Posted on 09/02/2023 9:56:32 PM PDT by RandFan
Act Blue was all in for Fani Willis, even paying for campaign ads.
James O’Keefe uncovered fraud by ActBlue
<><>found that median-income type Democrats had donated nominal amts to ActBlue
<><>but ActBlue records falsely showed they had donated hundreds of thousands.
The donors were shocked and confused when interviewers asked
them if the 100’s of 1000’s were the amts they had donated.
The ActBlue scam was an elaborate money laundering operation
<><>they falsified financial records submitted to the FEC
<><> falsely declaring they had received big buck donations
<><>then illegally breaking them down into small donations
<><>falsely attributing those donations to fictitious names.
Yes that is annoying but an interesting report nonetheless.
Bumping this for morning crew
Thank you Liz
Fani T. Willis is the first elected woman DA for the Atlanta Judicial Circuit, the largest circuit in the State of Georgia.
Choose an amount: Your contribution will benefit Fani Willis.
$50 $101 $250 $500 $1,000 $2,500 $3,000 $
Make it monthly! Yes, count me in! No, donate once Checkout
Have an ActBlue Express account? Sign in to give faster.
Pay with card
Contribution rules I am a U.S. citizen or lawfully admitted permanent resident (i.e., green card holder). This contribution complies with the provisions of the Ethics in Government Act, O.C.G.A. Sec 21-5-30, et seq. I am at least eighteen years old.
This contribution is made from my own funds, and funds are not being provided to me by another person or entity for the purpose of making this contribution.
By proceeding with this transaction, you agree to ActBlue's terms & conditions.
=================================================
Paid for by ActBlue (actblue.com) and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Contributions or gifts to ActBlue are not deductible as charitable contributions for Federal income tax purposes.
y/v/w
Fani Willis withheld exculpatory evidence
Evidence Exonerating Trump’s Alternate Electors
In her Aug. 14 laughable indictment of Trump, Fani Willis alleged
<><>the existence of Republican electors for Trump constituted an unlawful “conspiracy” to overturn 2020 election results.
<><>Willis falsely claimed these alternate electors “unlawfully falsely held themselves out” as Georgia’s “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.
<><>She further insisted these electors intentionally attempted to “mislead.”
However, among the documents Willis has in her possession obtained during her years-long investigation of Republicans was a meeting transcript refuting her allegations which she willfully withheld.
<><>A transcript of the Georgia Republican electors’ Dec. 14, 2020, meeting, obtained by The Federalist, explicitly shows the intent
<><>that casting alternate electors was not to impersonate public officers, as Willis alleged, but to lawfully preserve Trump’s legal challenge to the state’s election results.
<><> documents specifically noted how the electors were acting as “Republican nominees for Presidential Elector,” not as “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.
Were you a writer for Mad Magazine back in the olden days?
Between his ActBlue and Pfizer stories, he evidently convinced some people he needed to he silenced.
I hope he is paying close attention to his personal security.
Thx.
Report....
“.......many of the campaign contributions to the Fani Willis campaign were from out of state contributors........
Many of these out of state contributors fit the profile of the ActBlue money laundering scheme ....
.......victims and participants that had been identified emanated from every single state across America.”
Georgia Sec. of State’s Testimony Blows Up Fani Willis’ Case
The Politics Brief ^ | September 1, 2023 | Nathan Baker
Posted on 9/1/2023, 4:18:15 PM by Macho MAGA Man
Former President Donald Trump did not ask Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to engage in any illegal conduct during the 2020 election, according to his testimony.
Logo Home Commentary Commentary Georgia Sec. of State’s Testimony Blows Up Fani Willis’ Case By Nathan Baker - September 1, 2023 Former President Donald Trump did not ask Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to engage in any illegal conduct during the 2020 election, according to his testimony.
The refutation of the claim that Trump asked to fraudulently “find votes” blows a gaping hole in the middle of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ racketeering case against the former president and 18 of his associates.
