Posted on 02/23/2024 4:52:40 AM PST by Red Badger
It depends on her contract.
Exactly what I was talking about.
With AI, and it will only get more powerful, a small ‘crew’ can do the work of hundreds.
Once it gets to the point of sci-fi Star Trek level talk to the ‘computer’, tell it what you want and presto! there it is on your screen, the ‘studio’ will be just one guy.................
Now it’s on to Peter Doocy, so “decorum” and “civility” can be restored to the press briefings.
In one way it’s bad for artists and craftsmen; OTOH, as studio footprints begin to shrink, so too could their political influence.
State politicians lust after the money and prestige that Hollywood productions bring to their areas.
Keeping the operations close to home will bring help the studio bottom lines, initially. But it may cause their (former?) political allies to start ignoring their calls when favors are needed.
This could become a classic example of cutting off your nose to spite your face.
It’s all another coverup for President Retard by Fake News.
You are correct... especially if the terms of the employment contract state as such... even more so if a W2 pay check transacted.
When the left/deep-state go after someone, they don’t hold back.
Yes. Absolutely what they wanted.
I told them NO, I cannot sign that. And have never regretted it a moment.
and a deadman switch
accompanied by a letter that they are not suicidal
not connected to the internet
see Sharon Atkinson
In a perfect world, CBS management and journalists would be on the same side.
But media management have been sell-outs for years because so many media enterprises are money pits.
So whoever has the money controls the media now.
Many know that as an employee, anything you produce or investigate, such as intellectual property, belongs to your employer, and a NDA stays in effect after your departure, subject to court action if you fail to hold to your agreement. While I personally would be curious to her findings, only newly written discovered findings could be reported. Nothing, covering experiences while employed by CBS.
The reason she left Fox was because CBS gave her an amazing lucrative contract to get her off the air and under their control
As soon as she hit CBS her profile stepped way down
the horse may be outside the barn already. If the point was to root through the files to find out information, they have already had that opportunity.
It is completely inappropriate for an employer to lay off a reporter and take the very unusual step of retaining and searching the reporter’s files, inclusive of confidential source identification and information. From a First Amendment standpoint, a media corporation with a commitment to journalism calling a reporter’s research and confidential source reporting “proprietary information” is both shocking and absurd.
If this is part of her usual vocation and not unique to her current/past employer, then they both have a right to her work product
the N.O.C. list is in play
(Mission Impossible reference)
“The reason she left Fox was because CBS gave her an amazing lucrative contract to get her off the air and under their control
As soon as she hit CBS her profile stepped way down”
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
No doubt. She was probably getting too close to something, and they bought her off. Probably fooled her into thinking she would have a voice and a platform for her findings, too.
Hopefully she can find that voice and platform somewhere supportive and meaningful.
“It is completely inappropriate for an employer to lay off a reporter and take the very unusual step of retaining and searching the reporter’s files, inclusive of confidential source identification and information.”
####################
Yes it is, but we can’t expect the Cabal to play by the rules.
Hopefully she was smart enough to see this kind of thing coming and to have backups.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.