[Dr. Franklin]

So, almost three years now after the 2020 Big Steal, the WI Supreme Court finally found someone with "standing" to adjudicate what is obvious illegal conduct in an election. The only question is why decide anything now? Are the "conservative" justices on that court now afraid that their own re-election was in jeopardy from the Dem fraud machine, or will mail in fraud now permit more fake ballots than before?

[FLT-bird]

For all the Doomers.....yes, the rules in several states have been tightened up since 2020. Some fraud will certainly exist in the next election but it will be significantly harder to pull off in anywhere near the degree as that which took place in 2020. Too many people are watching and too many of the dodges they got away with due to Covid are not repeatable.

ALSO....they didn’t have to steal that many votes. The election was really close. Its easy to steal 1%. Its impossible when it gets up to 4-5%....at least impossible without making it so blindingly obvious to everyone that even people who want to deny it can’t because its too embarrassing. 40,000 ballots in 3 states would have flipped the last election. When the economy goes into recession and it becomes undeniable the Ukes have lost the war, Trump’s margin of victory is going to be much greater than that - and he already leads by 4-5% in several swing states.

[Don@VB]

I’ve read that historic rejection rates for absentee/mail in ballots has been around 5% but recent rates are now close to ZERO %. Bottom line: A vote for Alfred E. Newman signed by A.E.N gets counted (Provided there’s a D by his name)

[tomkat]

Since when is the commucrat goal of aiding & abetting election theft a ‘good intention’ ?

[catnipman]

BOTH the newest WaPo/ABC poll and this new NBC poll (both consistently slanted leftwards) show EXTREMELY bad news for the biden puppet handlers and shadow white house ...

AND it’s only going to get worse for them, much worse ...

SO, they’ll have no choice but to dump Joe, which probably means figuring out how to replace kamala before that IF they are forced to dump Joe BEFORE his term ends, but regardless, the Dems will be faced with a wide open primary whether they like it or not, which means RFKJ will have a chance to give them fits ...

[Elsie]

Liberals on the court argued in their dissent that the ruling would make it harder for people to vote.

They are ABSOLUTELY right!

So change your LAW; dipwads!!

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

More good news! (Along with corruption investigation of the newly installed Liberal on the WI SC and the possible removal of the Elections oversight chick and Possible removal of voter registration info with ERIC. )

https://nickmoseder.substack.com/p/3-major-election-integrity-updates?r=1g6q8s

[Pocketdoor]

Additionally, voters must personally deliver absentee ballots to the clerk’s office.

How do you do that if you are absent?

[Chewbarkah]

The suit related to this was filed on behalf of two Wisconsin voters. Missing from the reportage, in both the linked story or about 10 others I just looked up, is ANY hint of the remedy awarded to the plaintiffs, with whom the Wisconsin Supreme Court ageed.

1) The Wisconsin SC ruled that Wisconsin law does not allow drop boxes (except at manned Election offices);
2) In the 2020 election, the number of ballots introduced into the system via unmanned drop boxes contrary to state law GREATLY EXCEEDS the margin of victory for President/VP, and likely many other down-ticket contests.
3) Logic suggests that ballots that were not turned in per the requirements of Wisconsin law, were not lawful ballots, and the votes thereupon must not be counted.
4) Wisconsin’s Electors sent to DC to select Joe Biden were, by this ruling’s implications, not legitimate.
5) Why did the Wisc SC lack the courage to state this clearly for the record, and void the election?
6) Seems like it is time for a new lawsuit of continuation of this one, to get clarity on #5.

[Presbyterian Reporter]

CFP HAS ISSUED THIS WARNING RE THIS STORY-—

“”””Attention Conservative Media — Wisconsin ballot box story is 15 months old…”””””

https://www.wpr.org/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-absentee-ballot-drop-boxes-are-illegal-wisconsin

[cuban leaf]

Exactly how easy is it supposed to be to vote? What is the rule? 🤣

[Gay State Conservative]

I thought that the Wisconsin Supreme Court was recently flipped to Maoist.

[CatOwner]

Next comes the end-around by the leftists. I truly do not believe they will accept this decision.

[TexasFreeper2009]

then they were illegal in 2020 and Trump has been right all along in claiming the election was stolen from him!

[ModelBreaker]

‘Good Intentions Never Override the Law’

Bad intentions should not either. Sadly, progressive bad intentions usually do.

[high info voter]

Well that will pis off the DemocRATs..... how the hell they gonna get dead people to vote???

[ExTxMarine]

“Although it pays lip service to the import of the right to vote, the majority/lead opinion has the practical effect of making it more difficult to exercise it,” wrote Justice Ann Walsh Bradley.

I wonder if Justice Bradley would say something like the following when reviewing just about ANY "common sense gun law":
“Although it pays lip service to the import of the right to bear arms, the majority/lead opinion has the practical effect of making it more difficult to exercise it.”

I cannot help but think that Justice Bradley would throw up in her mouth, thinking about the statement I wrote - USING HER WORDS AND LOGIC!!

[ballplayer]

It should be hard to vote,the Right to it was paid for in Blood!