Posted on 11/28/2023 9:58:11 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
When the Demonrats impeached President Trump over and over again they did not get a conviction but the process still stopped President Trump from taking effective control of the bureaucracy and full agenda. The Republicans are deliberately refusing to take advantage of the impeachment process like the democrats. They are lying to us.
That works for me.
I'd rather he stay in place as a reminder of how bad Dem policies are.
If they replace him before the election, the new figurehead will be able to distance themselves from Biden policies.
Do you really think the MSM will cover it? They are as corrupt as Biden. I think they should continue to dig out evidence and when the have absolute proof impeach, but I don’t believe there is a single democrat senator with an ounce of honor who will vote to remove.
“Did this loser vote to impeach Trump?”
He did not, but the simple-minded are going to interpret this announcement (and already are) regarding Biden’s impeachment as “MATT ROSENDALE thinks Biden shouldn’t be impeached!!!!”
Morons.
Even so, Rosendale allowing himself to be chosen as point-man for this unsurprising revelation that the House GOP utterly lacks the balls to do anything “controversial” in an election year, was not the smartest move for his career.
Real Republicans (i.e. conservatives) have been waiting for Rosendale to enter the Montana Senate race against quite vulnerable commie Democrat Jon Tester; the GOP establishment squishes have desperately been trying to discourage Rosendale because he IS conservative, and the GOPe much prefers one of their own squishy kind to run instead.
Now it’s even more likely that Rosendale’s going to turtle, and slink away from any possibility of running for the Senate.
It is an impeachment I think they would have to cover it. They would spin the hell out if it of course. I have real doubts the GOP could offset that.
Here’s another black mark against the old geezer.
Ol’ Joe’s lolling around Nantucket billionaires again.
But he’s no ordinary Joe: A look at Lunchbucket Biden’s
$84M (est) in free vacations w/ some of America’s richest people
nypost.com, by Mary K. Jacob, Published Nov. 22, 2023
snip
Biden faces backlash for unreported vacations
These billion dollar vacation escapades paint a picture of Biden indulgence — and they haven’t escaped scrutiny. Biden has faced backlash for failing to list these stays as gifts on his financial disclosure forms, raising ethical eyebrows and drawing comparisons to the recent scrutiny of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Reports in May raised issue with three beach getaways.
These undisclosed retreats, provided by affluent and politically linked hosts, sparked allegations of circumventing transparency norms.
The criticism escalated when ethics experts like Walter Shaub and Richard Painter, with experience spanning multiple administrations, highlighted the necessity of divulging such stays.
Painter told The Post that any gratis stay, especially if the homeowner isn’t present, should be meticulously disclosed, a sentiment echoed by Shaub, the former head of the Office of Government Ethics under Obama.
snip
Many pics and elaborate details of the Biden’s multiple “vacations” at homes of billionaire Dems here:
The Senate is the conviction process, the impeachment process only requires a majority vote in the House. But with RINOs, they probably won’t be able to get that majority in the House for impeachment. Matt Rosendale is a solid man who is relaying the facts as they current stand. It also makes the point why we need to get more new House members & replace the loyal GOPe members.
Impeaching Biden is lame exercise.
Not only there is not enough votes in senate, but, if it somehow succeeds, president Harris will be ready to take over.
I, personally, prefer the old geezer to her.
Yes, using the impeachment process to uncover Biden corruption and money rising tool is OK.
But, realistically, congress should be more concern with running the country.
You know what? Who cares if the Senate won’t convict.
Give the House a chance to lay it all out there. Every bit of it. Let them see what a corrupt POS he is.
He’s done anyway and short of getting caught holding a bloody knife, he would never be convicted of anything.
Republicans talk a good game but don’t do much. Why pay people to do a job that they won’t do? Why pay a candidate or party to do virtually nothing?
I thought it was 2/3 ? when did it change ?
“I do not believe that you’re probably going to be able to get an impeachment, a removal, of President Biden,”
No kidding....TOTAL LOSER MENTALITY!!
sorry...2/3 of members present.
Article 1 Sec 3
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
NO NEED TO REMOVE HIM, BUT HE MUST BE IMPEACHED!
Who cares if it will get past the Senate.
Did this loser vote to impeach Trump?
****************
No, he didn’t vote to impeach Trump.
Rosendale is just saying they don’t have enough House Republicans who support impeaching Biden.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.