Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Crying He Made? (Vanity)

Posted on 12/10/2004 3:55:50 PM PST by Logophile

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: anniegetyourgun
Not sure I'd want to eat a marshmellow toasted over. . .that kind of fire.

21 posted on 12/10/2004 5:17:16 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Logophile

My baby didn't cry when he was born. He just looked around. Yes, he was/is healthy.


22 posted on 12/10/2004 5:20:40 PM PST by HungarianGypsy (We are the pirates who don't do anything....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
The Steve Miller Band song "Take the Money and Run" says 'Billy Mack is a detective down in Texas / You know he knows just exactly what the facts is / He ain’t gonna let those two escape justice / He makes his livin’ off other people’s taxes'

This has always perplexed me. But perhaps there is some point I have missed. Is it actually correct that Billy Mack knows exactly what the facts is rather than what the facts are? Is there some to pronounce "justice" such that it will remotely rhyme with either Texas, 'facts is' or taxes?

23 posted on 12/10/2004 5:22:03 PM PST by Sloth (Al Franken is a racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell

I'm still thinking of posting one with the title: Why? No text follows. It seems to me that would be the ultimate vanity. Maybe I'll do it on Christmas Eve....when no one is looking!


24 posted on 12/10/2004 5:22:41 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell; anniegetyourgun; onyx; dansangel; Fierce Allegiance

I suggest we collect them, get some matches, and have a "Bonfire of the Vanities".


25 posted on 12/10/2004 5:33:57 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Ooops. Sorry. Didn't see you previous post. A bottle of Magnificat with dinner has my guard down a bit.


26 posted on 12/10/2004 5:37:34 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Logophile

the hymn was written 1500 years after Christ was born...

However, I believe what it means is that he was an "easy" baby, not a colicy one...


27 posted on 12/10/2004 5:40:21 PM PST by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Tex-iz
Fax-iz
Just-iz
Tax-iz

I didn't check your profile ... is you not from Texas?


28 posted on 12/10/2004 5:49:18 PM PST by Tax-chick (Benedicere cor tuo! Quomodo cogis comas tuas sic videri?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: Logophile

There are also a number of Christmas songs which says the "Angels sang". Actually there are only two places in scripture where the angels sing. One is at creation and the second is at our Lord Jesus' return. They never sing at the birth of Chirst.

It doesn't matter. I still like the songs.


30 posted on 12/10/2004 10:03:17 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole

***Jesus was a perfect man. He was therefore a perfect baby.***


You put forward interesting ideas, but being that the Scripture is silent on the subject...


The fact that Jesus was the perfect man did not stop him from being angry, frustrated, disappointed, etc.

I think that the over-sanitized Jesus is more a product of man's theology (be it Catholic or Victorian Protestant) than an actual picture of the Jesus of the Scriptures.


31 posted on 12/11/2004 12:39:18 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
There are also a number of Christmas songs which says the "Angels sang". Actually there are only two places in scripture where the angels sing. One is at creation and the second is at our Lord Jesus' return. They never sing at the birth of Christ.

I thought you must be mistaken about the angels not singing at Christ's birth, so I looked it up. Here is what Luke 2:13–14 says;

"13 And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying,

"14 Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men."

So it appears you are right. I learn something new every day. Thanks.


It doesn't matter. I still like the songs.

So do I.
32 posted on 12/11/2004 6:41:09 AM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
The writer had no kids?

Quite possibly he or she didn't. However, it is clear from the rest of your post that you do!
33 posted on 12/11/2004 6:44:50 AM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
Why a newborn might not cry (from a father of 5 and grandpa of 13):
1. He was tired from all the work of being born in the normal manner.
2. His mother had wrapped Him tightly in cloth to help Him feel secure, just as is if still in the womb.
3. He was in the soft hay in the manger.
4. His mother was with him.
But, indeed, Franz Gruber wrote the song many years after the event. Perhaps he did not know what really happened. Perhaps it is beautiful poetic license.
34 posted on 12/11/2004 9:55:26 AM PST by agedav (the aviation theologian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Logophile

I'm real fuzzy, if I ever even knew something about this at all, but yes, I do believe there is a theological assertion being made.

I know that because Mary conceived without being defiled by the spiritual effects of Adam's sins (I'm wording that really carefully because from another thread it appears to me that he disagreement between Catholics and Orthodox over the Immaculate Conception is one over wording; the Orthodox believe Catholics' wording of "original sin" is misleading.) that Mary did not experience pain in giving birth. Likewise, it would make sense that the baby would experience neither the pain, nor would he experience birth as a loss.

But I'm getting way too wild, and I'm sure there's a theologically similar way of explaining it that doesn't alientate Protestants.


35 posted on 12/11/2004 9:13:34 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logophile

Dunno, but we do know the adult Jesus wept.


36 posted on 12/12/2004 12:14:24 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson