Is that a GOLD chair he’s sitting on?
Posted on 09/26/2004 8:30:20 AM PDT by FITZ
Catholic countries like those in Latin America, Haiti are fairly good examples of the effectiveness of the Catholic Church when it comes to government and it's influence over it's own super-rich.
"Government is not the solution, government is the problem."
I wonder what happened to this Pope's anti-Communist stance. It's sad to see all this happen to him.
Is that a GOLD chair he’s sitting on?
I visited Castel Gandolfo a couple of years ago. I didn't actually get into the palace, but I walked around it. Gorgeous place and breathtaking setting, overlooking a lake in the hills outside Rome. Being Pope has its perks.
Pope isnt Communist. Hes admotely against Liberation Theology in Latin America. Thats Marxism plus Catholicism. I think he just wants to help poor people not steal from the rich and give to the poor. Thats not his ideas -- unless hes radically changed in the last few months but I doubt it.
Also id expect JP2 to support Bush simpply because the Vatican has denounced John Kerry for supporting Gay Marriage and Abortion (hes on their Do not give communion lists heh)
"I would advise him to stick to matters involving the soul - and we'll handle the 'material world' ..."
Maybe they are one and the same to him. Didn't Christ say there would always be poor among us?
Does a pope ever declare his wealth???
This church has a real credibility problem by taking Saddam's side when it was Saddam's way rob, rape, imprison, and slaughter millions of his own people.
I agree with you, for a guy that helped the Polish resistance in WWII and helped bring down Communism in Eastern Europe, it seems strange that he makes statements like this. I think his illness has left him at the mercy of his "advisors".
Give me your house, your car, your gun, your dog, your job, your bed, your yard, your ranch, your . . ping.
Anybody, Pope or not, who calls for a reduction of inequality of wealth is a socialist. Why? Because once you start to call for equalizing the "imbalance," there's no logical place to stop until you reach equality. Of course, the latter condition is so contrary to human nature that it requires massive government intervention to enforce and leads inexorably to totalitarianism.
Next time you hear someone say, disapprovingly, "the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer," ask the person what the correct balance would be. If s/he says anything other than perfect equality, bore in and demand to know who should determine what is the right balance and who can cause it to happen. You will rapidly force him/her to assign that responsibility to the government. You have now identified another socialist.
I agree.
Are you talking about the rich young ruler? (Matthew 19)
How do you know he did not? And where does it say Jesus resurrected him?
Sure hope the pope likes the spanish redistribution.
The Pope could begin with selling off a lot of Vatican property. No one is forcing them to keep all the art, jewels, gold, and real estate to themselves.
Headline should read;
POPE SUPPORTS EFFORTS TO LIQUIDATE CHURCH’S WEALTH TO HELP THE POOR
You are not a Catholic.
Your post is what is hypocritical.
It is rumored that the Vatican, owns Bank Of America, at least a few years ago.
"The particular church he "leads" is the richest on earth".
And in most cases its the poorest people thats donating
funds to that church
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.