Shock: Dozens of ‘Christian’ Faith Leaders Sign Letter Supporting ‘Right to…Abortion’

LifeSite News ^ | 3/10/18 | Fr. Mark Hodges

[Revel]

Those so called leaders are not Christian.

[Blue Collar Christian]

Indeed. And He has no reason to lie, couldn’t if He did.

[robel]

If you’re a “Christian” leader and claim that homosexuality is acceptable, then abortion is the next step. I wonder what the step after that will be.

[Architect of Avalon]

I’m asking why they are allowed to reject responsibility to the point of being permitted to kill babies to avoid it.

[SoConPubbie]

I’m asking why they are allowed to reject responsibility to the point of being permitted to kill babies to avoid it.

Because 7 black-robed jurists decided that they could abuse the power given to them by the U.S. Constitution and decided to legislate from the bench and made up a right to privacy from thin air to justify the horrific sin of Abortion.

[hopespringseternal]

Many of the “mainline” churches let atheist draft dodgers into their seminaries to keep them out of Vietnam.

That fundamentally dishonest act has destroyed them.

[Salvation]

**Mainline Protestant denominations led the letter in both numbers and prestige, with a female United Methodist bishop and priestesses from the Presbyterian Churches USA, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, United Church of Christ, Disciples of Christ, American Baptist Churches USA, Reformed Church in America, Unity Church, Episcopal Church, and United Methodist Church signing the document.**

Not boding well at all for these groups. God will take care of it.

[Architect of Avalon]

Women are viewed as the owners of their daughters and sons to the extent of being permitted to treat their daughters and sons as their property to be destroyed at will.

[Marchmain]

Oregon moving along this road at a fast clip.

[Retvet]

If they support infanticide they are not Christian!

[editor-surveyor]

.
You know exactly what I mean.

[SoConPubbie]

You know exactly what I mean.

No, I don't.

I can't read your mind and you left a whole the size of a truck in terms of the murkiness of your post.

The real definition of Christian is Christ-like.

It is not murky, it is not a gray area, it is very black and white.

Your post, however, leaves a lot up to the interpretation of the reader.

[Tudorfly]

“...who say they are Christians...” They are not Christians. They could also call themselves grapefruits or oranges. That, also, would be untrue.

Still time to repent and accept Jesus Christ as their savior.

[editor-surveyor]

.
If the “real definition” of Christian is Christ-like, there are even fewer than I thought.

Actually the term “christians” was invented by Eusebuius when he modified the scriptures to please Constantine. They were actually known as the “Notzerim” (followers of the Netzer)

[Yulee]

I thought they were members of the Jewish sect called “The Way”.

[editor-surveyor]

.
>> “They could also call themselves grapefruits or oranges.” <<

Yep, it would be more truthful!
.

[editor-surveyor]

.
The Way was the term for the teachings of Yeshua, the Netzer. (literally “shoot from the root of Jesse.”) The way is the sole path to salvation when he returns to gather his sheep on the day of Trumpets (the “Last Trump” declared by Paul to the Corinthians)

Jewish at that time meant keepers of the false laws of the Pharisees, which no follower of Yeshua was. Now by common usage it can mean simply descendents of the tribe of Judah.

[DungeonMaster]

You can call a head witch in a coven a “faith leader”. They included the Unity church which might as well be Unitarian which might as well be a coven.