[ChicagoConservative27]

No thanks.

[DesertRhino]

I would think he would worry more about hunting rifles and 6.5 Carcanos and cheap 22 revolvers in the hands of US intelligence assets. But what do I know?

[larrytown]

How does this surprise anyone?

[Boogieman]

Let’s see if people around here still have a tingling in their leg for him now.

[flamberge]

That is a lot of very big "IF"s in that statement. Something for everybody. The statement means nothing other than deployment of smoke to conceal a position.

I won't be voting for RFK, so I don't really care what he promises to do (or not do) about "Assault Weapons".

And the Democrats will never permit RFK to be nominated in any case.

[Manic_Episode]

That’s just unamerican.

[MileHi]

“If we can get a consensus on it, if Republicans and Democrats agreed and it passed Congress, I would sign it.”

And it would still be unconstitutional.

[Abathar]

So will every single nominee that would win the primary for the Dems. Junior is just stating facts we all know logically anyways.

Biden would actually have a spring in his step if he was going to sign one if it hit his desk today, so would Hillary, Obama, any of them we’ve seen in the last 12 years.

[libertylover]

“If we can get a consensus on it, if Republicans and Democrats agreed and it passed Congress, I would sign it. [it would still be unconstitutional]”

[Glad2bnuts]

I still like him, EVERY Democrat in the Oval would sign it. 60% of Republicans would, if not higher. GW Boosh signed CFR which is Campaign Finance Reform, which gave us our current system of POWER TO THE POWERFUL. The idiot actually said, he signed it and hoped the USSC would overturn it. WORST Republican President ever.

[cquiggy]

He’s a trial lawyer. Hard pass.

[bobbo666]

One, I doubt he said anything of the sort.

Two, so what?

If both houses agree on something, a Pres has to be hard core to say no.

Finally, “assault weapon” in the pea-sized minds of the gun control Aholes = AR15. The most popular rifle ever. SCOTUS has already ruled that a gun in common use cannot be banned. It would be overturned in the first case to get to them.

Signing off on something you know is illegal is sketchy. Negative points for that. But, knowing it will mean nothing is very...........political.

We already had an assault weapon ban in place for ten years and it was allowed to lapse as it was shown by the US Gov’mt to have no effect. Doing it again is like revisiting prohibition.

[DPMD]

This ought to put to bed any conservative enthusiasm for kennedy, except as a possible drain on biden “voters,” although DNC printers are probably already producing hundreds of millions of brandon “ballots”.

[stevio]

Ouch! Was beginning to like him. To be honest, W said the same damn thing.

[vpintheak]

A rat is a rat is a rat is a rat.
Some rats can seem slightly better than others, but in the end, they are still a Rat.
These rats love killing babies and disarming citizens and restricting our rights. Piss on all of them.

[CodeJockey]

Can someone define an assault weapon for me?

[Georgia Girl 2]

Of course he would. Hes a died in the wool libtard progressive. His only redeeming feature is vaccines.

[gitmo]

Anti-constitutional tyrant.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

I do not believe I shall vote for him.

(was not going to any way but now I shall take extra pleasure in not voting for him)