Posted on 11/16/2010 10:21:55 AM PST by pastorbillrandles
I agree, I was just quoting them- we are going to have to prepare to re-iterate that because there are going to be people who did what the “Rational Response team” challenged them to do, who will later be driven mad because of what they think they have done!
You almost have to believe in evolution to be an atheist, and everybody who’s been following the discussion over the last few decades knows by now that evolution is a bunch of bullshit. The biggest group of people proportionally who don’t believe in evolution is probably mathematicians and not Christians; the doctrine is not compatible with modern mathematics and probability theory.
Sorry PastorBill, I realise now that I sounded cross in my reply. I was annoyed with the “Brights”, not with you.
A humble bunch of jerks, aren't they?
Most atheists I've met were narcissists.
I’m sure that prenatal infanticide (abortion), euthanasia, sexual perversion, and pornography are perfectly moral to these atheistic mavens of morality.
That pretty much describes most religions too. One person's religion is another person's superstition.
“For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” 1 Corninthains 1:18
> INSTRUCTIONS:You may damn yourself to Hell however you
> would like, but somewhere in your video you must say this
> phrase: “I deny the Holy Spirit.”
Whether these self-acclaimed “brights” are wittingly or unwittingly satanic, they are satanic nonetheless.
There is an opposite (and positive) side to the new atheism and that is its potential adherents have to exercise a significant degree of introspection and critical thinking to accept fundamental arguments of the movement. That in itself will lead to much rejection and commitment to the alternative of belief. Even Hitchens recognizes there is another argument of some merit and in doing so, sounds sometimes more agnostic than atheist. The real problem is not so much the aggressiveness of the new atheism, but the lukewarm resolve of the millions who call themselves Christians.
There is nothing new under the sun.
Until Kingdom Come, there always have been, and always will be, threats to Christian faith. If atheists weren’t threatened by Christianity, we’d have to be doing something wrong.
Every knee will bow ... eventually.
SnakeDoc
It is quite compatible. It is mainly incompatible to those who do not understand probability. But the largest group of people who accept natural selection are probably Christians, since most don't have a problem with it.
Yes, it is the education of our young. Atheists like Lenin knew you had to destroy family so you can convince young women to hand over their young to daycares....all to mold the thinking of the children—get them away from the parent’s ideology.
Mothers need to understand the supreme importance of the formative years. The first seven years should never be handed over to strangers and godless people. Never! The Founders of the past—true geniuses—had a solid foundation in their home for their first seven years and NO formal “education” which is nothing more than indoctrination in public schools and to learn social conformity and collective thinking. For emotional stability young children need to NOT be separated from the people that love them in their first seven years.
“They also insist that one doesn’t need God to be moral”... said the homo
With the body of a lion and the head of a social worker...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.