Posted on 04/25/2018 10:52:32 AM PDT by ebb tide
From Forbes article 2012: (Link below)
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel (Rahms brother) proposed in 2009, healthcare rationing based on third party (death panels?) determined factors. Patient age, expected quality adjusted life years, (decided by who?) and the patients instrumental value to society. (decided by who?). Given that the government would be making (and paying for) these rationing decisions, value to society will become value as determined by the government.
Such rationing completely inverts the relationship between the individual and the state. Rather than the state existing to serve the individual (as per U.S. Constitution), the individuals existence is sustained at the discretion of the state.
How is this different than an Old South plantation owner deciding the fate of an injured or sick slave (aka: human livestock) based only on their value to him?
As always, Ann nails it.
Oh and the judge is a sodomite faggot.
????
Terrible. Anyone remember that black girl in Oakland who was declared brain-dead by the hospital? Finally her parents got to take her home, but it was a real struggle. It did sound like she was half-way between life and death, but boy the state really fought hard to keep her so they could kill her.
Our greatest enemy and threat is none other than the 80% unconstitutional $4 federal government monster.
Dismantling the unconstitutional 80% is JOB #1. All the other issues will fade into insignificance if we don’t FIRST RESTORE our Free Constitutional Republic.
Wow, the Italians are there in the UK hospital, watching their citizen? I might have to move there. I love this. Keep up the good work, Lord. There’s a life to be saved.
The worship of the religion of the government is a chilling reminder of what is close ahead for America. Christianity is declining simultaneously with the ascendancy of the utopia as promised again by the hard left.
Revolution of some sort seems imminent. Hatred is intensifying on all fronts. Legal questions are being determined not as based on the law but rather a subjective intent. Laws are not applied equally. Fires have been lit with winds gathering in intensity. Our children rightly fear their future. Do you?
WHERE IS THE QUEEN?
She is harming the royal family enormously by remaining silent on this MORAL, not POLITICAL, issue.
Even if she doesn’t intervene, she can SPEAK. And if she won’t speak openly, she can let her remarks LEAK.
And her latest great-grandson, whose birth was on St. George’s Day, is always going to be juxtaposed against
the life of Alfie, which was thrown away.
The royals won’t be able to escape that comparison.
And why hasn’t the Queen stepped in with her popularity?
It’s not hard to believe that little Alfie has virtually no support among the hapless British subjects.
“How is this different than an Old South plantation owner deciding the fate of an injured or sick slave (aka: human livestock) based only on their value to him?”
Well for one things there were laws that required masters provide care for ill or slaves no longer able to work. And no court required owners to allow ill slaves to be killed.
Dear Father in Heaven thank-you for helping Alfie survive in spite of the overwhelming evil forces wanting to take his life. Please lift the veil of deceit, and remove the scales from the eyes of the British people, that they will not let these wicked liars prevail. Grant them courage and rise up heroes to free Alfie from the monsters trying to end his life-Amen
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.