Skip to comments.
Fundamentalists (five major points of conflict with the Catholic Church)
Catholic Education ^
| Peter Kreeft
Posted on 10/25/2006 10:37:55 AM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-278 next last
To: texan75010
I grew up Catholic.You could have stopped right there and saved yourself the effort. We all woould have understuned.
21
posted on
10/25/2006 12:11:59 PM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Face it, every empire comes to an end, and ours is on the down hill slope.)
To: StJacques
So you noticed that he uses terms that are rude, insulting and dismissive. But you hope that "fundamentalists" will not feel insulted or dismissed.
The very term "fundamentalist" is used by the author to be derisive. Most of the people he is referring to would call themselves Evangelical ( the term "fundamentalist" having been co-opted to mean a stupid fool who is intransigent and unintelligent in the general parlance.( Please spare me the origin and explanation of the term, I am thoroughly acquainted with Machen). This is a Roman Catholic defense of positions that are not those held by other Christians. Great. It is articulate in its presentation of the RC point of view. Should someone want a more honest, less biased explanation of the "other side" so to speak, they might actually read one written by them. Otherwise, y'all are just ( I am not sure you'll get this protestant expression) "preachin' to the choir". Sorry to be have been so long-winded!
To: NYer
Lets see
according to the author Catholics believe the Bible is divinely inspired excepted
1) it was written by humans with all their mistakes,
2) no one know what the real bible said,
3) its infallible except for all those translation errors,
4) the Church should be the one to interpret this mishmash of human frailty, unknown text and translation errors,
5) its authoritative but, hey, the Church has more,
6) this God inspired book cant literally be true,
7) Catholic actually practice the humanistic, error-prone, bible based upon what a bunch of elderly gentlemen tell them. Fundamentalists simply are naive in believing in the Bible alone.
OK. I'm glad to see that Boston College still maintains it's high acedemic standards.
23
posted on
10/25/2006 12:27:52 PM PDT
by
HarleyD
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator
To: wagglebee
Actually, since the title lacks any direct reference to the Papacy or the Blessed Virgin Mary, the sola scriptura crowd might not even show up.**************
Page down a bit. :)
25
posted on
10/25/2006 12:31:20 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Bainbridge
"So you noticed that he uses terms that are rude, insulting and dismissive. But you hope that "fundamentalists" will not feel insulted or dismissed. . . ."
Obviously, the reaction you have expressed realizes the exact fears I had, given the critique I advanced of the language Kreeft uses. I hope that you will at least see that given the fact that I pointed out that Kreeft's article was not the way to address Fundamentalists, or Protestants, or any other non-Catholic Christian denomination or religious group that it is my intention to be much more respectful in my own exchanges.
26
posted on
10/25/2006 12:33:22 PM PDT
by
StJacques
(Liberty is always unfinished business)
To: NYer
But while fundamentalists see that God commanded the Churchs beginning, they do not see that He still dwells in it intimately, as a soul lives in its body and as He lives in faithful souls. For a fundamentalist, the Churchs origin is divine but its nature is human.***************
This seems to me to be a pretty important point in explaining the difference between Catholics and Fundamentalists/Evangelicals.
27
posted on
10/25/2006 12:35:27 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: NYer
Prods and Caths have far more in common then they have separate.
It's important that we keep together in political matters.
To: trisham
But it took almost two hours, if the title had been different, they would have been here in seconds!
29
posted on
10/25/2006 12:37:12 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: StJacques
Yes, I will credit you with your honest reaction to the piece. It is a credit to you that you saw that AND were willing to go out of your way to state this .
Thank you.
To: wagglebee
True. On the other hand, there are already two deleted posts. I'm not sure why.
31
posted on
10/25/2006 12:39:04 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: HarleyD
I'm glad to see that Boston College still maintains it's high acedemic standards. Well, perhaps they at least know how to correctly use "it's" and how to correctly spell "academic".
32
posted on
10/25/2006 12:39:16 PM PDT
by
Campion
("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
To: Campion
33
posted on
10/25/2006 12:40:51 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: trisham
I had checked a while ago and the first one that was deleted had not been deleted yet, I don't remember what it said, but I don't recall anything all that shocking as far as these threads go.
34
posted on
10/25/2006 12:41:07 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: zbigreddogz
Prods and Caths have far more in common then they have separate.************
Protestants and Catholics do have much in common. It's really unfortunate that there is often such bitterness coming between us.
35
posted on
10/25/2006 12:42:41 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: wagglebee
Me either. I didn't see the second one, though. Perhaps it was by the same poster, and was clearly offensive.
36
posted on
10/25/2006 12:43:54 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Campion
Well, perhaps they at least know how to correctly use "it's" and how to correctly spell "academic". LOL...touche'
37
posted on
10/25/2006 12:48:23 PM PDT
by
HarleyD
To: StJacques
StJacques, I agree with you to some extent. There is some strong language here, and we should try to avoid causing unnecessary offense. But I also think that there is a kind implicit relativism or pluralism inherent in an approach that refuses to say that X is wrong, or X is false, or X is mistaken, etc. That kind of pluralism is precisely what has sucked the air out of Post VII Catholicism, and it is against that relativism/pluralism that Kreeft is objecting even in his straightforward (no-mincing-words) language. We can and should recognize all the common ground we have with Protestants. But if we just stop there, then they will not know that they should become Catholic. It is not enough to show that the Catholic position is coherent or reasonable. We need to address the errors in Protestantism and show that they are errors, to show that Protestants are in some sense and to some degree separated from the one, holy catholic and apostolic Church. I'm a recent convert to Catholicism who was raised Protestant, and I was around Catholics for
years before one finally challenged me as to why I wasn't Catholic. Years!! Before that it was all "we're all Christians, and you're quite all right". I later discovered that documents such as "Unitatis Redintegratio" and "Ut Unum Sint" have been commonly misunderstand as an endorsement of religious pluralism, an endorsement of mutual understanding and respect as the ultimate goal of ecumenicism. I wish that more Catholics would, in charity, be honest with Protestants about the errors of Protestantism. That's the greatest favor that certain Catholics did for me in helping me become Catholic.
-A8
38
posted on
10/25/2006 12:57:32 PM PDT
by
adiaireton8
("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
To: trisham
Protestants and Catholics do have much in common. It's really unfortunate that there is often such bitterness coming between us. Glad someone got the point. I found the meat of Kreeft's article to offer a good clarification.
39
posted on
10/25/2006 12:58:37 PM PDT
by
NYer
(Apart from the cross, there is no other ladder by which we may get to Heaven. St. Rose of Lima)
To: adiaireton8
[loud applause from a cradle Catholic]
40
posted on
10/25/2006 1:01:12 PM PDT
by
Campion
("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-278 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson