Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican History Revealed

Posted on 07/23/2003 10:03:09 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 821-836 next last
To: All
This post should be retitled "Advertising on FR Revealed"
81 posted on 07/23/2003 7:49:26 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan; mac_truck
The Democrat/Conferates of the 1860s have their apologists in the neo-Confederates disguising themselves as Republicans.

Would you prefer Southerners to vote Democrat instead? That would satisfy you, but leave the liberals in charge.

See how you are detremental to the GOP? Stop wasting time on divisive strawman arguments. Neither of you support half of your assertations anyway!

82 posted on 07/23/2003 8:01:10 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
You vastly overestimate the number of southerners today who give a damn about Democrat traitors of the 1860s.
83 posted on 07/23/2003 8:10:16 PM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
In fact, 200,000 southern blacks and 100,000 southern whites fought for the United States of America while millions of northern Democrats collaborated with their rebel brethren of the Confederacy.

Wow. Maybe 300,000 Southerners sided with the yankees, while MILLIONS of Northerners sided with the Confederacy. That ought to tell you something.

84 posted on 07/23/2003 8:12:27 PM PDT by 4CJ (Dims, living proof that almost everywhere, villages are missing their idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
Republicans veneratiing Democrat-rebels of the Confederacy causes immense harm to the Grand Old Party.

NAACP bending your ear? Perhaps that's where we part company, I don't let the PC propaganda dictate my views and I'm in good company with conservative Americans.

85 posted on 07/23/2003 8:14:27 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
You vastly overestimate the number of southerners today who give a damn about Democrat traitors of the 1860s.

Explain why - or is this another baseless assertation.

86 posted on 07/23/2003 8:15:48 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Well you have to figure they're returning to their true roots, that of abe and the Whigs. Government takes care of all type attitude

Yep. And with the latest neo-recontructionist policies of military expansion/subjugation, socialism, big-government programs, tax-refunds for non-payers, gun control programs, welfare etc. being pushed by so called "republicans", they are not the Reagan/Goldwater/Gingrich/Helms Republicans of a few years ago.

87 posted on 07/23/2003 8:18:36 PM PDT by 4CJ (Dims, living proof that almost everywhere, villages are missing their idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Yes, it does tell you something. The northerners who sided with the Confederates were all Democrats, and the southerners who sided with the United States Government (the blacks and the white Unionists) voted Republican as soon as they could.
88 posted on 07/23/2003 8:33:18 PM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
... yet give credence to absurdities such as black rebel soldiers

Unfortunately for you many are documented. Pension records, service & Official Records, eyewitness accounts abound the testify to the truth. Even in the Slave Narratives there are accounts of ex-slaves professing to their service to the Confederacy. Those facts might not agree with your mythological assertions, but they are documented, and refute your inane position. You denigrate the memories of those men that fought for their country. Your village is calling.

89 posted on 07/23/2003 8:34:23 PM PDT by 4CJ (Dims, living proof that almost everywhere, villages are missing their idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Perhaps that's where we part company, I don't let the PC propaganda dictate my views and I'm in good company with conservative Americans.

Nor do I worship the Republican Party. The candidates that favour limited government and abide by the terms of the Constitution will get my vote.

90 posted on 07/23/2003 8:38:20 PM PDT by 4CJ (Dims, living proof that almost everywhere, villages are missing their idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
It (FedGov) would have stayed tiny had the Slavers not revolted.

Did you consult your crystal ball before posting that one? LOL!

91 posted on 07/23/2003 8:40:02 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
How many Southerners are in the United States armed forces today?

I believe the figure is ~40% of the total armed forces. That's significantly in excess of the % of the total population which Southerners represent.

What is truly shocking though is not necessarily Southern over-representation in the military but northern regional under-representation. The % of members of the military hailing from New England is unbelievably small.
92 posted on 07/23/2003 8:40:46 PM PDT by bourbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
The candidates that favour limited government and abide by the terms of the Constitution will get my vote

Yes indeed - those who blindly follow one-party may do so to their detriment. As John Galt pointed out earlier, parties do shift and change policy, but our commitment to soveriegn rule and governing by the Constitution must not change.

Well said!

93 posted on 07/23/2003 8:44:25 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
What it should tell you is that the positions advocated by the Radical Republicans were in the minority. Lincoln barely won re-election, and even then, only without the South voting against him, and the military preventing votes for anyone other than Lincoln. "Beast" Butler bragged about supressing the vote.
94 posted on 07/23/2003 8:46:07 PM PDT by 4CJ (Dims, living proof that almost everywhere, villages are missing their idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
The candidates that favour limited government and abide by the terms of the Constitution will get my vote.

Don't say that now!! If that's your policy you won't be voting for Republicans all the time now ;)

95 posted on 07/23/2003 8:46:20 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy
bump
96 posted on 07/23/2003 8:51:01 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
I was speaking with an Air Force pilot (from Illinois) this past weekend. He stated that the 'south' was right, and that the north was a liberal bastion that he was glad to escape from. He went on to say that Southerners were far more patriotic and supportive of the military than what he had experienced while serving in the "liberal" North.
97 posted on 07/23/2003 8:52:35 PM PDT by 4CJ (Dims, living proof that almost everywhere, villages are missing their idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Don't say that now!! If that's your policy you won't be voting for Republicans all the time now ;)

Sad, isn't it? We had a party pledged to support & defend the Constitution against all attacks, now many in that party are simply prostituting themselves for votes.

98 posted on 07/23/2003 8:56:00 PM PDT by 4CJ (Dims, living proof that almost everywhere, villages are missing their idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
partisian

Didn't even spell it correctly.

99 posted on 07/23/2003 8:56:39 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Population Representation in the Military Services.



Excerpt:
Geographic Representation. During the last 15 years, the percentage of recruits from the Northeast and North Central regions has decreased with a corresponding increase in the percentage of recruits from the South and West regions. The geographic distribution of enlisted active accessions for FY 2000 shows that the South, and in particular the South Atlantic and West South Central Divisions of this region, continued to have the greatest representation. More than two-fifths of NPS accessions hailed from the South. In fact, this was the only region to be slightly overrepresented among enlisted accessions compared to its proportion of 18-24 year-olds. The representation ratio (percentage of accessions divided by percentage of 18-24 year-olds from the region) for NPS active accessions from the South was 1.2, compared to 0.8 for the Northeast and North Central and 1.0 for the West.



A more detailed report on geographic representation in the U.S. Military.





100 posted on 07/23/2003 9:03:02 PM PDT by bourbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 821-836 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson