Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thoughts on The Timing Of The Rapture
https://billrandles.wordpress.com/2020/05/08/thoughts-on-the-timing-of-the-rapture/ ^ | 05-09-20 | Bill Randles

Posted on 05/08/2020 4:37:58 PM PDT by pastorbillrandles

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,001-2,0202,021-2,0402,041-2,0602,061-2,075 last
To: All

From MHGinTN: Jude 1:18 How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts. Signed MHGinTN


See 2 Peter 3:3 (similar language) Talking about Mockers and Scoffers denying the second coming of Christ. BTW, will you remind me which chapter and verse talks about Christians calling other Christians dirty, disgusting, Adventist cult dolts? Hypocrite!


2,061 posted on 07/25/2020 10:22:35 PM PDT by Philsworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2059 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

The last week of Daniel’s 70th week was chopped off for the same reason the last half of Isaiah 61:2 was “chopped off” in Luke 4:19. Did you ever notice that and wonder WHY Christ did not finish Isaiah’s 61:2 ?

There is a reason.


You might at least TRY to cite a text that uses the day for a year CONTINUOUS TIME PROPHECY FORMULA, given by God. Here you fail. You do not know how to “rightly divide the word of God”


2,062 posted on 07/25/2020 10:34:07 PM PDT by Philsworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2060 | View Replies]

To: smvoice; All
Luke 4:19 (SDA Bible Commentary)

Acceptable year. That is, the gospel age, when those who feel their spiritual need (the poor in spirit), those with contrite hearts (the brokenhearted), those who have been captives of sin and blinded to spiritual things, and those who have been wounded and crushed by the evil one, may expect release from sin. The ―acceptable year of the Lord‖ is reminiscent of the year of jubilee, when slaves were freed, debts were canceled, and entailed land was turned back to its original owner (see on Lev. 25:10, 15, 24).

At this point Jesus ended His reading of Isa. 61:1, 2. The next clause, which was to the patriotic Jew the climax of the entire passage—―the day of vengeance of our God‖— He did not read. The Jews fondly believed that salvation was for them and retribution for the Gentiles (see Ps. 79:6). The Jewish idea that salvation was a matter of nationality rather than a personal submission to God blinded the people to the true nature of Christ‘s mission and led them to reject Him. They expected the Messiah to appear as a powerful prince at the head of a mighty army, to vanquish all their oppressors and bring the world under Israel‘s power (DA 30, 236).

This fundamental misconception arose from the fact that the Jews deliberately overlooked those prophecies that spoke of a suffering Messiah and misapplied those that pointed to the glory of His second coming (DA 30). It was pride, prejudice, and preconceived opinion that led them into this state of spiritual blindness (see DA 65, 212, 242). They were blind to the fact that it is not the amount of light that shines upon a man that counts, but the use made of that light. They delighted to dwell on the idea that the judgment of God was reserved for others, and may have been surprised when Jesus did not so much as mention this. When, in His sermon, Jesus extolled the faith of the heathen, thus implying the Jews‘ own lack of it, the audience was beside itself with resentment and fury (see vs. 25–29).

For further comment on the false concepts of the Jews concerning the Messianic kingdom see on Matt. 3:7; 4:9; 5:2, 3; Luke 1:68. For comment on the true nature of the kingdom see on Matt. 3:2, 3; 4:17; 5:2, 3; Mark 3:14.

2,063 posted on 07/25/2020 10:41:27 PM PDT by Philsworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2060 | View Replies]

To: Philsworld; MHGinTN

Isaiah 61:2 with Luke 4:19 is the very EPITOME of rightly DIVIDING, Phil. Christ did not finish verse 2 because the first part of v. 2 deals with the first coming of Christ. And the second part refers to the second coming of Christ. Christ stopped with the first half because He was fulfilling it. He did not quote the last half because He knew that was FUTURE. The Tribulation. Daniel’s 70th week. “The day of VENGEANCE of our God.”
Christ RIGHTLY DIVIDED Isaiah 61:2. And it’s been over 2000 years since it was rightly divided.


2,064 posted on 07/26/2020 12:06:09 PM PDT by smvoice (I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2062 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
Did you even read the article I linked to? It's not very long and it's easy reading and informative. Daniel's 70 week prophecy IS SPECIFICALLY A DAY FOR A YEAR-TIMED PROPHECY and cannot under any circumstances be separated. Same for the 2300 day-year prophecy, same for the 1260 day-year prophecy. It is CONTINUOUS IN IT'S TOTALITY. And, I have not even mentioned the fact that you have certainly misunderstood the prophecy. It has NOTHING to do with a 7 year tribulation period or peace deal with the Antichrist, ZERO. It has everything to do with "The 70 weeks were 490 literal years that were a period of probation for national Israel:"

It has a starting point and ending point.

CONCLUSION

The 70 weeks were 490 literal years that were a period of probationy for national Israel:

Dan 9:24-27 (KJV)

24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. 25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem [457 B.C., Ezra 7] unto [the coming of] the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks [7 + 62 = 69 weeks, 27 A.D.]: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. 26 And after threescore and two [62] weeks shall Messiah [the prince] be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of [Messiah] the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. 27 And he [Messiah the Prince] shall confirm the covenant with many for one week [7 years]: and in the midst of the [70th] week [31 A.D.] he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease [be crucified as the lamb of God], and for [because of] the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Note that unlike futurists, this interpretation does not find any reference to the Antichrist, or a 7 year peace treaty signed with the Jews, or a broken peace treaty / desecration of the Temple by the antichrist, or a 7 year tribulation. I think the evidence presented here shows that the focus of the 70 weeks of Daniel is a fixed 490 year ultimatum to the Jews and a prediction of the baptism and crucifixion of Jesus, as well as pointing to the start of judgment at the end of the 2300 years. Since the Jews did not repent of their transgressions, and rejected the Christ, their Temple and city were destroyed and the survivors scattered. So now the Gospel is preached to one and all, which began at the end of the 70th week, in 34 A.D.

The futurist interpretation of this passage denies the prophecy of Jesus' baptism in verse 24. It also denies His crucifixion in verse 27 and applies it instead to the antichrist, in an astounding twisting of scripture. I submit the futurist's house is built on sand and will not stand scrutiny. They do not have a case, they have a relatively recent fairy tale designed to obscure the truth and spread confusion, whether they know it or not. The author of that futurist fairy tale is the Catholic Church, specifically a Spanish Jesuit priest by the name of Francisco Ribera (1537-1591). During the counterreformation he concocted the futurist interpretation to deflect reformist claims that the Papacy was the Antichrist of scripture. There is apparently no evidence that the futurist interpretation predates the Catholic counterreformation. It was intended as a smoke screen, and it still works today to a large degree.

I will post the link, AGAIN, in the following post so I don't get the link function wrong (still working out the HTML bugs).

2,065 posted on 07/26/2020 12:42:26 PM PDT by Philsworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2064 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/dan927.htm


2,066 posted on 07/26/2020 12:43:18 PM PDT by Philsworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2064 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

BTW, most of post 2065 cited that article.


2,067 posted on 07/26/2020 12:47:25 PM PDT by Philsworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2064 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

Where you did not correctly divide the word of God was in comparing those texts to A SPECIFIC DAY FOR A YEAR TIME PROPHECY. Totally unrelated. Then, you totally misinterpreted the meaning of the prophecy.


2,068 posted on 07/26/2020 1:05:59 PM PDT by Philsworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2064 | View Replies]

To: Philsworld

I’m so sorry. You just cannot see
Or hear. Or perceive. The god of this world has blinded you, lest you see, and be saved. Have a safe journey through this life. The one to come will be unrelenting.


2,069 posted on 07/26/2020 2:09:53 PM PDT by smvoice (I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2068 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

Nothing to be sorry about. You believe the lies of Satan. I don’t. I put facts right in front of your nose and you ignore them. You refuse to even try to understand my points. You’ve had plenty of chances. You cannot say to anyone that you didn’t have the opportunity.

Your belief in the pre trib rapture fails. You cannot explain the one critical flaw. I actually feel sorry for you.


2,070 posted on 07/26/2020 3:07:46 PM PDT by Philsworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2069 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

Another day has passed. Why can’t anyone explain why pre trib rapture believers chop off the last week of Daniel’s 70 week continuous time prophecy, given by God, and transport it by UFO 2000 years into the future? Why can’t MHGinTN explain it? (I’ll give smvoice credit for at least trying)

http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/dan927.htm


2,071 posted on 07/26/2020 8:07:16 PM PDT by Philsworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2050 | View Replies]

To: GBA
Sabbath remains on Saturday. As Christians we since the days of the Apostles have CELEBRATED the resurrection of the Lord on the Lord's Day - Sunday


2,072 posted on 09/28/2020 2:54:02 AM PDT by Cronos (19 years on FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

To: GBA
>Matthew 28:1: "Now after the Sabbath, as the first day of the week began to dawn, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the tomb."

Mark 16:2: "Very early in the morning, on the first day of the week, they came to the tomb when the sun had risen."

Acts 20:7: "Now on the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul, ready to depart the next day, spoke to them and continued his message until midnight."

I Corinthians 16:2: "On the first day of the week let each one of you lay something aside, storing up as he may prosper that there be no collections when I come."

Remember Mark 2:27 says, "The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath." and

"One man regards one day above another, another regards every day alike. Let each man be fully convinced in his own mind. 6 He who observes the day, observes it for the Lord, and he who eats, does so for the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he who eats not, for the Lord he does not eat, and gives thanks to God," (Rom. 14:5-6).
and
"Therefore let no one act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day— 17things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ." (Col. 2:16-17).
A festival is yearly. A new moon is monthly. A Sabbath is weekly. No one is to act as your judge in regard to this. The Sabbath is defined as the mere shadow of what is to come (Jesus), the reality is Jesus. Jesus is our Sabbath. This is in reference to Isaiah 1:13 13 Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting.

.

Besides "And on the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul began talking to them, intending to depart the next day, and he prolonged his message until midnight," (Acts 20:7).
as imadrmd1 wrote The people of Christ met originally in the evening pf the Roman midnight-to-midnight day of which the time before sundown was still Sabbath. To the Jew, the evening was the beginning of the sundown-to-sundown first day of the week.

"And upon the first dayof the weekσαββατων (sabbaton), when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight" (Acts 20:7 AV).

For at least 30 years after the resurrection/ascension of Jesus (Pentecost was on the first day of the week, likewise) the disciples met in the evening of the day of which the daylight was still Jewish Sabbath, thereby not violating Jewish sensitivities.

"Upon the first day of the weekσαββατων let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath prospered him, that there be no gatherings when I come" (1 Cor. 16:2 AV).

The Corinthians were commanded by Paul to meet on the first of the week and have their tithes ready to be gathered each week.

The whole week is a heptad, a bundle of seven, a week of days, a "sabbath" of days, wherein the last day for Jews was set aside for rest from work. But the evenin of that last day is the first day of a new sabbath of days, hence it is also a (new) sabbath.

If you are a sabbatarian, avvording to the law you musy stay at home, go no place, and do no woek. But also if you wish to thus come inder the Law, you must obey the law, all of it, without fail. And doing so will send you to Hades/Hell in it in any way. You cannot be a Christian and be a sabbatarian.

2,073 posted on 09/28/2020 2:56:22 AM PDT by Cronos (19 years on FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
You cannot be a Christian and be a sabbatarian.

I wonder if Jesus forgives those who remember the sabbath day and keep it holy or if that is yet another unforgivable sin.

Thanks for all of the research behind finding those quotes and for putting them all in one place!

2,074 posted on 09/28/2020 8:45:16 AM PDT by GBA (Here in the matrix, merrily, merrily, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2073 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Regarding the Sabbath day and the first day or the Eighth day, I view the Sabbath day as unchanged by Jesus or by man.

I believe that in both life and in “death”, Jesus kept the Sabbath and ... before He rose from the dead ... He shared with and preached to those who most needed to hear His Good News on His first Sabbath day after being sacrificed.

And I believe that He Is Risen! ... and on that first day, just like His Father before Him, He also created a new world out of the darkness.

I think it makes sense that Christians celebrate this day with other believers, as did Jesus, but it is still the first day of the week or the “Eighth day”, but not the seventh or Sabbath day.

The Sabbath day, to me, is not changeable by man.

I believe The 10 Commandments were given to all of us by our Father.

They are His Laws for His creation ... us. All of us, even for His Son, our Savior.

God, the Father, wrote His Laws in stone with His Hand.

Moses wrote his laws on paper with his human hand. Jesus tore that contract in half.

If I’m wrong, I’m wrong, but I think the Father’s Laws remain in effect until He says otherwise.

In my humble opinion, of course ... ymmv.

2,075 posted on 09/30/2020 11:09:28 AM PDT by GBA (Here in the matrix, merrily, merrily, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2073 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,001-2,0202,021-2,0402,041-2,0602,061-2,075 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson