Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Genes Promoting Fertility Are Found in Europeans
New York Times ^ | January 16, 2005 | Nicholas Wade

Posted on 01/16/2005 5:11:46 PM PST by 4mor3

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2005 5:11:46 PM PST by 4mor3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 4mor3

This is really, really interesting. Thanks for posting it.


2 posted on 01/16/2005 5:19:58 PM PST by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4mor3; martin_fierro; Willie Green; boris
Decode's alternative proposal is that the flipped version was carried for many years in a different human lineage, one of the archaic populations that preceded the emergence of anatomically modern humans in Africa 150,000 years ago.

So that's what King Kong was wanting to do with the blonde!

3 posted on 01/16/2005 5:32:54 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
Whoops, I didn't preview. The quote should be:

Decode's alternative proposal is that the flipped version was carried for many years in a different human lineage, one of the archaic populations that preceded the emergence of anatomically modern humans in Africa 150,000 years ago. Then, in some episode of rape or interbreeding, a single copy of the flipped version entered the modern human lineage some time before humans left Africa 60,000 years ago.

4 posted on 01/16/2005 5:34:24 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xJones
If the particular genetic lineage is found in only 20% of European populations, why would the "cross" have occurred in Africa?

Seems to me we have evidence of a "cross" in Europe at a later time, say when Neandertals and Cro-Magnon people co-existed.

The far smaller incidence of this genetic lineage occuring in African or Asian populations is probably due more to the romantic failure of Western European adventurers than any other factor.

5 posted on 01/16/2005 6:03:46 PM PST by muawiyah (Egypt didn't invent civilization time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 4mor3

I guess this explains the falling European birth rate--Not!


6 posted on 01/16/2005 6:10:16 PM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Pingaroo...


7 posted on 01/16/2005 6:22:14 PM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4mor3
Researchers in Iceland have discovered a region in the human genome that, among Europeans, appears to promote fertility, and maybe longevity as well.

Though the region, a stretch of DNA on the 17th chromosome, occurs in people of all countries, it is much more common in Europeans, as if its effect is set off by something in the European environment.

Bordeaux.

8 posted on 01/16/2005 6:54:20 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church
"Pingaroo..."

Got it, thanks. Very interesting.

9 posted on 01/16/2005 9:15:36 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

GGG Ping.


10 posted on 01/16/2005 9:16:18 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 4mor3

I don't see any evidence in this article that the inversion has anything to do with fertility. They don't even know why the inversion would affect fertility. I'd like to see how they removed confounding factors.


11 posted on 01/16/2005 9:32:01 PM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

"I guess this explains the falling European birth rate--Not!"

My guess is birth control and abortion explains that.

My question is, what do they mean a gene that promotes fertility? How do they know that it promotes fertility and in what way does it promote it?


12 posted on 01/16/2005 9:41:16 PM PST by johnwayne (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 4ConservativeJustices; ...
Thanks Blam.
The Neandertal Enigma
by James Shreeve
Frayer's own reading of the record reveals a number of overlooked traits that clearly and specifically link the Neandertals to the Cro-Magnons. One such trait is the shape of the opening of the nerve canal in the lower jaw, a spot where dentists often give a pain-blocking injection. In many Neandertal, the upper portion of the opening is covered by a broad bony ridge, a curious feature also carried by a significant number of Cro-Magnons. But none of the alleged 'ancestors of us all' fossils from Africa have it, and it is extremely rare in modern people outside Europe." [pp 126-127]

Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

13 posted on 01/17/2005 7:44:56 AM PST by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on January 13, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
...and it is extremely rare in modern people outside Europe

Does this exclude or include the major populations of North America and Australia that were settled by Europeans?

14 posted on 01/17/2005 7:54:07 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA

Includes. :') Glad that message got through to you. The "posting message" went blank, as it were done and about to reload the topic, but it wouldn't finish. As a "V", you're quite near the end of the 300 or so FReepers on the ping list. :')


15 posted on 01/17/2005 7:58:32 AM PST by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on January 13, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

What ping list??





j/k


16 posted on 01/17/2005 8:17:10 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 4mor3
The problem that I have with their common ancestor theory is that they always seem to discount multiple seperate versions of teh same mutation. If a mutation that shifts a while segment of chromosomes can happen once, it could happen twice or more.
17 posted on 01/17/2005 8:20:55 AM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
So that's what King Kong was wanting to do with the blonde!

...and it sounds like he gaver her lice too. This is exactly the kind of thing your mother warned you about.

18 posted on 01/17/2005 9:09:48 AM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
Looking for any physical consequence, the Decode researchers found that women carrying the flipped or inverted section tend to have slightly more children.

I wonder how large their sample was.

19 posted on 01/17/2005 11:43:18 AM PST by Max in Utah (By their works you shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Thanks for the ping...very interesting.


20 posted on 01/17/2005 7:08:54 PM PST by Pharmboy (Listen...you can still hear the old media sobbing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson