Skip to comments.
Carthage Tries To Live Down Image As Site Of Infanticide
Post-Gazette/Wall Street Journal ^
| 5-26-2004
| Andrew Higgins
Posted on 05/27/2005 12:20:44 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
To: blam
Why should Muslims be ashamed of historical infanticide, even if they were a continuation of the same people? They show no discomfort at modern infanticide, even the mass-murder kind. Note their total silence about Beslan.
21
posted on
05/27/2005 12:48:33 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government)
To: yarddog
I also recall that many Egyptians were angry that we had a Negro portray Sadat in a movie.Which is really funny. Because the American Negro in question was a dead ringer for him.
22
posted on
05/27/2005 12:49:46 PM PDT
by
Restorer
To: Sam the Sham
By the way, Greeks and Romans and just about every other ancient race also practiced infanticide; some were more honest than others about their reasons for doing so.
And we also. We do it in the name of women's rights.
To: Restorer
He did look a lot like him.
24
posted on
05/27/2005 12:51:40 PM PDT
by
yarddog
To: wideawake
In addition to sacrifice only healthy born babies were permitted to live.
To: blam
"Carthago Delende Est"
("Carthage Must be Destroyed!")
--Cato
There is much we can learn from the Romans.
26
posted on
05/27/2005 12:53:30 PM PDT
by
Airborne1986
(Well, You can do what you want to us, but we're not going to sit here while you badmouth the U.S.A.)
To: Graymatter
To: Graymatter
Ah, but the Carthaginians did it publicly with fire, while the Greeks and Romans did it quietly in the wilderness at night through exposure, and we do it secretly in clinics with suction machines.
Therefore we're superior.
28
posted on
05/27/2005 12:55:44 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
To: blam
Carthegenians hired mercenaries to fight their wars and never gave Hannibal they support he needed. Result was they fell and were estinguished after the third punic war. Rome rid herself of her biggest rival in the Mediterranean. Rome later fell (centuries later) after turning socialist (nobody worked), debasing their currency and having others (non-Romans) protect the boundaries of the empire.
To: Graymatter
Greeks and Romans and just about every other ancient race also practiced infanticideThe exception was the Jews. Just about every ancient writer who mentions the Jews comments on their bizarre habit of raising all their children.
30
posted on
05/27/2005 1:01:27 PM PDT
by
Restorer
To: Restorer
Just about every ancient writer who mentions the Jews comments on their bizarre habit of raising all their children.But remember, all religions are the same.
31
posted on
05/27/2005 1:02:40 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
To: blam
32
posted on
05/27/2005 1:02:51 PM PDT
by
Calusa
(Izzy lied 17 died.)
To: thoughtomator
33
posted on
05/27/2005 1:03:29 PM PDT
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: hubbubhubbub
Rome later fell (centuries later) after turning socialist (nobody worked), debasing their currency and having others (non-Romans) protect the boundaries of the empire.The part about socialism is funny!
Socialism, if it means anything at all, is a belief in human equality. That's one delusion Rome was never prey to.
Rome fell for a host of reasons, with the big one being that her own citizens no longer believed in the worth of their own society and weren't willing to fight and die for it. Which is essentially the same reason the USSR collapsed, and why Europe is headed that direction.
Offhand, I think they were right. Their society wasn't worth fighting and dying for.
34
posted on
05/27/2005 1:05:23 PM PDT
by
Restorer
To: Restorer
Edward Gibbon thought Christianity was a major cause of the fall of the Roman Empire.
To: Strategerist
I am aware of that. But I think he's wrong. The conversion to Christianity probably gave the Western Empire another century of life. And it formed the core principle of the Eastern Empire, which hung on for another millenium.
36
posted on
05/27/2005 1:08:07 PM PDT
by
Restorer
To: blam
the Romans, who leveled the city and, according to legend, plowed salt into farmland to make it barren. Probably just legend. Salt was too expensive to be used in such quantities.
37
posted on
05/27/2005 1:09:12 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made. " -Bismarck)
To: Restorer; wideawake
"Semitic" refers to the twelve tribes of Shem. The Arabs were not among that number. The other group were the tribes of Cham (if I have that name correct). I never claimed that the Arabs weren't related to the Hebrews. The Semites and Hamites are two related groups, in the same sense that the different branches of the Indo-European family are related, but still form separate branches.
38
posted on
05/27/2005 1:09:14 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: Strategerist
Edward Gibbon thought Christianity was a major cause of the fall of the Roman Empire. Yes...through the unintended consequence of leaching all the ethical people from public service...Gibbon was not particularly kind to Christianity, was he?
39
posted on
05/27/2005 1:09:39 PM PDT
by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
To: blam
He wasn't called "Hannibal the Cannibal" for nothing.
40
posted on
05/27/2005 1:11:38 PM PDT
by
Alouette
(The only thing learned from history is that nobody ever learns from history.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson