Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archaeologist Unearths Bibical Controversy
Globe And Mail ^ | 1-25-2005 | Michael Valpy

Posted on 01/26/2005 8:44:58 PM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last
To: SandRat

Archaelogists have unearthed a site they believe to be ancient Troy - it matches the description given by Homer. Should this be used as proof that the Olympians were real gods?


41 posted on 01/27/2005 3:34:13 AM PST by PFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
This kind of bickering accomplished little. The dispute of the minimalists is (in my opinion) a waste of time and energy.

…so David and Solomon, rather than being mighty monarchs, were mere petty chieftains.

One people’s Mighty Monarch is another’s petty chieftain. Where is the line drawn? Is it in square miles of controlled territory, population, and accumulated wealth? If so, what is the demarcation?

Their findings mean that those scholars convinced that the Hebrew Old Testament is at best a compendium of revisionist, fragmented history, mixed with folklore and theology, and at worst a piece of outright propaganda, likely will have to apply the brakes to their thinking.

Remove the theology and I am reminded of my government school history texts – a mix of fragmented history and folklore. It also reminds me of some of the scholarly papers I have read – material that fails to back the writers point of view is ignored.
42 posted on 01/27/2005 3:48:56 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Gee imagine that! The Old Testament and the Torah are accurate documents as revealed by GOD.

On this point it is. That does not mean the entire work is 100% historical truth – the story of Jericho is a case in point.
43 posted on 01/27/2005 3:51:51 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

Shocked to see the Globe and Mail would even touch this story. However, I'm not shocked to see the scoffers and mockers on this thread. Such was also foretold.


44 posted on 01/27/2005 4:21:26 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Youngblood
Or as a cantor put it to me, when my age was in single digits, the miracles weren't miracles because they occurred -- almost all of them are scientifically plausible. The miracle is that they happened at the exact right moment -- sometimes the exact second -- to be useful.
45 posted on 01/27/2005 4:47:39 AM PST by Celtjew Libertarian (Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoHebrew
Who said the book of Samuel was revealed by God? Not Jews or Christians .... it was "revealed" by history and men.

Well, I know that Catholics and evangelical Christians all say the book of Samuel was divinely inspired. I guess that's close enough to revealed by God.

46 posted on 01/27/2005 5:37:58 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Dataman

Ping


47 posted on 01/27/2005 5:45:58 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

ping


48 posted on 01/27/2005 5:49:07 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

bump


49 posted on 01/27/2005 6:20:27 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

The Old Testament is not history - just one example of its errors - and there are many - exclude it from being a history - bbut still a useful refrence book pf myths, allegories and pseudo-history.


50 posted on 01/27/2005 6:42:39 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Junior
But everyone knows Radiocarbon dating is flawed!
/sarcasm

It works quite well when it reveals the truth. Otherwise, it's the devil's tool. (As are you!)

51 posted on 01/27/2005 6:58:29 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA

"Draw them in with fascinating evidence, don't push them away with a personal, political or religious vendetta."

Vendetta???? So exposing a whole industry, whether it be political, educational, economic or religious, for hiding "truth" is a vendetta. Maybe time has come for the chips to fall where they may.

Actually one should be asking themselves what else has been hidden from the beginning!


52 posted on 01/27/2005 7:02:42 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: djf

Visit the E's their peer reviews and art work. They have figured out this earth is more than 6,000 years old but that is about it.


53 posted on 01/27/2005 7:07:39 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Who is going to take a vendetta seriously?
That is how the info will be ignored and the same old standard continue to be taught to another generation.

The historical record is not to be measured against your vendetta, nor taught according to it. That's as false a premise as the Bible-hating one is. The record must be constructed objectively, and let the evidence itself direct the world to an understanding of history that includes the Bible as an accurate account.


54 posted on 01/27/2005 7:18:24 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Destro

"The Old Testament is not history - just one example of its errors - and there are many - exclude it from being a history - bbut still a useful refrence book pf myths, allegories and pseudo-history."


Ok Destro whatever, not my job to pull the scales from your eyes.


55 posted on 01/27/2005 7:19:38 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
"Who is going to take a vendetta seriously?
That is how the info will be ignored and the same old standard continue to be taught to another generation."

Ah but you see, I have no vendetta, and if you had read there are some with eyes to see and ears to hear, and some are blinded for their own protection and then there are some who know the truth and spend their whole life hiding it.

Let us not forget who is in control and who allows these things to be. Check out what was told to Gideon it still applies to this day.

Judges 7:2 And the LORD said unto Gideon, "The People that are with thee are too many for ME to give the Midianites into their hands, lest Israel vaunt themselves against ME, saying, 'Mine own hand hath saved me.'

Now you cannot say for certainty that exposing those who have made a living from discrediting the Bible are not getting a little Heavenly comeuppance.
56 posted on 01/27/2005 7:29:08 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Historical errors in the Old Testament

I do not base my faith in God based on the historical errors of the book - only on the spiritual works.

The Hebrews themselves did not create the bible as a history - in fact history as a was created by the classical Greeks centuries later. The bible was created as a spiritual guide rather than a history lesson.

57 posted on 01/27/2005 7:39:29 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA

You are 100% correct. The Old Testament was never written to be a history. How could they? History was invented by the Greeks centuries later.


58 posted on 01/27/2005 7:42:38 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"I do not base my faith in God based on the historical errors of the book - only on the spiritual works."

I have yet to see you quote anything from the Bible.


"The Hebrews themselves did not create the bible as a history - in fact history as a was created by the classical Greeks centuries later. The bible was created as a spiritual guide rather than a history lesson."


Yes indeed Destro that is why Paul tells us ICorinthians 10:11 Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples (examples): and they are written for our admonition, (warning) upon whom the ends of the world (age) are come.

So Destro given what Paul says this is history and what took place then is the SCRIPT for which is to come. Maybe you might need to read the SCRIPT to have a clue which ensample we are repeating at this time.

But hey nobody is going to force to you read that history.
59 posted on 01/27/2005 7:45:38 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: All

Interesting.


60 posted on 01/27/2005 7:52:59 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson