Naysayers call the term a form of “neocolonialism,” or a way for non-Hispanic progressives to control what Latin people call themselves — in other words, a “white people thing.”
Do you think
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: artichokegrower
That is nearly the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard.
31 posted on
09/02/2023 8:11:14 PM PDT by
HIDEK6
(God bless Donald Trump. )
To: artichokegrower
As I recall, Spain determines the grammar of the language and they officially rejected the term. For the same reasons as others have said, it’s a germanic rule in a Latin language. It doesn’t make sense.
34 posted on
09/02/2023 8:43:08 PM PDT by
Marko413
To: artichokegrower
Most Hispanics aren’t spanish. They have absconded the cultures of central, south america and the carribean.
To: artichokegrower
White progressives think they know whats best for their Brown,Black, Yellow and Red brothers and sisters.
Latinos are proud of their language. This Latino says **** off Neo-Marxists ***holes.
To: artichokegrower
Because it is a term for woke, rich, virtue signaling liberal whites - not something the Latino community had anything to do with.
To: artichokegrower
And it rhyes too closely with “stinks.”
41 posted on
09/02/2023 10:03:55 PM PDT by
arthurus
(* covfefe *tu)
To: artichokegrower
Per the headline; BECAUSE IT’S A STUPID MADE UP WORD THAT IS MEANINGLESS!
42 posted on
09/02/2023 11:38:47 PM PDT by
5th MEB
To: artichokegrower
National Hispanic Heritage Month officially kicks off Sept. 15 The Hispanic celebratory month starts on the 15th? Talk about embracing the manana spirit.
43 posted on
09/03/2023 1:31:07 AM PDT by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: artichokegrower
No sh!t, Sherlock.
44 posted on
09/03/2023 3:35:50 AM PDT by
Eleutheria5
(Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
To: artichokegrower
It’s not a White person thing. It’s simply that the term homogenizes them. It doesn’t allow for any tribal pride. So no Cubanos, no Puertos, no Chicanos, just Latinx. Brought to you by idiot commies of these ethnicity groups taught communism in school by the liberal white woman.
45 posted on
09/03/2023 4:42:15 AM PDT by
Bjorn218
To: artichokegrower
Some (white) people were well funded for thinking it up, and ever since then, more of them have been well funded for promoting it.
I’ve estimated that my former college professors, white liberal feminists, have made hundreds of thousands of dollars over their careers just teaching mostly other white people white-created ideas on race. Then about the same on class issues. And most of what’s taught is never shared with people at large, including the low-income and black and Hispanic people that it’s primarily about. “Trade secrets” and all.
48 posted on
09/03/2023 12:08:01 PM PDT by
Faith Presses On
(Willing to die for Christ, if it's His will--politics should prepare people for the Gospel)
To: artichokegrower
It doesn’t help that “Latinx” sounds like a laxative.
Otherwise, a few are using the -e suffix as neutral. But again, “Latine” sounds much like Latrine, which resurfaces the scatological connection.
50 posted on
09/03/2023 3:43:40 PM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("All he had was a handgun. Why did you think that was a threat?" --Rittenhouse Prosecutor)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson