Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Law is On the Side of Valerie Plame (Larry Johnson Mr. Expert)
TPM Cafe ^ | oct. 17, 2005 | Larry Johnson

Posted on 10/17/2005 7:25:22 PM PDT by blogblogginaway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: ken in texas
Is Ex-CIA Agent Larry C. Johnson Threatening A Freeper?
21 posted on 10/17/2005 7:42:28 PM PDT by syriacus (Don't look for medical breakthroughs to be accomplished by pro-abort or pro-euthanasia doctors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
This guy has it all wrong. Observe:

(4) The term "covert agent" means-- (A) a present or retired officer or employee of an intelligence agency or a present or retired member of the Armed Forces assigned to duty with an intelligence agency-- (i) whose identity as such an officer, employee, or member is classified information,

Yes, she fullfills (A)(i).

and(ii) who is serving outside the United States or has within the last five years served outside the United States;

She was not serving outside the US, and had not within the last 5 years been serving outside the US. (A)(ii)not fulfilled.

or (B) a United States citizen whose intelligence relationship to the United States is classified information, and-- (i) who resides and acts outside the United States as an agent of, or informant or source of operational assistance to, an intelligence agency,

Nope that's not her. (B) is satisfied but (B)(i) is not.

or (ii) who is at the time of the disclosure acting as an agent of, or informant to, the foreign counterintelligence or foreign counterterrorism components of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

Nope she never worked for the FBI (that we know of)

or (C) an individual, other than a United States citizen, whose past or present intelligence relationship to the United States is classified information and who is a present or former agent of, or a present or former informant or source of operational assistance to, an intelligence agency.

Well she is a US citizen, so that disqualifies her from paragraph (C).

Am I making any mistakes here? Remember the ands and ors are very important.

22 posted on 10/17/2005 7:44:57 PM PDT by Oblongata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

OK, you posted this claptrap, I really want hear your take on it, please respond.


23 posted on 10/17/2005 7:47:42 PM PDT by TheHound (You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; syriacus
Thanks for the confirmation... didn't have enough keyboard time earlier to check more thoroughly.
24 posted on 10/17/2005 7:50:00 PM PDT by ken in texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Yes. The only reason I posted it is because most here know who he is and we could poke a little fun at the loser. Hope he doesn't feel the urge to threaten anyone who is better educated than he in these matters like he did before when he proved beyond any reasonable doubt what a loser in life wannabe he is.


25 posted on 10/17/2005 7:53:12 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Larry Johnson was PART OF THE EX-CIA CONSPIRACY TO DEFEAT BUSH IN 2004! He was one of those running around with conspiracy theories and pimping the Joe Wilson and other related stories...

He's the least objective person on this topic you could possibly find ... except Joe Wilson himself.


26 posted on 10/17/2005 7:53:41 PM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Larry Johnson quote (7/10/2001) -

"I hope for a world where facts, not fiction, determine our policy. While terrorism is not vanquished, in a world where thousands of nuclear warheads are still aimed across the continents, terrorism is not the biggest security challenge confronting the United States, and it should not be portrayed that way."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1447248/posts

And what happened two months later Larry?


27 posted on 10/17/2005 7:54:53 PM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

This is the only time I have seen the panties in a twist liberal democrat crud worried about national security. When Bugger was stealing documents they had nothing to say. The leftists who are now screaming national security are just hypocrites who have opposed the CIA/ NSA / DIA etc. 100% of the time.


28 posted on 10/17/2005 7:55:56 PM PDT by putupjob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
The Declining Terrorist Threat, by Larry Johnson (July 10, 2001)
29 posted on 10/17/2005 7:56:31 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Delay for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheHound
He's wrong. His hatred for this current administration clouds his judgment.
30 posted on 10/17/2005 7:56:41 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

Bwhahaha!!! Didn't he have a relative who helped design The Titanic?


31 posted on 10/17/2005 7:57:57 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness (Behold the Riderless Pony. Bringing doom and destruction on a smaller scale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Ummm... "Mr. Expert"? REALLY? Impressive.


32 posted on 10/17/2005 7:59:13 PM PDT by Texas WOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Larry Johnson, liar, traitor, incompetent, paranoid, fool.


33 posted on 10/17/2005 8:01:19 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
He is bad-mouthing Victoria Toensing's take on this...but from what I understand, Toesning helped WRITE the law, so she should know what it is...

The divergence is on the facts. He provides a different set of facts, reaches the opposite conclusion.

Toensings point of view was expressed in the amicus brief filed on behalf of 39 media outlets - that brief argued "no crime"

IIRC, John Dean (?) some weasel anyway, had a theory that a different statue could be violated to get an underlying cause of action.

I don't even bother following this because I think it's pure media fudge.

34 posted on 10/17/2005 8:01:19 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Ummmm...didn't Ms. Toensing CO-AUTHOR this law? How can Mr. Expert say she is wrong?

What a moron.


35 posted on 10/17/2005 8:04:08 PM PDT by Purrcival (Hang tough, FReepers! Everything will work out just fine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

What a big fat loser.


36 posted on 10/17/2005 8:06:46 PM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
LOL, he is one of Chrissy's girly men.

During the Afghanistan war, he was on TV shouting quagmire every 2 days!
37 posted on 10/17/2005 8:09:40 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9
I hear that over and over again except from the MSM. I wonder why?

Yes, just how does EVERYONE on the MSM side have "knowledge" of Plames covertness? As far as I can tell we really don't know with any certainty whether she was or was not covert. All we really know is that it doesn't appear that she was.

38 posted on 10/17/2005 8:11:12 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
What is the focus of this grand jury?

Looking for ham sandwich?

39 posted on 10/17/2005 8:11:53 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Thanks.


40 posted on 10/17/2005 8:12:18 PM PDT by TheHound (You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson