Skip to comments.
Expert: Body dumped after defendant fell under suspicion (SO WHO DUMPED DANIELLE VAN DAM'S BODY??)
Union Trib ^
| July 11, 2002
| Steve Perez/Greg Magnus
Posted on 07/11/2002 6:47:45 AM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,301-1,318 next last
To: Illbay
So, who killed the little girl? Are there any other likely suspects? Damon!
61
posted on
07/11/2002 8:03:36 AM PDT
by
crypt2k
To: MizSterious
On the SND there are pages for Bug Succession, Feb Weather at El Cajon (Dehesa), on the Info Page there are links to Forensic Entomology...and a lovely song under Take Away
Stealth Ninja Dave
62
posted on
07/11/2002 8:03:44 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: ItsOurTimeNow
? Tell me more of this refugee board you speak of... First you have to do something real bad and get kicked off Free Republic.
63
posted on
07/11/2002 8:04:32 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
To: shezza
If DAW were guilty, I would want him to pay with his life. But IMHO, based on all the evidence presented, I believe he is NOT GUILTY. In my opinion, he is merely a convenient patsy for the real killer. Frankly, I am surprised at all of the support that Westerfield is receiving on this forum. The evidence and his actions seem to point to his guilt. Many here even question the parents based simply on their lifestyle. Most knew OJ was guilty on even less direct evidence.
To: YaYa123; Rheo
You're asking the wrong person about mummification. I really have no idea. Rheo, any clues on this? One thing, though, I believe she was only partially mummified.
I really need those transcripts. Half-listening and missing lots altogether, I'm more baffled than enlightened by yesterday's testimony.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Diane Halfman is largely the reason.Who is she and what bearing does she have on the case?
And FWIW, how is it you think of Westerfield as the "quiet guy up the street"? Was he not involved in this whole "swinging" crowd?
66
posted on
07/11/2002 8:05:13 AM PDT
by
Illbay
To: MizSterious
Thanks for the explanation. You spell my name r-e-d-l-i-p-s-t-i-c-k, got it?
To: AmusedBystander
Have you followed the trial closely?
To: crypt2k
I'm sorry, you mean the father? Why is he a suspect, in your mind?
69
posted on
07/11/2002 8:07:35 AM PDT
by
Illbay
To: shezza
I think the thing that stands out most in my mind is the fact that he has been 100% truthful from the git-go. The 'similarity' of the fibers mean nothing in ths day and age of superstores, where it is not only possible, but likely that people in a given geographic location will have the same type of textiles in their homes. The only thing that I have seen that made me say hmmmmmmmmm, was the very small amount of blood on DW's jacket. After the defense questioning, I'd give equal creedence to either Danielle being in the motorhome without DW's knowledge, or the evidence being planted. The prosecution has presented no coherent theory of the crime, provided nothing but marginally circumstantial evidence while the defense has proven every statement made to police by DW was truthful. He cooperated fully with the investigation, and answered all police questions truthfully. I really don't see how the jury could convict him. Dusek has failed miserably at every point he said he would prove in his opening statement.
To: Illbay
Who is she and what bearing does she have on the case?She is retired SDPD and a very good "friend" of the van Dams that was surgically attached at the hip from the moment the child went missing.
Was he not involved in this whole "swinging" crowd?
NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: UCANSEE2
Now, that isn't true....
I founded the thing, and I have never even had a deleted post.
I am a model of ladylike behavior and restraint.... heeheehee
To: MizSterious
"Insects and Evidence" - to the tune of Incense and Peppermints by Strawberry Alarm Clock
Good sense, evidence, cripplin' and kind.
Dead bugs, many things I can't define.
Oh fingerprints, sweat it boggles your mind.
Insects and carpet fibers, I ask myself why.
Who cares what games they choose?
Little to win, but nothing to lose.
Insects and Dusek, meaningless nouns.
Turn on, tune in, turn your eyes around.
Look at Van Dam, look at Van Dam,
Yeah, yeah.
Look at Damon, look at Damon,
Yeah, yeah,
Yeah, yeah.
They danced at Dads until one or two.
Throw your pride to one side, It's the least you can do.
Dusek and politics, nothing is new.
A yardstick for lunatics, one point of view.
Who cares what games they choose?
Little to win, but nothing to lose.
Incest, innocence, crippled and kind.
Blone hairs and many things I can't define.
Oh evidence, PR firms it boggles your mind.
Insects and evidence, I ask myself why.
Who cares what games they choose?
Little to win, but nothing to lose.
Insects, evidence, insects, evidence.
Sha-la-la, sha-la-la....
To: Illbay
Yes, that's why I asked.Sorry, was being humorous and flippant.
I think as you read all the replies , others have provided the 'list' of other suspects.
If you aren't satisfied with that , ping me and I'll give you more names.
74
posted on
07/11/2002 8:09:38 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
To: vollmond
Well, no matter, after David is found not guilty his life will be a difucult one. His life has been ruined. There are those who will never see anything but a anti-social pedophilic child killer. That is beyond sad.
75
posted on
07/11/2002 8:10:21 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: AmusedBystander
Why don't you try basing your OPINION on some FACTS???
What FACTS are you referring to?
To: shezza
POST 8 Ditto/BUMP...
77
posted on
07/11/2002 8:10:39 AM PDT
by
FresnoDA
To: Illbay
NO.
To: ItsOurTimeNow
Bravo !!!!!!
To: ItsOurTimeNow
First you have to do something real bad and get kicked off Free RepublicSorry, forgot the (/sarcasm) tag !
80
posted on
07/11/2002 8:11:33 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,301-1,318 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson