Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Show We've Been Losing Face For 10,000 Years
The Times (UK) ^ | 11-20-2005 | Jonathan Leake

Posted on 11/20/2005 1:21:49 PM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 421-436 next last
To: Mamzelle
What does GGG stand for?...

Greta Garbo's gone.

181 posted on 11/20/2005 4:27:36 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: narby
A problem with evolution--there's an argument about what evolution means.

My own definition, which has provoked a fit of red fonting, is that evolution (to most people) means that natural selection is the impetus that makes one species emerge from another, though conditions of geo isolation and lots and lots of geological time. This has proven too primitive a definition for some evos here, can you handle it?

182 posted on 11/20/2005 4:27:48 PM PST by Mamzelle (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

I don't even know if this is 'genetic' as much as it is the change in diet and lifestyle changing the way our bones and teeth develop.

For instance, if at birth we dropped an infant in a culture that rarely cooked and didn't eat farmed food, maybe the jaws and teeth would develop to match the 'old' human structure.


183 posted on 11/20/2005 4:29:06 PM PST by Skywalk (Transdimensional Jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

"speach"? :-)


184 posted on 11/20/2005 4:29:55 PM PST by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Done.


185 posted on 11/20/2005 4:29:58 PM PST by Junior (From now on, I'll stick to science, and leave the hunting alien mutants to the experts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
This has proven too primitive a definition for some evos here, can you handle it?

Getting into definition parsing games has about the appeal to me as parsing Bill Clinton quotes.

The whole effort seems... so.... Trollish to me.

186 posted on 11/20/2005 4:31:14 PM PST by narby (Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: narby; Mamzelle; editor-surveyor

Namecalling, five yard penalty.


187 posted on 11/20/2005 4:32:52 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: zeeba neighba

But the same argument would hold for my family as well...altho I had wisdom teeth, neither my brother or parents did....and my great grandparents had 12 children that lived to adult hood, and their children had many children, and in my parents generation and in my generation we have had less children...I did not say that people with wisdom teeth had less children...

But it does make sense, that those people who did have wisdom teeth, ,before the advent of modern dentistry, and had those wisdom teeth become impacted and infected, would die earlier, and perhaps die before they had a chance to reproduce...I do know, ,that my wisdom teeth were impacted and were infected, and if a dentist had not removed them, I would have been very ill, due to that infection, and possibly could have died...

So, as was previously pointed out by another poster, this may have had some effect, tho a small one, as to how many with wisdom teeth, or without wisdom teeth went on to reproduce...

I dont believe that anectodal stories about your family or my family matter much in the scheme of things...


188 posted on 11/20/2005 4:33:19 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

Probably the reasons are purely cultural. Africans and Arabs and polygamous Mormons, some with no teeth, have us all beat.


189 posted on 11/20/2005 4:35:22 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk

Well, probably not, at least not for many generations. It's like the farmer who selects sheep for twinning (an uncommon thing in nature, but very common now in sheep)--eventually, if sheep are left alone in the wild, twinning will almost disappear. However, we've also bred most sheep not to be able to shed their fleece, so those sheep in the wild would smother before they could stop twinning.


190 posted on 11/20/2005 4:36:13 PM PST by Mamzelle (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
"speach"

Fat fingers and closed eyes :o)

191 posted on 11/20/2005 4:37:32 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA

Evolution is really just about change.
susie


192 posted on 11/20/2005 4:37:48 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracty theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

That's quite a yarn.


193 posted on 11/20/2005 4:37:55 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
We know that cars run (in spite of the fact that gasoline is insufficient by itself,) and that evolution works (in spite of the fact that natural selection is insufficient by itself.)

Gasoline exists because it is refined from oil to power cars.
Oil existed long before cars did, and is not dependent upon cars for its existance.
Natural selection exists in and of itself, it is sufficient and does not need "evolution" to support it. Evolution needs natural selection and hundreds of other factors for its support.

We know that cars run, we do not know that evolution is valid. Your analogy is deeply flawed.

194 posted on 11/20/2005 4:38:45 PM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

Yes, I understand.
susie


195 posted on 11/20/2005 4:39:59 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracty theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
Choosing a mate because she has a pretty face is natural SELECTION, NOT "evolution".

...and the difference would be...?

Back to biology class with you.

Uh, right. Back to biology (and theology) class for YOU my FRiend. "Selection" dictates everything from good looking and intelligent kids coming from good looking and intelligent parents to cat breeding. "Evolution" dictates a "new and improved" SPECIES from a random mutation that is NOT ONLY beneficial to the new species but self-replicating to future generations. The difference between natural or artificial "selection" and "evolution" is enormous.

196 posted on 11/20/2005 4:40:26 PM PST by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: zeeba neighba

I am often in awe of my great-grandmother..as I stated, she raised 12 children into adulthood, most of them not dying until they were well into their 90s and a few well over the age of 100...great-grammie herself lived to be well into her 90s...

But what astounds me, is that she also buried 5 other children before they ever reached the age of 6...and had several miscarriages, or babies born dead...the relatives figure that great grammie probably was pregnant about 24 times, during her lifetime...

Even more astounding, is that she made time for all her children, her grandchildren, her great grandchildren, and her great great grandchildren...she loved us all...when she died, the funeral home could not accomodate all those present, in just one viewing room...they had to open up all the other viewing rooms, and pipe in the service via an intercom set up...she was a beloved woman who produced a literal army of descendants...


197 posted on 11/20/2005 4:42:21 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: zeeba neighba
Gee, for some reason we can't agree on a plain defintion of evolution..?

Huh. Now that surprises me...a little.

Selection for type+geo isolation+beeellions and beeellions of years=emergence of independent species...this was what I was taught. What's wrong with it?

198 posted on 11/20/2005 4:42:27 PM PST by Mamzelle (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

I had wisdom teeth, but they did not become a problem and need removal until after I had had children. They are not a health risk before adolescence.


199 posted on 11/20/2005 4:43:29 PM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

She sounds wonderful. Today, because most women don't want to be pregnant for half their lives, and marry older, and have the pill, is the reason for less children. That and abortion on demand. Wisdom teeth got nothing to do with it.


200 posted on 11/20/2005 4:48:22 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 421-436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson