Posted on 07/08/2003 11:11:14 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
Did I miss anything?
Good points. Another is that since homosexuals in general, and men in particular, are wildly promiscuous, the whole idea of monagamous "marriage" is only a politcal ploy for sympathy, appealing to peoples's sense of fairness and justice and sentimentality. They want nothing to do with marriage in any sense of the word. They want to change the world into a bordello that makes them feel comfortable and normal people shoved into the closet.
Meaning that we have to hire crossdressers, can't use the word "homosexual" (as in Britain), employers having to provide benefits to "partners", kids in school learning about fisting and whatnot, "Gay Pride" parades down Main St. USA, being fired if we express the wrong viewpoint about sexuality, etc.
Because two people of the same sex have never, in the history of civilized societies, ever been able to marry. You can take your argument and use it to cover a man marrying his mother, or his father, or daughter, or two brothers, or a gang of friends, etc.
The end of the argument is that there is an absolute unchangeable standard of wrong and right, and homosexuals and their supporters don't like that and want to shove their moral relativism down our throats. I personally have had enough and am going to fight it with every ounce of my being for the rest of my life.
I've seen Dilly's posts before and he is a total 100% homosexual supporter and gets rather unpleasant about it. There is no room in conservatism for the promotion of sexually deviant behavior. Healthy dialogue about aberrant sexual behavior means telling the truth about it, not kowtowing to homonazis.
You people should read the dictionary before you use long words. A theocracy means being ruled by non-elected religious hierarchy types - mullahs, priests, etc. It does NOT mean a government whose laws are informed by traditional moral codes.
http://www.freerepublic.com/~dilly/
This account has been banned or suspended.
What they really want is for the rest of us to tell them they are okay, healthy, good, and normal despite the manifest evidence to the contrary. If they cannot persuade or deceive us into accepting that queer equivalence, they will employ the coercive power of the state to attempt to shut us up.
Correction: you don't choose to be male or female. You are born either male or female, and sexual attraction to the opposite sex is powerful congruent natural consequence of that fact.
To engage in homosexual behavior, you must choose and act to override that powerful and congruent sexuality that is the birthright of males and females.
The fact that in most gay and lesbian relationships one partner typically adopts an aggressive "male" role and the other adopts a more passive "female" role is further evidence that the male-female complementariness is strongly in-born.
In sum, you do not "choose" to be heterosexual--it is natural and congruent consequence of male-ness and female-ness. You choose to be homosexual as an unnatural and incongruent behavior set.
What I have found especially saddening (in the past, now I am starting to get righteously angry) is all the non-homosexual acting but sympathetic sheeple. Young people, old ladies (such as my late mother), people who have bought the propaganda. I talked to one young lady today at the supermarket about it. She said the usual "I don't think it's healthy or moral, but they should be allowed to do what they want in the privacy of their own homes." When I tried to prove that that isn't what they want, she got angry.
None so blind as those who don't want to see. But this message of truth has to get out - that they do not want to be left alone, they want to rule the world.
It is NATURAL to BECOME a heterosexual so that is why the majority "choose" to be that--it comes down to conditioning and what you are exposed to as a young child. It is also a learned behavior, so to say.....Most male homosexuals were molested as teenagers or boys by men who recruited them for their lifestyle (see Hitler's brownshirts and their association with the youth groups in Germany--Roehm is a good example). Childhood situations can set one up to be very susceptible to that nihilistic behavior and it can be taught to one who is young and confused and has no concept of right and wrong. You especially see boys now that have no father at home who are targets for gay men. I know a man in prison, but he only got 6 years, for molesting two brothers who had "no" father and "no" religious training.
Apparently you forgot the sarcasm tag, but just in case you didn't, you are generally comparing apples to oranges - as the old saying goes. Your response is totally irrelevant to the discussion as making a choice of WHO of the opposite sex is not the same as the choice of WHAT sex to be attracted to.
The Phag agenda is repeatedly revealed several posts over within this thread, so I won't use Jim's bandwidth just to restate it for you. The Phags know there is no pride in being "gay" or "lesbian". Period. They know there is little chance of "straights" naturally being "proud" of the queer lifestyle, gaining their "pride" only through public apathy by intimidation or through legislation.
"Faithful are the wounds of a friend; but the kisses of an enemy are deceitful."
Those who kiss up and deceitfully agree it is one's "right" to be perverted are the enemy.
if you're so sure, why not call their bluff?
They want to change the world into a bordello that makes them feel comfortable and normal people shoved into the closet.
yeah, that's what they want. they want to change the world into a bordello. if we do not stop them you will soon be forced to sell yourself and all of your family members as prostitutes or else be forced into hiding. it's all part of the "vast gay agenda."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.