Posted on 06/15/2003 9:18:19 PM PDT by blam
Sorry, I can't remember his dates it was so many years ago that I read his book(s).
Professor Mike Baillie in his book Exodus To Arthur does some similar work but has a lot of supporting data that was unavailable to Velikovsky. Cosmic Winter by astronomers Clube and Napier is also very good.
Baillie said that Velikovsky's big mistake was trying to hard to explain everything.
Don't know.
I wonder how Mungo Man fits into this all?
Don't know.
I wonder how Mungo Man fits into this all?
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
In suburban Maryland, just outide DC, there are lots of Mexican immigrants, and some of them look JUST LIKE the Olmec statues. The resemblance is quite striking.
The first Americans were the men who signed the Declaration of Independence.
I've been to Australia, New Guinea, and a number of the islands that make up Melanasia. As you go farther east, the inhabitants change from very dark Melanasians (aboriginals) into lighter Polynesians. However, there is no line where it is obvious, only a gradual change in form and hue. As far as culture goes, the Polynesian culture and Melanasian culture also melds from one to another. In some cases, they are identical in such things as art, canoe types, and navigation/settlement of their islands. So it correct to say that Aboriginals not only were "like" the Polynesians, but were the Polynesians.
Did you know that the Lombok Straits between Bali and Lombok (both in the country of Indonesia) separate the Indo-Malayan realm from the Austro-Malayan realm?
Yes, you are correct! That is known as Wallace's Line, named after the British naturalist who first noticed that. There was a thread on the "Hobbit" people discovered earlier this year on Celebes (Sulawesi) earlier this year.
Thanks for the ping to an old thread. One thing I find interesting about this is that migration from Australia to the Americas could plausibly take place indirectly via a northward migration towrards the Japan Current, which would result in a migratory pattern leading down the California coastline towards Latin America. Theoretically it seems direct migration via the West Wind Drift might also be possible, though I'm not sure how the logistics of that would work in terms of weather, since this route leads near Antarctic waters (but then who knows if the temperature in that region was the same then as now?).
is that because it appears that the Eqyptions had a couple of extended periods of their own "Dark Ages" where there are few records - and thus missing kings?
I've heard similar things in regards to "12".
Great tagline.
One reason for the king list problem is that even the original (by Manetho, which exists only as copies in other ancient writers) was made very late in pharaonic times.
Another reason is that the list was itself a political document.
Still another reason is that it was based on the New Kingdom inscription (found even today in a temple of Seti, which was completed by his son, Ramses / Ramesses II), which wasn't necessarily well understood by Manetho.
Still another reason is that the inscription was also a political document.
Of course, the main reason is, the Exodus didn't take place during the New Kingdom. :')
'The pre-European Fuegeans, who lived stone age-style lives until this century, show hybrid skull features which could have resulted from intermarrying between mongoloid and negroid peoples. Their rituals and traditions also bear some resemblance to the ancient rock art in Brazil.
'
iwould assume dna studies might ofer some help in this. surprised not done already.
"It just that the Aboriginees sailing to Brazil 12,000 years ago and wind up as a not so technological society, is a stretch. If the Olmecs, Aztecs, Incas, Mayans, Anasazi, etc. etc. are decendents of Aboriginal Australians, would it not make sense that Aboriginals be a little more sophisticated than their history suggest??? "
where on earth is anyone claiming the INDIAN civilizations you name are anything but Indian aka mongoloid?
LOL - For your enjoyment:
WINE EXPERT:
A lot of people in this country pooh-pooh Australian table wines. This is a pity as many fine Australian wines appeal not only to the Australian palate but also to the cognoscenti of Great Britain.
Black Stump Bordeaux is rightly praised as a peppermint flavoured Burgundy, whilst a good Sydney Syrup can rank with any of the world's best sugary wines.
Château Blue, too, has won many prizes; not least for its taste, and its lingering afterburn.
Old Smokey 1968 has been compared favourably to a Welsh claret, whilst the Australian Wino Society thoroughly recommends a 1970 Coq du Rod Laver, which, believe me, has a kick on it like a mule: 8 bottles of this and you're really finished. At the opening of the Sydney Bridge Club, they were fishing them out of the main sewers every half an hour.
Of the sparkling wines, the most famous is Perth Pink. This is a bottle with a message in, and the message is 'beware'. This is not a wine for drinking, this is a wine for laying down and avoiding.
Another good fighting wine is Melbourne Old-and-Yellow, which is particularly heavy and should be used only for hand-to-hand combat.
Quite the reverse is true of Château Chunder, which is an appellation contrôlée, specially grown for those keen on regurgitation; a fine wine which really opens up the sluices at both ends.
Real emetic fans will also go for a Hobart Muddy, and a prize winning Cuivre Reserve Château Bottled Nuit San Wogga Wogga, which has a bouquet like an aborigine's armpit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.