[cuz1961]

including accusations of canceling showings, sabotaging sound systems, and even screwing with the A/C in its theaters, in order to make viewing the movie an uncomfortable experience, as part of a narrative that someone was trying to “stop” people from seeing the film.

/\

Not accusations

Multiple 1st hand reports

Narrative is what this urinalist is pushing.

So much projection (forgive the pun) in this urinalist narrative.

[mewzilla]

Hughes, if you have to ask...

[AirForceVet1988]

Could be the numbers are fake, too, because this:

https://www.dailydot.com/debug/sound-of-freedom-amc-ticket-sales/

Will we ever know the truth ?

[arthurus]

Some people are obviously, shall we say, “uncomfortable” re the success of the movie. How the hell can a movie make so much money being so counter The Narrative?

[FrankRizzo890]

How did it make $100 million? The obvious answer, not enough bomb threats against the theaters showing it!

/s

[cuz1961]

[CFW]

“’Sound Of Freedom’ Shatters Expectations, Hits $100 Million Milestone At Box Office”

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/sound-freedom-shatters-expectations-hits-100-million-milestone-box-office

“Despite the mounting hit pieces from Bloomberg, Rolling Stone, and other corporate media outlets about Jim Caviezel’s anti-child-trafficking film “Sound of Freedom,” Americans are still flocking to movie theaters nationwide as it appears the film has become one of the summer’s biggest blockbusters so far.

The low-budgeted, faith-inspired film is based on the life of Tim Ballard, the founder of Operation Underground Railroad – an organization committed to rescuing children from sex trafficking – achieved a significant milestone on Wednesday, taking in more than $100 million from US theaters since its July 4 debut.

Last weekend, Sound of Freedom finished second place behind Paramount Pictures’ new Mission: Impossible while outpacing Disney’s latest Indiana Jones.”

* * *

“’Sound of Freedom’ has become the people’s movie,” said Jared Geesey, SVP of global distribution at Angel Studios. “

[cpdiii]

The movie is not political in the sense of left and right. It shows the horror of child abuse sexual and virtual slavery. I can not understand why anyone can criticize this movie unless they are in favor of child sexual abuse and child slavery.

The far left are very sick people. Their criticism of the movie is in effect endorsing this horrible deed against children. They are part of the problem.

[Billthedrill]

Amazing how quickly this review and so many others immediately devolve into a discussion of stuff the lead actor has said outside the context of the movie. Is that all they've got? How many of them have said, "Yeah, Tom Cruise is a Scientologist so don't go see Top Gun"? Anyone?

They want to evade talking about the subject of the movie. That's actually a little strange, isn't it?