Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Plan Senate Vote on Radical Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ Bill by End of September
LifeSite News ^ | 9/8/22 | Calvin Freiburger

Posted on 09/11/2022 6:30:53 PM PDT by marshmallow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: marshmallow

Democrats are simply passing a stupid law to blame others for not supporting their stupidity. “Look at him! He doesn’t support our stupid laws!!”


21 posted on 09/11/2022 8:09:15 PM PDT by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
117th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 8404

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

July 20, 2022

_______________________________________________________________________

AN ACT

To repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and ensure respect for State regulation of marriage, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Respect for Marriage Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SECTION ADDED TO TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, BY SECTION 2 OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT.

Section 1738C of title 28, United States Code, is repealed.

SEC. 3. FULL FAITH AND CREDIT GIVEN TO MARRIAGE EQUALITY. Chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, as amended by this Act, is further amended by inserting after section 1738B the following:
``Sec. 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof
``(a) In General.--No person acting under color of State law may deny--
``(1) full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or
``(2) a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.
``(b) Enforcement by Attorney General.--The Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate United States district court against any person who violates subsection (a) for declaratory and injunctive relief.
``(c) Private Right of Action.--Any person who is harmed by a violation of subsection (a) may bring a civil action in the appropriate United States district court against the person who violated such subsection for declaratory and injunctive relief.
``(d) State Defined.--In this section, the term `State' has the meaning given such term under section 7 of title 1.''.

SEC. 4. MARRIAGE RECOGNITION.

Section 7 of title 1, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 7. Marriage
``(a) For the purposes of any Federal law, rule, or regulation in which marital status is a factor, an individual shall be considered married if that individual's marriage is valid in the State where the marriage was entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any State, if the marriage is valid in the place where entered into and the marriage could have been entered into in a State.
``(b) In this section, the term `State' means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States.
``(c) For purposes of subsection (a), in determining whether a marriage is valid in a State or the place where entered into, if outside of any State, only the law of the jurisdiction applicable at the time the marriage was entered into may be considered.''.

SEC. 5. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision of this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision to any person, entity, government, or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, or any amendment made thereby, or the application of such provision to all other persons, entities, governments, or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.

22 posted on 09/11/2022 8:27:26 PM PDT by aimhigh (THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Shaking the Gay money tree for donations and voters...


23 posted on 09/11/2022 8:30:53 PM PDT by GOPJ (Biden's 'WAR ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE' speech is history's Jimmah Carter's BIG RABBIT blunder..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Sell-out republicans will make certain queer “marriage” is codified into law. They are scared to death they might lose a vote from the “independents” if they don’t. This country lost its moral compass years ago. Th United States is a God-less nation and has been for years.


24 posted on 09/12/2022 6:48:41 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

“ It’s going to pass. Again, there is no opposition party”

You got that right. Ron Johnson from Wisconsin, who most people think it’s an arch conservative has said he’ll probably vote for it. He’s in a tough re-election battle and will throw common sense and morality under the bus to get re-elected. I trust no Republican.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/09/ron-johnson-marriage-vote-republicans/


25 posted on 09/12/2022 7:01:02 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson