Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carthage Tries To Live Down Image As Site Of Infanticide
Post-Gazette/Wall Street Journal ^ | 5-26-2004 | Andrew Higgins

Posted on 05/27/2005 12:20:44 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Oberon
Gibbon was not particularly kind to Christianity, was he?

Considering when it was written I'm a bit surprised he didn't catch more heat than he did for that.

41 posted on 05/27/2005 1:11:52 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham
In Rome's eye a nation so evil that it could burn babies was an abomination that HAD to be destroyed. A people who would do that are so beyond any pale of acceptable human behavior that no peace with them is possible.

The Romans didn't go after Carthage out of some desire to make the world a better place. It was a power struggle for domination of the Meditteranean world.

42 posted on 05/27/2005 1:11:58 PM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made. " -Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Arabs are Hamitic, not Semitic.

Their language is Semitic, but Arabs are anti-Semitic.

43 posted on 05/27/2005 1:13:48 PM PDT by Alouette (The only thing learned from history is that nobody ever learns from history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

Yes! (LOL. What the fear of God makes some folks do!)


44 posted on 05/27/2005 1:13:58 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: inquest
"Semitic" refers to the twelve tribes of Shem.

"Semitic" refers to Shem, one of the sons of Noah. The others were Ham and Japhet.

There were twelve tribes of Israel, based on the twelve sons of Jacob.

You really need to bone up on your Bible studies.

45 posted on 05/27/2005 1:17:47 PM PDT by Alouette (The only thing learned from history is that nobody ever learns from history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: inquest
"Semitic" refers to the twelve tribes of Shem

No, it refers to the descendants of Shem. The genealogy of direct descent goes: Shem, Arphaxad, Salah, Peleg, Eber, Reu, Serug, Nahor, Terah, Abraham.

Abraham the Semite had two sons - Ishmael and Isaac.

The modern-day Arabs are descendants of Abraham through Ishmael and are therefore Semites like their forefather Abraham.

Perhaps you are confused with the twelve tribes of Israel, the sons of Jacob.

Shem had only 9 sons.

The other group were the tribes of Cham (if I have that name correct).

The Hamites and the sons of Japheth were the other two branches of Noah's descendants.

The Canaanites whom the Israelites displaced were Hamites as were the Cushites, ancestors of the Ethiopians.

46 posted on 05/27/2005 1:18:43 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Modernman

It was a power struggle with an edge of total war that Carthage never understood.

Total war requires hate propaganda.


47 posted on 05/27/2005 1:18:49 PM PDT by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: inquest

The Arabs reckon themselves as Semitic based on their descent through Abraham, who was certainly Semitic. Hagar was Egyptian, and therefore possibly Hamitic, although I don't know for sure.


48 posted on 05/27/2005 1:19:47 PM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham
In Rome's eye a nation so evil that it could burn babies was an abomination that HAD to be destroyed.

Was that the justification given for leveling Carthage by any of the major speakers who advocated it? That explanation seems spurious for two reasons: One, Rome's overweening concern for the welfare of Carthage's children didn't seem to give them any inhibitions about killing every last one of them. And Two, Rome itself wasn't exactly what you'd call a humanitarian paradise.

Carthaginian elites did not understand that Rome utterly hated them and would only be satisfied with their destruction.

I can't say for sure what the "elites" thought, but I think Carthage was pretty well aware that Rome had it in for them. Once they had been defeated after the 2nd Punic War, they were very careful to avoid doing anything that would upset Rome. It only seemed to make Rome even more fanatical in its demands of them. Of course, that's what appeasement will do for you.

49 posted on 05/27/2005 1:19:58 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham
It was a power struggle with an edge of total war that Carthage never understood.

I like the scene in Gadiator where they're re-playing the battle of Carthage in the Coliseum. From the point of view of the romans in the 2nd Century AD, the Punic wars would have been ancient history. Kind of like us watching a movie about the Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire.

50 posted on 05/27/2005 1:22:25 PM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made. " -Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Socialism, if it means anything at all, is a belief in human equality.

Nah. That may be socialist propaganda, but it isn't socialist belief. True socialism is the pooling of resources for the common good, and to make it easier for the elites to skim off the top.

51 posted on 05/27/2005 1:22:41 PM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
It was a power struggle for domination of the Meditteranean world.

It wasn't even that. The power struggle was already over, and Carthage had already been reduced to a shadow of its former self. Its destruction was just pure spite on the part of the Romans.

52 posted on 05/27/2005 1:23:18 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
The Arabs reckon themselves as Semitic based on their descent through Abraham, who was certainly Semitic. Hagar was Egyptian, and therefore possibly Hamitic

You're correct.

53 posted on 05/27/2005 1:24:14 PM PDT by Alouette (The only thing learned from history is that nobody ever learns from history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Considering when it was written I'm a bit surprised he didn't catch more heat than he did for that.

He moved in some pretty decadent circles. Also, the number of folks who actually READ his great thumping doorstop of a book was probably pretty small.

54 posted on 05/27/2005 1:24:35 PM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: inquest

There were 12 tribes of Israel. I don't know anywhere the bible talks about tribes of Shem. You are confusing your references.


55 posted on 05/27/2005 1:25:22 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

The "sons of Shem" are listed in Genesis 10:21-31, just FYI.


56 posted on 05/27/2005 1:27:24 PM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

You must differentiate between what an ideology preaches and what it practices. In practice you aren't that far off, although similar claims can arguably be made about every other system of governance or economy ever developed.

But those who genuinely believe in socialism do so out of a desire to force humans to be equal.


57 posted on 05/27/2005 1:29:28 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: blam
"We didn't do it," says the 69-year-old archaeologist, rejecting accusations that the ancient citizens of this North African land sacrificed babies to appease their gods.

Now that he's reached the desired conclusion all he has to do is twist and distort the facts to make it all fit. Kinda like the eco-terrorists and the so-called "global warming" issue.

58 posted on 05/27/2005 1:30:36 PM PDT by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer; Oberon; wideawake; Alouette
OK, I Googled it. I stand corrected. Arabs are Semites.
59 posted on 05/27/2005 1:32:19 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

Kinda got piled on, didn't ya? :)


60 posted on 05/27/2005 1:33:52 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson