Skip to comments.
Medieval Black Death Was Probably Not Bubonic Plague
Science Daily ^
| Posted 4/15/2002
| Penn State
Posted on 04/15/2002 11:36:11 AM PDT by Gladwin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: Gladwin
The symptoms of the Black Death included high fevers, fetid breath, coughing, vomiting of blood and foul body odor,...They all died of really, really bad hangovers.
41
posted on
04/15/2002 12:33:10 PM PDT
by
randog
To: xJones
Landspeed? Then you rule out the aid of African swallows. With that speed, one would suspect Acme roller skates. :) As we all know, African swallows are laden with coconuts.
42
posted on
04/15/2002 12:33:12 PM PDT
by
Gladwin
To: Gladwin
I am a little curious what they think could be the Black Death, if it wasn't bubonic plague. Today it would be called AIDS.
Comment #44 Removed by Moderator
To: BMCDA
Thanks for the heads up!
To: BMCDA
It is no longer socially acceptable to call this plague the "Black Death." That obsolete term has been superseded by "Great Society Death."
To: Gladwin
That's two african swallows with a coconut strung between them. Otherwise, as has been proven, the coconuts could not have reached their destination.
EBUCK
47
posted on
04/15/2002 12:45:50 PM PDT
by
EBUCK
To: jude24
Science is about examining what you "know," and finding out what you only thought you knew. No argument there--but anthropologists are not epidemiologists.
48
posted on
04/15/2002 12:55:07 PM PDT
by
scholar
To: EBUCK
It is simple then, they would use some strand of creeper.
49
posted on
04/15/2002 12:55:23 PM PDT
by
Gladwin
To: scholar
I'm not even certain anthropology is science...
50
posted on
04/15/2002 12:56:36 PM PDT
by
jude24
To: BMCDA, Gladwin
Thanks for the ping!
As far as I know, the plague has been confirmed in skeletons of the early Black Death period as well as skeletons of later suspected plague epidemics. It's beyond me how anyone would think that historical notes of clinical symptoms would trump direct DNA evidence.
51
posted on
04/15/2002 12:58:12 PM PDT
by
Nebullis
To: blam
ping
To: jude24
I'm not even certain anthropology is science... While I'm sure that anthropology has brought some important understanding of things past, they are making inferences from things long gone.
While an epidemiologist deals with empirical evidence based on currently observed disease patterns, examining the dead and dying and observing the offending disease bearing microganisms through cultures and under microscopic examintation.
53
posted on
04/15/2002 1:15:01 PM PDT
by
scholar
To: Nebullis
I remember seeing the same evidence but couldn't find any reference/proof. Can you?
I searched the CDC site and some British med-sites but came up craps.EBUCK
54
posted on
04/15/2002 1:17:42 PM PDT
by
EBUCK
To: Gladwin
Black Knight: "No creeper shall pass!!!
EBUCK
55
posted on
04/15/2002 1:29:13 PM PDT
by
EBUCK
Comment #56 Removed by Moderator
To: Black Agnes
In the case of pneumonic, the patient has bubonic and some respiratory disease simultaneously, causing the cough droplets to be infected with y. pestis as well. The deadliest and most scary form of the disease is actually septicaemic plague. Yes, and that's the key. Some of the surviving descriptions of some of the cases are consistent with diagnoses of pneumonic and septicaemic plague, so I don't know how they can rule out Y. pestis.
To: Physicist
True, and it's been shown that patients infected with septicaemic plague could have concentrations of plague in their blood stream sufficient to infect any fleas that bit them and subsequently infect others. (pardon scary english, i'm in a hurry...).
To: Gladwin
Medical diagnosis that came down from that era:
"Ring around the rosy,
Pocket full of posies
Ashes, ashes,
We all fall down".
Regards,
To: Physicist
I know what the problem is with this research. The researchers consist of a couple of graduate students and anthropology professers at Penn State, plus a few others, and the source of this article is Penn State. There isn't one medical expert of any kind named as being involved in this research. No epidemiologists or even forensic pathologists.
60
posted on
04/15/2002 2:05:53 PM PDT
by
wimpycat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson