of POWER TO THE POWERFUL. The idiot actually said, he signed it and hoped the USSC would overturn it. WORST Republican President ever.
79 posted on
06/29/2023 9:59:44 AM PDT by
Glad2bnuts
(“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: We should have set up ambushes...paraphrased)
To: ChicagoConservative27
He’s a trial lawyer. Hard pass.
80 posted on
06/29/2023 10:00:02 AM PDT by
cquiggy
To: ChicagoConservative27
One, I doubt he said anything of the sort.
Two, so what?
If both houses agree on something, a Pres has to be hard core to say no.
Finally, “assault weapon” in the pea-sized minds of the gun control Aholes = AR15. The most popular rifle ever. SCOTUS has already ruled that a gun in common use cannot be banned. It would be overturned in the first case to get to them.
Signing off on something you know is illegal is sketchy. Negative points for that. But, knowing it will mean nothing is very...........political.
We already had an assault weapon ban in place for ten years and it was allowed to lapse as it was shown by the US Gov’mt to have no effect. Doing it again is like revisiting prohibition.
82 posted on
06/29/2023 10:33:06 AM PDT by
bobbo666
(Baizuo)
To: ChicagoConservative27
This ought to put to bed any conservative enthusiasm for kennedy, except as a possible drain on biden “voters,” although DNC printers are probably already producing hundreds of millions of brandon “ballots”.
83 posted on
06/29/2023 10:33:53 AM PDT by
DPMD
(ua)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Ouch! Was beginning to like him. To be honest, W said the same damn thing.
89 posted on
06/29/2023 12:47:51 PM PDT by
stevio
(Fight until you die.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
A rat is a rat is a rat is a rat.
Some rats can seem slightly better than others, but in the end, they are still a Rat.
These rats love killing babies and disarming citizens and restricting our rights. Piss on all of them.
90 posted on
06/29/2023 1:27:28 PM PDT by
vpintheak
(Live free, or die!)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Can someone define an assault weapon for me?
To: ChicagoConservative27
Of course he would. Hes a died in the wool libtard progressive. His only redeeming feature is vaccines.
93 posted on
06/29/2023 1:53:47 PM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Anti-constitutional tyrant.
96 posted on
06/29/2023 2:48:22 PM PDT by
gitmo
(If your theology doesn’t become your biography, what good is it?)
To: ChicagoConservative27
I do not believe I shall vote for him.
(was not going to any way but now I shall take extra pleasure in not voting for him)
101 posted on
06/29/2023 6:56:54 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Follow the money. Even if it leads you to someplace horrible it will still lead you to the truth.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson