Posted on 06/27/2004 6:33:08 PM PDT by blam
Pong
It must be gibberish.
Mystery solved.
Uh huh.
So, it's the medieval version of Kerry Kampaign talking points, then?
If Scientific American can't figure out something, it wouldn't be the first time.
i was sold when they said it had drawings of nude women
I had a car that sounded like that.
What exactly was the 'hit piece' that Scientific American published? I understand that they're behind all the left wing pseudoscientific causes like human-induced global warming.
"Within a decade, however, critics debunked Newbold's solution by showing that the alleged microscopic features of the letters were actually natural cracks in the ink."
I guess it's not all it's cracked-up to be.
I don't find this convincing. Why? Because Dee and Kelley are known to have created fascinating works -- in a created language ("Enochian") and with a unique alphabet. But their manuscripts can be easily deciphered and do NOT contain gibberish.
So -- if you have something which cannot be deciphered, and which appears to be gibberish and which uses a completely different unique alphabet -- why ascribe it to Kelley and Dee? Because they are convenient? Is that science? And why assume its gibberish, just because you can't figure it out? Is that science?
I don't buy it.
The argument is that there was a way to create repetitive gibberish in the time we believe the book to be written. One of the people associated with the book probably knew of this method, this combined with the inability to translate means it is just gibberish?
Here's a thought. What if is a series of encoded mantras. One would expect extreme repetition. Consider the "Hari Krishna" mantra;
Hari Krishna, Hari Krishna, Hari Hari, Krishna Krishna. Hari Rama, Hari Rama, Rama Rama, Krishna Krishna
Or perhaps even simpler, what if it is a short message encoded several different ways again and again?
Overall, I think that the common modern view that those in the past were idiots is rearing its ugly head here. We moderns can't translate it, and those idiots certainly couldn't have created a code we can't crack, so it must be mere gibberish.
Bet it's the location of the Lost Dutchman!
I think that's proof they had alien technology in ancient times!
Nice bit of work here actually, in the James Randi style. When trying to prove that something is NOT a hoax, get a good hoaxer to try to get the same results! Randi has debunked many psychics. Anyways, this guy goes and generates a code that is similar to Voynich. Does it prove that its a hoax? No, just that it COULD be, which contradicts the opinions of various researchers in the past. I'm not ready to call it a hoax yet, but I think its time to start sharpening ole Occams Razor.
This absence of evidence does not prove that the manuscript was a hoax, but my work shows that the construction of a hoax as complex as the Voynich manuscript was indeed feasible.
So, he doesn't claim the manuscript to be a hoax, just that it was possible in the era to have constructed a hoax of such sophistication.
Ok... I admit it.
I wrote it.
I gave it to Al Gore and he turned it in as his thesis at Divinity School.
bump
I'm not sure the experts ever decyphered the script found on Easter Island either...very interesting stuff.
gdc314
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.