Posted on 12/01/2005 11:01:48 AM PST by Tzimisce
>>"You're really only left with two possibilities," Renne said. "One is that they are really old hominids - shockingly old - or they're not footprints."<<
This guy isn't much of a critical thinker. There is a third possibility: their dating paradigm/method is flawed and the footprints are not that old.
>>Okay. All who believe humans or any other creature walked on lava that was soft enough for footprints to be formed, let's see a show of posters!<<
Lava?! I thought they said silly-putty!
Never mind...
Old topic, from the FRchives. Adding to the list, not pinging.
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.