Skip to comments.
How the Feminists’ “War against Boys” Paved the Way for Islam (GREAT READ)
The Brussels Journal ^
| September 5th, 2006
| n Aasted Hals
Posted on 09/05/2006 12:42:39 PM PDT by 2banana
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: 2banana
Excellent article!
"We were horrible. Why didn't you stop us?"
Unfortunately, the law got there first. For example, no-fault divorce, signed into law in 1966 by California Gov. Ronald Reagan (which he later regretted, but the effects could not be undone)...
And, it's awfully hard to stop an unelected, unaccountable moonbat in a black robe who creatively twists the law and the Constitution to remake society according to a left-wing agenda....
To: 2banana
This reminds me of a Scandanavian woman a few years ago that had her boyfriend so trained that she forbade him to go to the bathroom with the seat up. Guess she must have checked somehow. He must have considered the benefit worth the humiliating loss of his manhood.
To: 2banana
that we should have quotas for Muslim immigrants, too.I quite agree. Of course, we might disagree on what that quota should be ....
23
posted on
09/05/2006 1:40:23 PM PDT
by
RonF
To: BenLurkin
The Swedish women need to start packing pistols and plugging the perverts -- not asking that more of them be allowed into the country. That's the obvious solution!
24
posted on
09/05/2006 1:44:52 PM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: 2banana
Perhaps the reason Scandanavian women aren't outraged by their abuse by the muslim horde is that deep down they like it. Better a swarthy dominating beast than a pale quiche eating wimp.
25
posted on
09/05/2006 1:53:30 PM PDT
by
BadAndy
("Loud mouth internet Rambo")
To: 2banana
"What this world needs is a few more rednecks!"
26
posted on
09/05/2006 1:53:40 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Yep.)
To: BenLurkin
Also bring back the Swedish Bikini Team!
27
posted on
09/05/2006 1:56:12 PM PDT
by
Ukiapah Heep
(Shoes for Industry!)
To: 2banana
Feminism: Radical Islam rode the wave.
28
posted on
09/05/2006 2:02:13 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: The_Media_never_lie
One wonders why the poor guy stayed. The broad couldn't have been that good looking.
29
posted on
09/05/2006 3:11:48 PM PDT
by
RepoGirl
("Tom, I'm getting dead from you, but I'm not getting Un-dead..." -- Frasier Crane)
To: RepoGirl
It doesn't seem possible that she was that extremely good looking that he would consent to lose his manliness. Unless, it is a character issue, maybe a Scandanavian thing?
To: wagglebee
Don't have time to read this at the moment, if it reveals feminism for the evil that it is, maybe list?
To: 2banana
According to strict, atheist Darwinism, the purpose of life is to reproduce.To reproduce, but not to be married. If a man's purpose is only to reproduce he could have more children by abandoning monogamy.
Actually atheists are much like the feminists. They say sure, the Islamists are theocratic patriarchal pigs, but no more so than George W. and the Christian Right Taliban.
To: little jeremiah
As usual-- this is "all part of the big plan" Actually, it is the EPITOME of the BIG PLAN!!
Such hatred of men, moral values, family, and God are why many of us, "taliban, rapist", evil white men", are just saying "no thanks" to the whole da%n mess anymore, finding other things to occupy our time, and allowing the femilezi crowd to fend for themselves, with their metrosexual, Emasculated men.
In the end--they WILL get what they deserve, as some here say.
Of course, THEN.......when the imans and the emans and the taliban are at the door, DEMANDING they SUBMIT OR DIE, they will cry for a real man to save them.
But it will be too late for them then.....
33
posted on
09/05/2006 10:23:52 PM PDT
by
Rca2000
(I may be a prude, but at least I am CONSISTENT about my beliefs!!)
To: Rca2000
....Or as usual, the Europeans will end up calling on the Americans again to bail them out.
34
posted on
09/06/2006 9:28:52 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
(A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation.)
To: 2banana; xsmommy
Interesting, and informative.
But, the writer does ignore the "search for support" (or craving for security!!) that IS the reason most women vote for the democrat's socialism.
They see the Federal government (which they control through their press and their universities) as THE ONLY source now of security. Of money. Of retirement.
It was Rush (I believe) who quoted a report saying some 75% of women actively FEAR the possibility of becoming "homeless" and "living on the street." Even those making over 100,000.00 a year share that fear. So, since the feminists have castrated males, have destroyed the social barriers that tended to protect women and protect the family against blowing up for minor problems, they MUST invent a new male (the government) which will protect them.
But, in doing that, they have also invited the Muslim culture to attack us. After, the ENEMY is the white, male, capitalistic, Christian, European male.
35
posted on
09/06/2006 9:45:26 AM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
i GUESS that is what those women think, but honestly, i don't know a single one that fears homelessness.
36
posted on
09/06/2006 9:47:20 AM PDT
by
xsmommy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson