We've had discussions about his behavior before - but he always ends up back-sliding. 
Posted on 08/17/2023 10:22:31 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
BullSchiff !
Truth is an absolute defense.
but I’ll grant that in our TOTALLY corrupt “justice” system, it would not necessarily make a diff.
-fJRoberts-
It appears to me that free republic is far more influential than we might have thought. There posts under various names who immediately post something negative about President Trump. Their post names r different but their word patterns r the same. We r on woke’s radar and they live to hate. Jim has a great mission w FR and I’m a fan.
Those rules don't apply to a kangaroo court and a political which hunt trial.
Notice how the AP used quotation marks around the word “evidence.”
No bias there. /sarcasm
He should drop out. The country doesn’t deserve him. We’ll try again with trump. Maybe a better outlook. Hopefully this is his last time.
Re: 66 - ah yes, the “bankrupt US corporation” and accompanying claims.
Fury, I see you are a skeptic, since you left the following response: Re: 66 - ah yes, the “bankrupt US corporation” and accompanying claims.
So is it safe to assume you are a never-Trump person or just a person that believes it was an honest & fair election? Interesting that you responded almost immediately, as if you are personally tracking me with some kind of device that alerts you whenever I post.
According to Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes, we don't have to wait long to find out if it's real or not Fury, if in fact she has a some what accurate timeline.
And this:
Interesting that you responded almost immediately, as if you are personally tracking me with some kind of device that alerts you whenever I post.
Yes, responding to your post over five minutes after you posted is “almost immediately”.
We’ll see about the timeline Halper-Hayes discussed. You know, the lady who claims she is affiliated with a DOD advisory task force but can’t name the name of the task force.
Yes five minutes after I posted it is a rather quick response. You had to watch is first, which was actually 10 minutes 14 seconds long. The point you raised was at the very end.
The post wasn't to you, and the post was done to a thread that was posted on the day before: Posted on 8/18/2023, 12:22:31 AM. I was just remarking on the facts, which seem rather odd, and remain so, to me.
So your 5 minute defense is at best, hollow nonsense. But still interesting that you posted your response within a5 minute time frame.
Perhaps she is not obliged to reveal that at this time. The government keeps a lot of secrets from the people. Over 50 years now on the assassination of JFK & counting.
But without any facts to support your belief, you discount her assertion . You may be right you may be wrong, but the reality is you can't prove or disprove her claim. I guess your crystal ball is failing you on that "conspiracy". Can you prove that the corporation claim is an unfounded conspiracy theory that has no basis in realty?
You’re late to the game, RD. I saw the video last week when another FReeper mentioned it.
Don’t know what to say about JFK. My “guess” is that what’s not yet released is embarrassing to the CIA, or FBI, or one of several countries as almost all the individuals involved are no longer alive.
“… You may be right you may be wrong, but the reality is you can’t prove or disprove her claim.”
And isn’t that the beauty of a conspiracy theory.
I might have even agreed with you before Covid. It was all surreal, but nasty facts kept getting in the way of the lies presented, and the people proved not to be as stupid as they thought we were.
Because I can't prove it, means that I can state with certainty if it's real or false. . when you hear something though that you know is false, then you can start to discern that lies are being told about this topic. The natural reaction by anyone who knows that falsehoods are being spread is to start questioning what else are they telling us is false.
My point is, that you can't disclaim anything she has said, so what makes you so sure that she is not speaking the truth, and that you just haven't seen the proof, yet. Sounds to me like an unfounded conclusion, with nothing to substantiate that conclusion. I myself do not know what the truth is, but I am not going to dismiss it either. I will keep searching for what the truth really is, and pray that I find it. But evidence keeps mounting that evil is taking over the world. In the end good will win out over evil, because I believe in the power of the Lord. Anyone who doubts that, is not paying attention, because the evidence of that is all around us. Yet there are still those who cast doubt & disparage upon that claim.
We've had discussions about his behavior before - but he always ends up back-sliding.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.