Posted on 03/20/2024 6:10:31 AM PDT by Red Badger
Court Insanity ,LOL
So an appellate court can now over-rule the Supreme Court???
My, oh my! Have we ever got things backwards under Slo-Jo’s watch!
So an appellate court can now over-rule the Supreme Court???
My, oh my! Have we ever got things backwards under Slo-Jo’s watch!
I can’t believe SCOTUS is allowing the botton tier Feral fags push them around. I always thought they were Supreme. I guess not.
The Fifth Circuit is an INFERIOR court to the Supreme Court, and therefore they CANNOT countermand them.
Isn’t Ezra one of the punkass “Let’s lynch Trump!” Feral commie punks?
Texas just be Texas and git r dun.
It didn’t overrule the SCOTUS.
There was no remand.
Truly a LIB/Leftist Clown World! Hey, Supremes!!! Aren’t you supposed to be “supreme”. Just wait for the nitwit Hawaiian judge to get involved. This is a pathetic state of affairs.
Bear in mind that there are at least 25 State Governors who are behind the State of Texas concerning the border dispute with the Fed Gov.
Sigh. I hope that this gets resolved soon. Just having this law in effect would perhaps lessen illegal immigration into Texas, knowing that arrest, not just deportation or release into society, is a distinct possibility. It might simply redirect immigration to Arizona or California. Even getting into the U.S. through Arizona or California might help Texas, though. Regardless of where you come across the board, you could still be arrested in Texas if you decide to try to live in Texas.
The law that is in question is a State Law that mirrors the US Immigration Law.
But it allows Texas to enforce it.
Remand or no remand. They sure as heck took a dump on the SCOTUS. Time to defund all Feral courts. All of them.
Hawaii also overruled the supremes. This is what their refusal to do their job has created.
The case was decided in SC 6-3, but two of the judges in the majority gave them a loophole saying they would be interested in the opinion of the lower court on it. The lower court took the bait and challenged.
The federal government has the Article I, Section 8 power of naturalization.
States lost the positive power of immigration in 1808, but still retain the power to block it IMO.
The Supreme Ct. has not ruled in favor of the Texas law.
The Supreme Ct. has not ruled against the Texas law.
The Supreme Ct. has refused to get involved in the appeals process and has refused to issue any emergency stays. This has disappointed supporters of the Texas law, it has disappointed the Biden Admin who are against the Texas law.
The imbecile press has spun this as the Supreme Ct. ruling for or against the Texas law, and the headlines have been misleading (as usual).
The case isn’t even before the Supreme Ct. yet, so everyone unlax.
You can’t negatively change the salary of a federal judge once in the bench.
That’s expressly in the Constitution. Article 9 going by memory.
"No one F_cks with a Biden".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.