Skip to comments.
Linda Tripp: Not All Heroes Are Honored
Toogood Reports ^
| December 11, 2001
| Chuck Baldwin
Posted on 12/11/2001 9:09:49 AM PST by Starmaker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Starmaker
What was her job beside a CIA line tap specialist? lol
21
posted on
12/12/2001 2:23:48 PM PST
by
wwjdn
To: wwjdn
To: wwjdn
What does wwjdn stand for?
Who
Would
Jesus
Dam
N?
Tripp is the only character in this circus that didn't seek fame and fortune. She did what is right, by going to the prosecutor with evidence of subornation of perjury. No good deed goes unpunished does it?
To: P-Marlowe
Tripp is the only character in this circus that didn't seek fame and fortune. She did what is right, by going to the prosecutor with evidence of subornation of perjury. No good deed goes unpunished does it? You're kidding right? She is the circus, she recorded (without concent) Monica's private conversations and then went public with them. Like I said before Monica and Linda are no saints. I wouldn't trust them (or Clinton) to take out my garbage.
Without Linda Tripp there would have been no circus, so how did she stay out of it?
As for my nickname, it stand for What Would Jesus Do Now, the answer, the same as he did before.
24
posted on
12/12/2001 3:22:56 PM PST
by
wwjdn
Comment #25 Removed by Moderator
To: exit82
So did not record a conversation between Monica and herself and go public? It must have been old Bill who turned it over to the press.
26
posted on
12/12/2001 3:27:58 PM PST
by
wwjdn
Comment #27 Removed by Moderator
To: wwjdn
And your is point is what? Faced with being forced into a corner to commit perjury, she had the sense to get evidence of a conspiracy being orchestrated by the Chief Executive.
I don't get your jihad against Linda Tripp. Monica owes her present life to her, because Linda told her to save the blue dress. Without that evidence, X-42 and his henchmen were ready with the nuts and sluts offensive, until the DNA made that approach worthless.
Linda Tripp is a heroine. She told the truth. If that doesn't fit your ill conceived hatred of the woman, you have my sympathy. And you're still woefully misinformed.
28
posted on
12/12/2001 3:33:33 PM PST
by
exit82
To: Go Dub Go
Tell me again how she interjected HERSELF into this mess. This I want to hear.
29
posted on
12/12/2001 3:36:57 PM PST
by
exit82
Comment #30 Removed by Moderator
To: Go Dub Go
Was that before or after Monica asked her to lie on her behalf and on the President's behalf?
31
posted on
12/12/2001 3:45:20 PM PST
by
exit82
To: wwjdn
Only to protect herself after bernard nusbaum threatened and bad mouthed her. She was justified in taping because of the corruption of the clintons and their ilk
Conservatives have to learn to be as vicious as the slimy liberals TO the liberals. Let's play the game their way until they get the message of playing fair.
This is a war and we cannot afford to be nice to people who are not nice.
32
posted on
12/12/2001 5:37:45 PM PST
by
poet
To: poet
There are other way to protect yourself. But you bring up a good point, we need to start protecting ourselves and stop being sheep...
33
posted on
12/13/2001 3:30:00 AM PST
by
wwjdn
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: marsis
Yes, you merely regurgitate some crap off of DU and expect us to take it seriously!? Shallowness is an insufficient descriptive epithet for your behavior and beliefs. Suffice it to say, the accusation is PRECISELY what Hitlery! would want you to believe, killing two or three birds with one lying stone.
To: wwjdn
Linda had the right of ownership to a completely faithful recording or transcription of HER OWN conversations, no matter who with. As do you.
36
posted on
12/13/2001 12:45:33 PM PST
by
bvw
To: Starmaker
bump
37
posted on
12/13/2001 7:56:32 PM PST
by
GOPJ
To: bvw
Linda had the right of ownership to a completely faithful recording or transcription of HER OWN conversations, no matter who with. Granted. The issue is what did she do with those private conversations? Just because she had a right to record doesn't mean she had a right to disclose to the media mongers. She was not protecting anyone, she was seeking fame.
People also have a right to freedom of speech, where they can demean other people with hate speech, this doesn't mean they should.
38
posted on
12/14/2001 3:51:44 AM PST
by
wwjdn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson