Posted on 04/18/2024 2:30:38 AM PDT by RandFan
I am not sure, but I imagine Mizz Harkle won’t be returning to the UK any time soon.
So if I understand existing law in the UK correctly, if the Harkles kids were born using surrogacy, the kids would not be in the line of succession.
Rumor is that Harry is here on a “A1” visa, which is for “heads of state.”
However, since Harry left his royal duties, and no longer can use the “HRH” prefix, is he a “head of state?”
The Harkle kids would be pretty far down the line for the throne anyway.
William has spawned 3 legit kids who would be in line before a Harkle kid. We see very little of these Harkle kids and I wonder why. There has to be a reason they hide them. The other royals have their kids out in the open all the time.
Those kids are probably as “legit” as the Obama girls.
Some of the Brit YouTubers have said that Meghan was always trying to flirt with William at first because she wanted to be Queen.
Actually, I bet she was. She is like a sows ear compared to Catherine who seems comfortable in her own skin.
The other royals would probably want their kids to have a little more privacy. The British press won't let them have any. It's easier in LA where paparazzi have so many other, more important targets.
Those kids are probably as “legit” as the Obama girls.
Next stop: Crazytown.
Robert Graves, the author, when meeting Queen Elizabeth II, told her that they had something in common--they were both descended from the Prophet Muhammad. Whether or not Harry is the biological grandson of Queen Elizabeth, through his mother he is descended from King Charles II, and the connection to Muhammad probably goes back earlier than Charles II. (Apparently in the late Middle Ages a princess from a Muslim state who was a descendant of Muhammad married some European king or nobleman and Queen Elizabeth's descent comes from her.)
Unless Harry takes a DNA test to confirm that he is the son of Charles III, we can’t say for sure that he is a descendant of George III.
I doubt the British want them back.
If he works here, he has to pay taxes here on US-based income. However, if he also pays taxes to GB, then our tax treaty probably allows him to count the amount he pays there as paid to the USA. We have tax treaties with most countries.
Meghan is a US citizen IIRC and is taxed by the US on her worldwide income.
Harry could well be here on a diplomatic visa that allows the Harkles to get out of paying US income taxes.
If that’s the case, that’s likely why our Deep State is covering for the Harkles in the court case Heritage has brought.
I seriously doubt Deep State gives a damn about Harry’s drug use.
So in his case, it has nothing to do with citizenship?
Depending on the type of visa Harry was issued, and how the Harkles get paid, they might not have to pay any income taxes in the US.
That wouldn’t go over well with an American middle class that’s being taxed into extinction.
And if Harry’s cheated the UK taxman, too, and that comes out...
I doubt a UK citizenry that’s under the same threat we are will be pleased with the Harkles, either...
He’s an illegal.
Get this...
...She believes the former is more likely and says Harry could be on an A-1 diplomatic visa available to members of a royal family...
This isn't about security.
It's about tax dodging.
This isn't about security, is it...
Maybe not even taxes...
What are Deep States, plural, hiding...?
A suggestion: Check out the photo credits for the Nigeria and Lagos pics.
Then follow the money...
How much moolah are the Harkles making, likely tax free, off those pics?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Sussex online militia putting out disinformation targeting youtubers
BTW, AFP and Facebook also come in for a good raking over the coals. This vid has it all.
This is for all the folks who don't give a damn about what the Harkles are up to and should.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.