According to George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley, Raffensperger testified that the call, while “extraordinary,” was a “settlement negotiation” that took place during a debate over whether to pursue another recount of votes and not a demand to make up new votes.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepoliticsbrief.com ...
“We must strip her of all funding and, if appropriate, impeach Fani Willis,”
Colton Moore, vice chairman of Georgia Freedom Caucus, said in a statement.
“America is under attack,” Moore wrote on X. “I’m not going to sit back
and watch as radical left prosecutors politically TARGET their opponents.”
A probe into Willis’s prosecution of Trump could lead
to her impeachment, Breitbart reported.
Contact Congress
U.S. House of Representatives:
* Telephone: 202-225-3121
* Website: http://www.house.gov/
U.S. Senate:
* Telephone: 202-224-3121
* Website: http://www.senate.gov/
Message: Republicans control the House
<><>you must issue Willis a Subpoena
<><>and have the Capitol Police serve her
<><>bring her in for a House Committee hearing
<><>then just REMAND HER INTO CUSTODY
<><>while searching her entire Background for a Crime
<><>meanwhile moving forward proceedings to impeach her.
Online form to contact Colton Moore.
https://www.contactmypolitician.com/home/contact-us
A review of Fani Willis’ indictment against Trump reveals the woman actually reads
at third grade level w/ a zero IQ. Her ludicrous, politically motivated charges include:
<><>criminalizing free speech,
<><>listing numerous mundane “acts” she “says” further a “conspiracy” to overturn the 2020 election.
<><>criminalizing text asking for phone nos “to chat with state leaders”
<><>Trump’s conversations on election results as a “furtherance” of alleged crimes.
<><>Trump’s tweets constitute a “furtherance” of alleged crimes
<><>Trump conspiring when he asked voters to watch televised GA Legislature hearings.
Upshot: Willis would give Democrats a monopoly on election results conversations.
Reality Check
In 2017, a woman sued conservative actor, James Woods, for misidentifying her as a Nazi in an allegedly libelous tweet. The tweet included a photo not of her but of a different woman giving a Nazi salute while wearing a Donald Trump t-shirt at a campaign event.
The court ruled in favor of Woods under the “innocent construction rule.”
She appealed, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the ruling.
The “innocent construction rule” requires courts to consider a written or oral statement in context, giving the words, and their implications, their natural and obvious meaning.
If a statement may reasonably be interpreted innocently, it cannot be actionable per se. [Republic Tobacco Co. v. N. Atl. Trading Co., 381 F.3d 717, 726-727 (7th Cir. Ill. 2004)]
Fani Willis, Who Indicted Trump for Questioning Election Tweets, Questioned Election in Tweets
Front Page Magazine ^ | August 25, 2023 | Daniel Greenfield
fr Posted on 8/26/2023, 6:51:43 PM by E. Pluribus Unum
Two sets of laws. Selective prosecution means they get enforced only against political opponents.
And so the nation watched the disgraceful circus unfold in Atlanta with a pro-crime DA indicting her political opponents including former President Trump for, among other things, tweets.
Benny Johnson however documented multiple instances of Fani Willis, the DA, tweeting her skepticism of the election and calling it into question.
Like this one in which she seizes on the water leaks to raise questions about the count as Trump’s associates have been accused of doing.
at web site
Questioning elections is obviously illegal when Democrats win but an urgent defense of democracy when Republicans win. Since Fani Willis did not yet know the outcome of the election, it was ‘legal’ to question it at the time because she was worried a Republican might win, but once a Dem had won it, it became retroactively illegal to question it.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
DA Fani's tweet is known as an admission by opponent
and can be entered into evidence by Trump's defense.
Soros is PURE EVIL!
Alvin Bragg is also a beneficiary of same. Do we have a pattern here?
Ping for later...
Another stupid, biased cow placed far abover her capabilities.
People wholly without recommendation, experience, discernment, education or competence join these races with the tacit understanding that they will not/CANNOT be elected ... but they campaign anyway just to stuff their pockets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.