Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump was warned FBI could raid Mar-a-Lago, according to attorney’s voice memos
DNYUZ ^ | 09/06/2023 | Staff

Posted on 09/06/2023 11:34:28 AM PDT by thegagline

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
When you are served with a subpoena either you respond, respond with objections, or, after a meet and confer conference, file a motion for a protective order.

Lying, engaging in subterfuge, or ignoring a subpoena are not options.

1 posted on 09/06/2023 11:34:28 AM PDT by thegagline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thegagline

yup, no bias there/s


2 posted on 09/06/2023 11:36:08 AM PDT by patriot torch (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

The raid was to get the “Crossfire Hurricane” documents not the Classified the President Trump is authorized to have.


3 posted on 09/06/2023 11:36:42 AM PDT by afchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

“Lying, engaging in subterfuge, or ignoring a subpoena are not options”

Depends on whether one is a ‘Rat/GOPee or MAGA.


4 posted on 09/06/2023 11:37:37 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Lying, engaging in subterfuge, or ignoring a subpoena are not options.

And yet they seem to work for thus administration///


5 posted on 09/06/2023 11:39:14 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Is this the deep state breaking privilege again? Didn’t even bother reading the article


6 posted on 09/06/2023 11:40:06 AM PDT by wiseprince (Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince
Is this the deep state breaking privilege again? Didn’t even bother reading the article

There's no need- nothing to see here. Best to move along.
7 posted on 09/06/2023 11:41:06 AM PDT by Observator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: afchief

if we knew the3 scope of each document, we might be able to solve this.


8 posted on 09/06/2023 11:50:06 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

However, in their meeting, Trump insisted to Corcoran that he made clear to those around him that “anything that comes into the residence should be declassified,” the transcript reads.


Was this in the recordings?


9 posted on 09/06/2023 11:56:39 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

They were in negotiations, the Feds just got impatient.


10 posted on 09/06/2023 12:02:15 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Awful lot the hearsay in there.


11 posted on 09/06/2023 12:06:51 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

If they were requesting “classified” documents, there weren’t any.

Telling the court that there weren’t any would have been the truth.


12 posted on 09/06/2023 12:23:44 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Do the math. L+G+B+T+Q = 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

In his radio interview with President Trump this morning, Hugh Hewitt flat-out asked, “Did you move the boxes?”

President Trump said, kind of angrily, “I could do anything I wanted with those boxes. They’re covered by the presidential records act.”

Oh, boy.


13 posted on 09/06/2023 12:26:56 PM PDT by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

All those documents were at the White House at one time.

Maybe the unelected democrats working for NARA should’ve made sure they collected the paperwork before the move.

One thing that will never be told, is the amount of documents that Clinton, Bush, and Obama have, right now, that are similar to Trump’s.

“But that’s different.”(In a Karen voice)


14 posted on 09/06/2023 12:38:10 PM PDT by unclebankster ( Globalism is the last refuge scoundrel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afchief

+1


15 posted on 09/06/2023 12:39:52 PM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Personally, I believe when there are a lot of responses to
a subject then you'll get many varying opinions as one
person may hear things that others don't hear/remember.
The larger the group then there is potential for variances.
16 posted on 09/06/2023 12:42:04 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gloryblaze

Trump’s lawyers won’t adopt and defend Trump’s hard-minded approach to things.

They’re more interested in defending their law licenses from depredation at the hands of deep state hacks occupying the professional committees and licensing boards. Just like doctors during the plandemic.


17 posted on 09/06/2023 12:49:34 PM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
If they were requesting “classified” documents, there weren’t any.

I don't know. I tend to believe President Trump over random Internet posters, no offense intended.

He said the Iran attack plan was like, highly confidential. Then he said: Secret. This is secret information. Look, look at this. And then: See as president I could have declassified it. Now I can’t, you know, but this is still a secret.

Are you saying that President Trump was lying when he said that?
18 posted on 09/06/2023 12:59:29 PM PDT by Observator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Motion to quash is also an option.


19 posted on 09/06/2023 1:14:05 PM PDT by gopno1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Observator
Are you saying that President Trump was lying when he said that?

That statement will never be read in court. He was chatting with a reporter. He was not under oath. Most likely he was just blustering. Or he was lying to the reporter. Who cares? He knew he had every right to handle those documents in any way he pleased.

20 posted on 09/06/2023 1:21:13 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Do the math. L+G+B+T+Q = 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson