Posted on 01/13/2023 6:49:37 PM PST by marshmallow
Yes,it’s true that most atheists cannot believe it.
Yes, the slippery slope is very real.
in the long view of our society, it is always better when you have sound marriages with children....
Vat 2 basically said that reproduction was not the main reason for sex, that sex was for pleasure as well...."mutual satisfaction" of the partners....
so we've reduced the reproduction act to one of satisfaction....so if joe and jerry like to shove it up each others arse, and its satisfying, so be it....
we need parameters and we need societal norms and we have none....everything and any thing goes....
The final battle will be centered on the family... the image of our trinitarian God. Some are giving up without much of a fight.
It’s the Word of God. I just can’t believe it! - Sez the evil man.
More like the Bishop of Sodom. Days of Lot return.
Some are giving up without much of a fight.
Many, many, are agnostic and ignorant. Can’t we just Coexist, with everyone just being nice nice.
And not a Libertarian stance of Just Leave Me Alone, but a self righteous stance of Karen Kommandoes educating everyone how to be nice nice.
Gotta ask, where Karens born that way, or is there a BossyBitch School, and something in their diet sodas and wine that makes so many of them terminally stupid?
Yeah, all four of them.
Scripture is now optional in the Church of England.
It’s sinful because God says it is sinful.
No offense intended here to any Anglicans or Episcopalians, and despite the fact that his Wikipedia page asserts the good “Rt Rev Dr John Inge” has been married twice and has two daughters, but I suspect like many clergy of all faiths, that dude is either a closet-homosexual, a sociopath, a rapist, a serial killer or a psychopathy.
Time your pick, but that dude is not a man of God and his words are worthless.
Gad as a metaphor for ruling class interests, right?
What is your citation in Vatican 2 documents, for your "Vat 2 basically said...." claim?
While I'm not thrilled with some of the ambiguity in Vatican 2, which allowed the ill-willed to make changes that were never intended, I'm not aware of anything that supports your assertion.
And yes, I have a copy at hand.
Romans 1
26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural,
27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error.
Even the C of E has stopped following the teachings of Christ and going their own way,,,,,,Wrath of God will be upon us.
Believe your instincts, not Bible (The Word of God). Does this sound to you like a path to Paradise?
[[’I Cannot Believe It’s Inherently Sinful’: Bishop]]
Guess the Bishop doesn’t read the bible. Hey Bishop- it’s so sinful that God calls it the strongest word He can- An Abomination!
Rebelling against God isn’t a good look for a so-called religious leader.
Wanker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.