Posted on 05/09/2002 11:21:02 AM PDT by ElRushbo
Sounds like the European model to me. =^)
5.56mm
I agree with Dog Gone -- this needs to go the SCOTUS and let them rule and then let the Washington Post and LA Times get what they have coming to them. Count me in for a donation! Hope they are forced to not only pay legal bills but damages for bringing what I consider a frivolous lawsuit against FR!
You are the best! And I am so glad you are on our side.
I smell SLAPP suit!!!Hmmm... Could be.
SLAPP = "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation"
From http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/Beder_SLAPPS.html:
"...Every year thousands of people are sued in the USA for speaking out against governments and corporations. Multi-million dollar law suits are being filed against individual citizens and groups for circulating petitions, writing to public officials, speaking at, or even just attending, public meetings, organising boycotts and engaging in peaceful demonstrations.[2] These law suits have been labelled "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation" or SLAPPs by University of Denver academics Penelope Canan and George Pring, who have been studying such suits for more than a decade with the help of funding from the US National Science Foundation......One trial judge pointed out:
The conceptual thread that binds [SLAPPs] is that they are suits without substantial merit that are brought by private interests to "stop citizens from exercising their political rights or to punish them for having done so"...The longer the litigation can be stretched out, the more litigation that can be churned, the greater the expense that is inflicted and the closer the SLAPP filer moves to success. The purpose of such gamesmanship ranges from simple retribution for past activism to discouraging future activism.[17]...
Actually, due to the selling of online newspaper archives to high school, university and public libraries, this may have crossed over into the realm of a "suit without substantial merit."
We all pay for these online archives through our tax dollars. You can access them online through a password system from your local library, or go to a local university or high school and access them there. I know that Newsbank has an "email this article option". They're not charging you to email the article, so can you email a single article all day long?
I know that I can access a number of these archives in a number of ways, and a majority of Netizens should be able to achieve similar access. (If the selling consortium attempts to control this access, they can be easily smacked down with the ADA)
The playing field may have changed. ;-)
In the meantime, the group is barred from allowing its members to post full-text articles from The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times.As an update to my PREVIOUS documentation (on 12/3/01) of this fact, once again, for the record, MANY left-wing websites have been posting (and CONTINUE to post) full-text articles from the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post - apparently with the knowledge and consent of those corporations.But the Los Angeles Slimes is A-OK with The Smirking Chimp posting full-text articles more than a year AFTER the "decision" by their pet judge. ;-)
And this practice continues, as recently as TODAY. See, for instance, an Los Angeles Times article by John Balzar called "Out of Step, but With a Big Swagger" posted online in all of its copyrighted FULL TEXT glory at:
www.Smirkingchimp.com
Post #135 FYI ping.
Any thoughts on this article, fellow pseudo-militant conservatives???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.