Skip to comments.
Giant Crater Found [in Antarctica]: Tied to Worst Mass Extinction Ever [Permo-Triassic]
SPACE.com ^
| June 2, 2006
| Robert Roy Britt
Posted on 06/02/2006 11:44:43 AM PDT by cogitator
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-130 last
To: Red Badger
Think about the great lake-front property around this crater after Global Warming makes Antarctica a must see tourist destination! (sarcasm)
121
posted on
06/04/2006 11:02:16 AM PDT
by
VRWCtaz
(Conservatism is about promoting opportunity and Liberalism is about controlling outcome.)
To: Agamemnon; editor-surveyor; PatrickHenry; Virginia-American
[Ichneumon to Agamemnon:] Speaking of "stupid explantions [sic]", I'll send you $1000 if you can explain why exactly you think the Big Bang is somehow incompatible with retrograde rotation of planets without making a complete fool of yourself (i.e., saying something really idiotic that demonstrates a gross ignorance of even the most basic high school science). Go for it! Still waiting... Any of the other anti-evolution nuts here are invited to take the same challenge, if you're interested in making complet fools of yourselves and demonstrating that you don't understand elementary physics.
122
posted on
06/04/2006 1:12:07 PM PDT
by
Ichneumon
(Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
To: Ichneumon; Agamemnon
The 'Big Bang' has been re-definined in so many ways, so many times that I fail to see how it can be called upon to give a definitive requirement for direction of rotation of the planets. This does not mean that I take issue with Agamemnon's assertion; merely that I don't see the same conflict. It's likely that he has a better grasp than either of us though.
123
posted on
06/04/2006 1:44:30 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: DaveLoneRanger
Why, do you think it was more recent, or...?No, but there wasn't any information about why they thought it had happened in the correct time-frame. Something I read today indicated that the geology of the area would put the impact "around" 250 million years old, but that allows them a pretty big window-of-opportunity.
My ping list is "Geology Picture of the Week". I occasionally alert them to other geological items of interest.
125
posted on
09/20/2006 10:56:22 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 16, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
126
posted on
09/20/2006 11:04:36 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 16, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
127
posted on
07/29/2009 2:48:17 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
128
posted on
07/29/2009 2:48:52 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
129
posted on
03/19/2016 12:22:42 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
130
posted on
03/19/2016 12:23:40 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-130 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
